by Rozencrantz June 9, 2007
Get the falldown mug.When a person (typically a man) scores with a girl for the first time and then gets hung up over her after getting dumped by that girl. This is normally experienced by guys who kiss or fuck a girl for the first time and become emotionally invested, but end up getting their heart broken when the girl naturally moves on.
Chad: Hey Brad, have you seen Pete around anywhere? Haven't seen him since he got to 2nd base with that thot
Brad: Yeah she dumped his ass and moved on after she had her fun, but Pete's crying because he's hung up over her
Chad: Was she his first ever kiss?
Brad: Yeah man, looks like Pete's experiencing Clingy virgin's fallacy
Brad: Yeah she dumped his ass and moved on after she had her fun, but Pete's crying because he's hung up over her
Chad: Was she his first ever kiss?
Brad: Yeah man, looks like Pete's experiencing Clingy virgin's fallacy
by fagut May 31, 2017
Get the Clingy virgin's fallacy mug.Related Words
fallad
• Falladam
• fallador massacre
• fallacy
• falla
• fallacious
• Fallatio
• falldown
• fallacio
• fallan
The Polarization Fallacy is a logical fallacy used by centrists to claim that both Republicans and Democrats are polarizing the nation. Despite that the fact that the republiturds have moved the the far right while Dems have stayed the same. They usually blame this on the left for refusing to meet right wing extremists half way. When American "centrists" paved the path for right wing extremism in the first place.
What makes them even dumber is that most American "centrists" are actually center to far right compared to the conservative parties of more civilized countries. As the real centrist parties have the word "liberal" in them.
What makes them even dumber is that most American "centrists" are actually center to far right compared to the conservative parties of more civilized countries. As the real centrist parties have the word "liberal" in them.
Examples of the Polarization Fallacy.
Neo-Naz/Trumpanzees/White Christains: WHITE GENOCIDE. WE MUST BRING OTHER RACES TO HEEL BEFORE THEY DO THE SAME DO US. QANON TOLD US SO!
Antifa: Let's not commit genocide. Your violating the bill of rights. So your not only racist that's anti American Fascism.
BLM: Please stop murdering us!
"Centrists": I can't tell these people apart! Democrats need to come back to the middle! The right wouldn't be doing this if the dems weren't such socialists!
Racist: PUT DOWN THE GUN SO I CAN MURDER YOU!
Gun owning non white/ Gun Toting liberal: I have to defend myself, even with lethal force!
"Centrist": Maybe you can let him murder you a little. You don't really need your legs. Stop creating polarization! *gunshots* You didn't have to do that. It only counts as self defense when white men shoot people!
Non white and/or liberal: You're a moron.
Neo-Naz/Trumpanzees/White Christains: WHITE GENOCIDE. WE MUST BRING OTHER RACES TO HEEL BEFORE THEY DO THE SAME DO US. QANON TOLD US SO!
Antifa: Let's not commit genocide. Your violating the bill of rights. So your not only racist that's anti American Fascism.
BLM: Please stop murdering us!
"Centrists": I can't tell these people apart! Democrats need to come back to the middle! The right wouldn't be doing this if the dems weren't such socialists!
Racist: PUT DOWN THE GUN SO I CAN MURDER YOU!
Gun owning non white/ Gun Toting liberal: I have to defend myself, even with lethal force!
"Centrist": Maybe you can let him murder you a little. You don't really need your legs. Stop creating polarization! *gunshots* You didn't have to do that. It only counts as self defense when white men shoot people!
Non white and/or liberal: You're a moron.
by Burn Mar-a-Lago July 21, 2019
Get the Polarization Fallacy mug.The "Git Gud" Fallacy is when a clearly unfair scenario is written off as nothing more than a skill-gap. The fallacy takes place in cases where an individual is naturally better off (meaning they didn't work to be better off with skill or effort) than the person they're facing up against.
For example:
Individuals (A) and (B) aren't capable of having an income and have $0.00 to their name. Somehow, they become contenders in a yacht-buying contest:
Individual (A) receives no money to buy yachts, but the individual (B) receives 1-billion dollars - no strings attached - to spend on the contest...
