by SoMePeRs0n/guy March 19, 2007
For any first-time web user looking to see what the internet (and, sub sequentially, its users) is really like, than look no further. From crude, childish humor to people who hate your band, Encyclopedia Dramatica is the perfect representation of what the interwebs is REALLY all about. Lampooning everything including itself, ED puts a funny and often offensive twist on every conglomerated experience (good, bad, or otherwise) you've ever had on the internet. Free from guilt, remorse, or liability, its authors poke fun at (read: insult) everything from Live Journal feuds to politics, gay marriage to women's rights. Be it video games or porn search engines, nothing is sacred, everything is up for grabs, and if its popular or blog-worthy, you'll most likely find someone tearing it a new one on Encyclopedia Dramatica.
Most weekend lesbians are also attention whores, and will never actually do the deed should the situation arise. This only compounds on their total stupidity, as telling someone about how you drunkenly kissed another girl is like bragging to a black person about a really deep tan you had once.
- Encyclopedia Dramatica on "Weekend Lesbians"
- Encyclopedia Dramatica on "Weekend Lesbians"
by VR_Jay May 12, 2007
The nazis of the internet. They lash out at anything and anyone, but they do it for the lulz, so it's all good.
by TeleIce September 28, 2007
A site where rejects from Wikipedia who prefer stereotypical bitching over factual information post the most meaningless shit you will ever see in your entire life.
Go to Encyclopedia Dramatica and look up some band. This is what you'll see.
"(Band name here) is a piece of shit band thats gay and sucks dick. Here is a picture of one of the band members having gay sex. Please note that this is NOT photoshopped. *Photoshopped picture here*"
They claim that wikipedia has no good information that revolves around the internet or internet culture. But what they don't realize is that Wikipedia is a fucking online encyclopedia, unlike UrbanDictionary which is a site where people like me post their opinions rather than real information. Wikipedia is for real information that will help you out in real life with things such as reports or research.
In short, Encyclopedia Dramatica sucks.
Go to Encyclopedia Dramatica and look up some band. This is what you'll see.
"(Band name here) is a piece of shit band thats gay and sucks dick. Here is a picture of one of the band members having gay sex. Please note that this is NOT photoshopped. *Photoshopped picture here*"
They claim that wikipedia has no good information that revolves around the internet or internet culture. But what they don't realize is that Wikipedia is a fucking online encyclopedia, unlike UrbanDictionary which is a site where people like me post their opinions rather than real information. Wikipedia is for real information that will help you out in real life with things such as reports or research.
In short, Encyclopedia Dramatica sucks.
by I doesn't has no name September 15, 2006
The most racist, bigoted, unfunny piece of shit excuse for a website I've ever had the unfortune to come across. Hell, even Uncyclopedia and Something Awful are funnier than this garbage... They claim that they do it for 'teh lulz'(it seems that misspelling words is now 'cool', NOT!) and is only joking. Yea, uh-huh, like desecrating dead Jews of the Holocaust and hating on homosexuals is funny(not to mention their witch-hunts on other ethnic groups)... Again, NOT! That's all they can do, insult and insult in a stupid, unfunny manner. Well, aside from whacking off to pictures and videos of themselves fucking their pets, that is...
Now, I'm a strong supporter/defender of the First Amendment but this is just fucking rediculous. Because on top of crudely insulting everyone/everything, they also harass and defile actual internet members on their site(ex; writing hateful/untrue articles about people and posting their email up on the article where just any psychopath could just contact them) and even on sites beyond their own. Again, doing for 'teh lulz'. *rolls eyes* Give me a fuckin' break. But, I guess like assholes, people have their own opinions... Whatever, peace out.
Now, I'm a strong supporter/defender of the First Amendment but this is just fucking rediculous. Because on top of crudely insulting everyone/everything, they also harass and defile actual internet members on their site(ex; writing hateful/untrue articles about people and posting their email up on the article where just any psychopath could just contact them) and even on sites beyond their own. Again, doing for 'teh lulz'. *rolls eyes* Give me a fuckin' break. But, I guess like assholes, people have their own opinions... Whatever, peace out.
Encyclopedia Dramatica: No example needed here...
by Cyber Dante November 02, 2007
From a christian perspective it is all of the sin in the world put onto one website. Absolutely filthy and disturbing, the images that are put on this site should never have existed. The least productive website on the face of the earth. Absolutely pitiful
by jack johnny jill jane joe jake October 18, 2009
Encyclopedia Dramatica (ED) is a wiki formed by LJDrama people who were writing Wikipedia articles about LiveJournal incidents, but found that such content was deleted. They started their own wiki to document online drama; hence the name.
ED is loved or hated. Those who "get" it treasure it like old issues of MAD Magazine. Those who don't get it, such as fans of funny-wiki Uncyclopedia, disparage it at length.
Articles on ED fall into several general types. (View with caution: NOT SAFE FOR WORK.)
(1) Internet people: ED documents many Internet users and their online activities. Targets include users of LiveJournal, MySpace, DeviantART, and Wikipedia, as well as sexual predators, and actual racists. (Mediacrat, Tay Zonday, Chris Forcand)
(2) Public train wrecks: Like a tabloid, ED documents and mocks offline people, groups and events that are deemed worthy of ridicule. (My Chemical Romance, Lindsay Lohan, Carlos Sousa Jr.)
(3) Internet terms: ED documents Internet sites, culture, lingo and memes, often in a fairly factual manner. Included are many 4chan memes. (So i herd u liek mudkip, Profit, YTMND)
(4) Hate articles: ED takes on and caricatures a racist, sexist, homophobic, sanctimonious, and frequently outright insane perspective. (JEWS DID WTC, Rape, Furry)
(5) Shock images: ED houses many noted shock images. (Goatse, Offended, 1guy1jar <-- Careful, you can't un-see them.)
ED is loved or hated. Those who "get" it treasure it like old issues of MAD Magazine. Those who don't get it, such as fans of funny-wiki Uncyclopedia, disparage it at length.
Articles on ED fall into several general types. (View with caution: NOT SAFE FOR WORK.)
(1) Internet people: ED documents many Internet users and their online activities. Targets include users of LiveJournal, MySpace, DeviantART, and Wikipedia, as well as sexual predators, and actual racists. (Mediacrat, Tay Zonday, Chris Forcand)
(2) Public train wrecks: Like a tabloid, ED documents and mocks offline people, groups and events that are deemed worthy of ridicule. (My Chemical Romance, Lindsay Lohan, Carlos Sousa Jr.)
(3) Internet terms: ED documents Internet sites, culture, lingo and memes, often in a fairly factual manner. Included are many 4chan memes. (So i herd u liek mudkip, Profit, YTMND)
(4) Hate articles: ED takes on and caricatures a racist, sexist, homophobic, sanctimonious, and frequently outright insane perspective. (JEWS DID WTC, Rape, Furry)
(5) Shock images: ED houses many noted shock images. (Goatse, Offended, 1guy1jar <-- Careful, you can't un-see them.)
A: "I saw the most horrible thing ever at Encyclopedia Dramatica. I'm scarred and offended."
B: "That'll happen."
C: "I saw the funniest thing ever there! I laughed 'til I cried."
B: "That'll happen too."
B: "That'll happen."
C: "I saw the funniest thing ever there! I laughed 'til I cried."
B: "That'll happen too."
by GtotheT October 10, 2009