Electing Obama
by Elite Murder December 28, 2008
Get the Worst Mistake Ever mug.The bestest friend any guy could ever wish to have in the whole wide world. If you only had one of these you'd be the happyest guy alive!!!!!!
:0) :0) :0) :0) :0) :0) :0) :0) :0) :0)
:0) :0) :0) :0) :0) :0) :0) :0) :0) :0)
by P.IRV June 1, 2004
Get the Mintylisious nicabocka mucka mug.Related Words
A common typo in online auction sites. The intended word is mint, as in 'fresh from the factory'. Now an accepted usage. Almost always seen in all caps.
by hellfish July 23, 2012
Get the Minty mug.in printer terms, the worst job to be printing... in other words, corrupted files, jacked-up fonts, misplaced images, crappy photos, and past deadline-drops.
by Angela October 20, 2001
Get the Mistake Daily mug.adj. or noun
a person who is, or to be, very open-minded, non-judgmental and trustworthy-- especially with regards to reefer use
a person who is, or to be, very open-minded, non-judgmental and trustworthy-- especially with regards to reefer use
by galcoolest August 4, 2005
Get the mistamarley mug.by altmannunchucks May 11, 2010
Get the milty scrofa mug.(n.) A rule, charter, ordinance, or law used to effect a result opposite the intent of the rule, charter, ordinance, or law.
mistechnical (adj.), mistechnically (adv.) indicates that a rule, charter, ordinance, or law is, was, or will be used to effect a result opposite the intent of the rule, charter, ordinance, or law.
mistechnical (adj.), mistechnically (adv.) indicates that a rule, charter, ordinance, or law is, was, or will be used to effect a result opposite the intent of the rule, charter, ordinance, or law.
A good example of mistechnicality is the current use of copyright law: intended to protect individuals' creations from copying by large powerful entities (i.e. corporations), now used to protect corporations from having any competition from the individual.
It was mistechnical use of the law that won the trial.
The exective order promoting the employee should have been stamped by five officers, but, by negligence, it was only stamped by four, so the employee mistechnically didn't get promoted.
It was mistechnical use of the law that won the trial.
The exective order promoting the employee should have been stamped by five officers, but, by negligence, it was only stamped by four, so the employee mistechnically didn't get promoted.
by TeeGeeRoo August 20, 2010
Get the mistechnicality mug.