In an argument, when one refuses to make a simple search for evidence of their claim; however, they demand that the opposition does so. This creates a paradoxical position in which their belief is true and, when confronted with facts, either remains true or is discovered to be false.
In the event that it is discovered to be false, a second paradox often occurs in which the claim remains true by way of continuing to state it despite the evidence.
In the event that it is discovered to be false, a second paradox often occurs in which the claim remains true by way of continuing to state it despite the evidence.
"Nobody has proven me wrong yet. Give me a source, I admit defeat. Don't, I stay right! Of course, I can obviously google for myself... but I have Schrödinger's evidence on my side!"
by WEGWEHQWE#HWRE July 23, 2022
by E-vee-dent-fool December 28, 2021
The sort of evidence presented by a fickle person based on their hunch. The opposite of empirical evidence.
She only had whimpirical evidence why I shouldn't do it
by hicksandhudson January 12, 2011
compelling body of information or proof (resistant to facetious, punny answers involving actual "concrete") that causes one to believe that something is true
by nochers March 02, 2021
by gojo simp January 05, 2022