Skip to main content

Trance, techno, hard house, hard dance and rave

All very different, but amazing to listen to.

Techno is more rapid and fast, but uses electronics well. laughed at for the 90s hysteria of crap pop music.
DO NOT GET IT MIXED UP WITH POP.

Trance is more musical and slower, which makes it very classical.

hard house is probably the greatest of them all, with fast tempo, great sounds and amazing climaxes.

Hard Dance is so much faster than all of the above, making it harder for beginners to the genre.

Rave, the dying genre, can range from slow, relaxing music to fast bumping sounds. some would say it relies too much on repitition.

Its best to start from this order to really enjoy the music, otherwise youll think youve wasted a good 15 quid on a CD, while hardcore fans will relish such a CD.

You dont have to take drugs, you dont have to be a hard-nut, you dont have to go about wearing massive trousers, you just want to listen to the music, and have a good time.
Its music, thats all. And why do people slag fans of these genres for listening to it? Are they really that shallow?

Enjoy. All people welcome.

hard as a rock

To get errected to the point it is compared to a rock
"Your Di*k Is hard as a rock

chillin hard on the reg 

v. the act of being hella chill, or straight chillin out, on a regular day to day basis

n. a lifestyle that involves being chill as a cucumber 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year*

*366 days a year on leap year
ChillBro1: What are you up to brah?
ChillBro2: Nothin broski... chillin hard on the reg.
chillin hard on the reg by ihop462 October 21, 2010

Hard Problem of Relativity

The ontological status of spacetime. Relativity brilliantly describes gravity as the curvature of a 4D spacetime continuum. The hard problem: Is this mathematical model—a static, geometric "block universe" where past, present, and future equally exist—a true picture of reality? If so, it obliterates free will and the passage of time as illusions. Or is it just a fantastically useful computational tool for predicting how things move and age relative to each other? We're forced to choose: either accept a frozen, deterministic cosmos that feels nothing like our lived experience, or admit our best theory of gravity describes relationships, not fundamental reality.
Example: According to relativity, from a god's-eye view, your birth, you reading this, and your death are all just fixed points in the spacetime block, like cities on a map. The hard problem: Your undeniable, visceral experience is of a flowing "now." Is that feeling a complete fiction generated by your brain? If spacetime is real, then the future is already "out there," waiting. This makes physics philosophically intolerable for most people, suggesting the theory may be a powerful instrumental description, not a literal metaphysical truth. But what, then, is gravity actually doing? Hard Problem of Relativity.

Hard Problem of Religion

The inevitable corruption of transcendent experience by institutional power. Religion often begins with a profound, transformative mystical insight or revelation (e.g., the Buddha's enlightenment, Moses at the burning bush). The hard problem is that to preserve and spread this insight, it must be codified into dogma, ritual, and hierarchy—an institution. The institution then inevitably becomes invested in its own survival, power, and social control, often betraying the very transformative, anti-establishment spirit that founded it. The container ends up worshipped instead of the contents.
Example: Jesus overturns the money-changers' tables in the temple, criticizing rigid legalism. Centuries later, the selling of papal indulgences (paying for forgiveness) becomes standard practice in the institution bearing his name. The hard problem: The spiritual "virus" needs a social "host" to spread, but the host's immune system (bureaucracy, dogma, politics) eventually attacks the virus. You can't have organized religion without organization, but organization seems to kill the religious spark. The result is often empty ritual, inquisitions, and wealth accumulation—the exact opposites of the founder's stated goals. Hard Problem of Religion.

Hard Problem of Reality

The terrifying gap between the world as it appears to our senses/consciousness and the world as it might be "in itself." Our entire reality is a user-interface generated by our brains—a simplified, species-specific model optimized for survival, not truth. The hard problem is that we are forever locked inside this simulation, with no way to peek at the source code. Even our most objective instruments (telescopes, particle colliders) just feed data back into our perceptual and cognitive interface. We can never know if we're describing the "real" reality or just the next layer of a nested simulation. The map is all we have; the territory is permanently off-limits.
*Example: You see a "solid" wooden table. Physics tells you it's 99.9999999% empty space, a quantum cloud of vibrating fields. Which is the real table? The useful, evolved illusion of solidity, or the counter-intuitive mathematical description? Both are models in your mind. The hard problem: We can swap out one model for a better one (Newtonian for Quantum), but we can never discard modeling altogether to see the "thing itself." Reality is the one guest at the party who can never be directly perceived, only inferred from the reactions of others.* Hard Problem of Reality.
Hard Problem of Reality by Enkigal January 24, 2026