Evolution is the hypothetical theory or joke that everything came into existence (the earth, 4.5 billion years ago) through natural processes over an elongated duration without any logical evidence. Likewise, according to the secular view, evolution is presumed “science” in education, but is nothing more than another heretical religion demoting the Evangelical truth of God’s creation with diluvial scripture aligning physical evidence to the Biblical creation.
1. True Evolution is merely a theory derived by sinful human error.
2. Evolution is scientific heresy, teaching fictional stories on the account of human error.
3. Evolution demotes the Evangelical truth as it is full of error.
4. Evolution is illogical and “secular scientists” are biased in their own beliefs, ignoring living mammoth tissue and dinosaur blood.
5. Evolution is not a science, but the science of heresy.
6. Evolution is humanity’s greatest joke.
2. Evolution is scientific heresy, teaching fictional stories on the account of human error.
3. Evolution demotes the Evangelical truth as it is full of error.
4. Evolution is illogical and “secular scientists” are biased in their own beliefs, ignoring living mammoth tissue and dinosaur blood.
5. Evolution is not a science, but the science of heresy.
6. Evolution is humanity’s greatest joke.
by Evidential TruthSeeker November 13, 2023
Get the True Evolutionmug. An Australian term. Meaning pretty bright blue eyes as the True blue convicts in the early days were genuinely considered to have alot of go in them.They were honest,tough and extremely hardworkers
by TAV-OH June 25, 2024
Get the True bluemug. The ratio of upvotes awarded to a commenter compared to upvotes awarded to an original poster (OP) weighted for each user's follower count. TAR adjusts for engagement for both parties. True Adjusted Ratio is calculated as follows:
TAR = (Folₒₚ)/(Fol꜀) x (UV꜀)/(UVₒₚ), where a value >1 is considered a "W"
Strengths:
- TAR reflects the true impact of a comment in unbalanced interactions. Comments with fewer followers are augmented, further amplifying OP's humiliation.
- It is possible for a commenter with fewer followers than OP to have fewer upvotes than OP and still obtain a "W".
Limitations:
- True Adjusted Ratio assumes followers of each account are supportive. It does not take into account "hate-followers".
- TAR fails to take virality into account. A comment is more likely to receive engagement during the time when a post is most viral, after which engagement in both original post and comment deteriorate at different geometric rates.
- TAR calculation does not account for downvotes or tertiary responses. While TAR is a more accurate measure in social media spaces with upvote-only rating systems (e.g. Twitter), ratio calculations may be redundant in spaces which use an upvote/downvote system (e.g. Reddit). Tertiary reactions that are ambiguous (e.g. Facebook) are not factored into this calculation.
- "Premium account" algorithms (such as Elon Musk's blue-check model on Twitter) artificially alter views, skewing engagement in favor of paid subscribers.
TAR = (Folₒₚ)/(Fol꜀) x (UV꜀)/(UVₒₚ), where a value >1 is considered a "W"
Strengths:
- TAR reflects the true impact of a comment in unbalanced interactions. Comments with fewer followers are augmented, further amplifying OP's humiliation.
- It is possible for a commenter with fewer followers than OP to have fewer upvotes than OP and still obtain a "W".
Limitations:
- True Adjusted Ratio assumes followers of each account are supportive. It does not take into account "hate-followers".
- TAR fails to take virality into account. A comment is more likely to receive engagement during the time when a post is most viral, after which engagement in both original post and comment deteriorate at different geometric rates.
- TAR calculation does not account for downvotes or tertiary responses. While TAR is a more accurate measure in social media spaces with upvote-only rating systems (e.g. Twitter), ratio calculations may be redundant in spaces which use an upvote/downvote system (e.g. Reddit). Tertiary reactions that are ambiguous (e.g. Facebook) are not factored into this calculation.
- "Premium account" algorithms (such as Elon Musk's blue-check model on Twitter) artificially alter views, skewing engagement in favor of paid subscribers.
