The kind of logic that reasons from commonly accepted opinions to probable conclusions. It is distinguished from Analytic, which reasons from true and primary premises.
1. Used to describe the illogical or false arguments of an opponent during a debate that are counter to your position and are spoken by the opponent to annoy, rather than to actually counter your argument.
1) The two exchanged dialectics with regards to the recent statements made by the president.
2) For Hegel, the concrete, the synthesis, the absolute, must always pass through the phase of the negative, in the journey to completion, that is, mediation. Day must always be met with night; either one cannot stay forever. A peaceful kingdom will always be met with a violent revolution. The sun will eventually explode and earth will ultimately become stardust for yet another star and its planetary system. Nothing is stagnant or fixed in the grand scheme of things; its current state is the reflection and outcome of a long chain of events in the past, and is still destined to an endless cycle of renewal. This is the essence of what is popularly called Hegelian dialectics.
A state in which you are stuck questioning the truth of your own or others opinions, in which you further question layer after layer of what formed the opinion forever caught within the Bagel as you can never truly find where it came from.
Person A: Hey, what 's up with KDog? He has been sitting in that corner staring at the wall for hours now.
Person B:Yeah, he's caught in a dialectic Bagel after finishing the complete works of Hegel.
Person A: Ahhh, poor guy.
the new (and current) reality which consciously (and unconsciously) dominates our language, thoughts and reasons for being in this post-modern, 21st century, third millennium world.
new dialectic in washington, d.c. : politics is show business for ugly people.
new dialectic in hollywood : show business is politics for beautiful people.