Superpluralism is the intimation that human will is the subset of universal pragmatism; not pragmatism.
This indicates that universal pragmatism and intuition are self and the same.
This indicates that universal pragmatism and intuition are self and the same.
Super-pluralism, mathematically, says that a (countably) infinite lineset (set of lines) cannot be an "over" - set of an uncountable (closed) surface.
by metawave October 15, 2019
Get the Super-pluralism mug.by Ken11 January 23, 2020
Get the Pluralized mug.Related Words
the consolidation and coexistence of liberal, libertarian and anarchist schools of thought in order to limit authority and maximize liberty and equality.
Collectivist and individualist anarchists set up a system under pluraltarianism which combined the two ideologies.
by pluraltarian May 6, 2015
Get the Pluraltarianism mug.by deaddropballs July 1, 2021
Get the pluralsexual mug.pluralone is a lyrical genius
by tess555 March 8, 2022
Get the pluralone mug.A person who identifies themselves with they/them/xey/xem/ etc. pronouns and the like. Often associated with but not limited to people or persons with bright or colorful hair, various piercings, tattoos and possibly shouting about a political or social issue which most likely are misinformed or have little knowledge about.
Also a play on the word "plural" in reference to the words "they" and "them" that are typically plurals. Inspired by the French term "pluralité" from the online Cambridge Dictionary.
Also a play on the word "plural" in reference to the words "they" and "them" that are typically plurals. Inspired by the French term "pluralité" from the online Cambridge Dictionary.
Person 1: "You know that pluralite with the bright color hair we just spoke to? Do you remember what pronouns they used?"
Person 2: "Nah, I already have a hard time speaking pluralese as it is."
Person 2: "Nah, I already have a hard time speaking pluralese as it is."
by Customly May 9, 2024
Get the Pluralite mug.A "We are the world"-Esque delusion that is both undesirable and impossible.
Hym "Pluralism requires the religions to be transformed into something they are not. If the religions are resistant to the change that pluralism requires will inevitably be disempowered. Either by the state or the communication networks. It's at that point you have a hierarchy of religious dogma, backed by the state and communications networks, and it's going to elevate the religions that more closely align with your progressive sensibilities above the religions who do not. What you are suggesting is nothing more than liberals controlling the religions with soft power from the outside in a way that allows them to deny their own culpability. What happens to the Muslim fundamentalists who think gays should be thrown off buildings? What happens to the Christian fundamentalists who object to abortion on religious grounds? They both take a backseat to the other religions that allow your liberal bullshit pluralism to dictate (from the top down) which religions can accrue power. Your pluralism IS the precursor to the hierarchy you condemn. And that was my initial criticism of the Atheist pluralists. 'The religions would be fine if they believed what I believe. I should be the God. As long as the religion is promoting my progressive politics then it's fine.'
Hym "Pluralism requires the religions to be transformed into something they are not. If the religions are resistant to the change that pluralism requires will inevitably be disempowered. Either by the state or the communication networks. It's at that point you have a hierarchy of religious dogma, backed by the state and communications networks, and it's going to elevate the religions that more closely align with your progressive sensibilities above the religions who do not. What you are suggesting is nothing more than liberals controlling the religions with soft power from the outside in a way that allows them to deny their own culpability. What happens to the Muslim fundamentalists who think gays should be thrown off buildings? What happens to the Christian fundamentalists who object to abortion on religious grounds? They both take a backseat to the other religions that allow your liberal bullshit pluralism to dictate (from the top down) which religions can accrue power. Your pluralism IS the precursor to the hierarchy you condemn. And that was my initial criticism of the Atheist pluralists. 'The religions would be fine if they believed what I believe. I should be the God. As long as the religion is promoting my progressive politics then it's fine.'
You want the moral authority for yourselves. You're trying to dress it up as this benign thing and it isn't. So no. No pluralism. The only solution to religion is to create a system that is impervious to and unaffected by believe. You can have your little incest cult and you can have your liberal politics but I, as an individual, do not have to lend any credence to your religion, don't have to do what your God says, and to discriminate against me or transgress upon me for doing so is a violation of my religious liberty. We need to get this subjective prescriptive behavior out of people's lives and turn society into an input/output mechanism where people can contribute independently from and regardless of their beliefs and receive output commensurate with their contributions. So, if THAT is what you mean by pluralism, then fine. But it doesn't sound like it. Maybe I'm missing something. Additionally, focusing on Hindu voices when speaking about Hinduism is just a way of preemptively undermining dissent against Hinduism. I can just as easily say that we should prioritize dissent."
by Hym Iam February 3, 2025
Get the Pluralism mug.