True Adjusted Ratio: TAR
OP: Original Post
Folₒₚ: Followers of OP
UVₒₚ: Upvotes for OP
Fol꜀: Followers of commenter
UV꜀: Upvotes for commenter
If a user with 100 followers (Folₒₚ = 100) receives 40 upvotes (UVₒₚ = 40) and a comment from a user with 1000 followers (Fol꜀ = 1000) receives 50 upvotes (UV꜀ = 50), traditional calculation would consider OP "ratioed" using traditional calculation:
R = UV꜀/UVₒₚ = 50/40 = 1.25
R > 1, thus OP would be ratioed
However, since OP's follower count is 1/10th that of the commenter's, the True Adjusted Ratio (TAR) is calculated as follows:
TAR = (Folₒₚ)/(Fol꜀) x (UV꜀)/(UVₒₚ) = 100 / 1000 x 50 / 40 = 0.1 x 1.25 = 0.125,
TAR < 1, thus OP would not be ratioed.
OP: Original Post
Folₒₚ: Followers of OP
UVₒₚ: Upvotes for OP
Fol꜀: Followers of commenter
UV꜀: Upvotes for commenter
If a user with 100 followers (Folₒₚ = 100) receives 40 upvotes (UVₒₚ = 40) and a comment from a user with 1000 followers (Fol꜀ = 1000) receives 50 upvotes (UV꜀ = 50), traditional calculation would consider OP "ratioed" using traditional calculation:
R = UV꜀/UVₒₚ = 50/40 = 1.25
R > 1, thus OP would be ratioed
However, since OP's follower count is 1/10th that of the commenter's, the True Adjusted Ratio (TAR) is calculated as follows:
TAR = (Folₒₚ)/(Fol꜀) x (UV꜀)/(UVₒₚ) = 100 / 1000 x 50 / 40 = 0.1 x 1.25 = 0.125,
TAR < 1, thus OP would not be ratioed.
by SlimerAndTheRealGhostbusters June 26, 2023
Get the True Adjusted Ratiomug. Two people who are undoubtedly made for each other and are constantly seen with each other or are even often associated with each other. It is hardly ever seen, but true love does in fact exist, it just depends on your views on it. If you have a negative notion of love, it is likely you won't find it, because you've wired yourself to believe it is not possible, and thus blinding yourself of something that otherwise would happen. If you're positive and are always looking, then you shall find it someday. Even the most "unlovable" and "incorrigible" ones can find love.
There is nothing that can separate them. No matter what hardships come their way, nothing ever taints it. True love is all about fate, or destiny. The future isn't all set in stone, but there are things that are written in the stars that something will happen no matter what and you either have to accept it or destroy the world around you trying to prevent it. Freewill exists to a point, because you're always given the choice to do or to not do something, but fate just means that whatever path you choose, it's merely just stepping stones to the same ending, as opposed to each decision being a road on its own leading to a different outcome.
In other words, some things will happen no matter what you do, and your actions only dictate when it'll happen, not if it will. Those with the capacity to love will find it if they try, and so will you, Reader. Just never stop looking.
There is nothing that can separate them. No matter what hardships come their way, nothing ever taints it. True love is all about fate, or destiny. The future isn't all set in stone, but there are things that are written in the stars that something will happen no matter what and you either have to accept it or destroy the world around you trying to prevent it. Freewill exists to a point, because you're always given the choice to do or to not do something, but fate just means that whatever path you choose, it's merely just stepping stones to the same ending, as opposed to each decision being a road on its own leading to a different outcome.
In other words, some things will happen no matter what you do, and your actions only dictate when it'll happen, not if it will. Those with the capacity to love will find it if they try, and so will you, Reader. Just never stop looking.
True love exists, you just need to look, and not ignore the obvious signs pointing towards it. Don't make the same mistake I did. We ended up getting together and we have our happy ending, but it took so long for us to realize.
by Le-Epic-Troll March 31, 2022
Get the True lovemug. by anonymous December 4, 2021
Get the truemug. Friend: The New BMW uses 15 mpg, has an twin-turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 24-valve inline-6, aluminum block and head, direct fuel injection Engine and goes from 0 - 100 within 4 seconds!
You: So true bestie.
You: So true bestie.
by Gabriellelukatz March 21, 2024
Get the So true bestiemug. I need some WD40 I've got some in the back oh true ways.
I know what the fuck you too sad but true ways hey
I know what the fuck you too sad but true ways hey
by shadybishop July 26, 2019
Get the true waysmug.