Who will have to exert more effort to win: Person (A) with no money, or person (B) with 1-billion dollars?
If you think this sounds unfair, then that's the point.
Now, if someone were to say something like, "Well, person (A) should have made better financial decisions so they could beat person (B)," or "Person (A) should've done this, that, or the other thing," that someone would not only be victim blaming, but they would be ignoring the clearly unfair situation and essentially telling the unfortunate person to "GiT GuD," rather than acknowledging that the match-up was never fair in the first place.
For example:
Individuals (A) and (B) aren't capable of having an income and have $0.00 to their name. Somehow, they become contenders in a yacht-buying contest:
Individual (A) receives no money to buy yachts, but the individual (B) receives 1-billion dollars - no strings attached - to spend on the contest...
Who will have to exert more effort to win: Person (A) with no money, or person (B) with 1-billion dollars?
If you think this sounds unfair, then that's the point.
Now, if someone were to say something like, "Well, person (A) should have made better financial decisions so they could beat person (B)," or "Person (A) should've done this, that, or the other thing," that someone would not only be victim blaming, but they would be ignoring the clearly unfair situation and essentially telling the unfortunate person to "GiT GuD," rather than acknowledging that the match-up was never fair in the first place.
"That character is so OP."
"Nah, you just have to learn to fight against them. They're a noob-destroyer."
"If it takes THAT much more effort and skill to learn to fight against THEM SPECIFICALLY, and no other character takes that much concentration to counter, then don't you think they're just OP?
"Bruhhh, lol... just git gud."
"Don't fall for the Git Gud Fallacy..."
(Oh, and not to get too philosophical, but that gif below is a good example of this fallacy because Spongebob is ironically flexing "git gud" into the muscles he didn't work for.)
"Nah, you just have to learn to fight against them. They're a noob-destroyer."
"If it takes THAT much more effort and skill to learn to fight against THEM SPECIFICALLY, and no other character takes that much concentration to counter, then don't you think they're just OP?
"Bruhhh, lol... just git gud."
"Don't fall for the Git Gud Fallacy..."
(Oh, and not to get too philosophical, but that gif below is a good example of this fallacy because Spongebob is ironically flexing "git gud" into the muscles he didn't work for.)
by RandomPhail January 12, 2019
Get the Git Gud Fallacy mug.by uttam maharjan December 31, 2010
Get the fallaciloquence mug.A glitch that took place on 6-6-06 in the popular online role playing game "RUNESCAPE" by Jagex LTD. What happened was that a man found a glitch in one of the new player owned houses that allowed you to attack players OUTSIDE of the wilderness, he went through the runescape town of Fallador killing tons of innocent players. The glitch was caused because the construction skill was new, there for loaded with bugs.
Normally players can't attack other players unless they are in the wilderness or a minigame of some sort.
Normally players can't attack other players unless they are in the wilderness or a minigame of some sort.
Player1: D00d! I just lost My Party hat in the falldor massacure!
Player2: It's spelled fallador massacre and one more thing... HAHAHAHA
Player2: It's spelled fallador massacre and one more thing... HAHAHAHA
by XXX Jeremy XXX December 1, 2006
Get the fallador massacre mug.When you dismiss or delegitimize a point, comment or argument by proclaiming it "Not an argument" and ignore what's being addressed. This is standard tactics by ideologues in comment sections, twitter and facebook. Famously used by internet nutter Stefan Molyneux ad nauseam.
Actual Molyneux Fallacy committed on 15 July 2017 on Twitter:
Stefan Molyneux: "Boycott Reebok!"
Laci Green: "You sound like an SJW"
Stefan Molyneux: "Not an argument"
Stefan Molyneux: "Boycott Reebok!"
Laci Green: "You sound like an SJW"
Stefan Molyneux: "Not an argument"
by thelordoflard July 18, 2017
Get the Molyneux Fallacy mug.