Skip to main content

Naturality 

Naturality, a youtuber with over 10,000 subs who trolls in Frappe (Crappe), Fizze, Panda Express and more. She also has a server called "Naturality's Fun House" which is pretty cool.
Naturality is a queen.
Naturality by husseiscute March 27, 2020

Naturalistic Pandivinism 

Naturalistic Pandivinism, also known as Scientific Pandivinism, is a form of pandivinism that supports that the divine is a natural and a concrete thing and it’s a fundamental substance of nature, but different from classical pandivinism, naturalistic pandivinism believes that science is about the study and the exploration of the divine and that technology is a mean to make people near to the divine and near to the gods. Naturalistic Pandivinism also believes in the unity of physical-extraphysical, natural-extranatural and material-extramaterial, the development of spiritual sciences, such as divinology, extraphysics, psychoextraphysics, esoterology, spiritology and deistology in order to study the divine directly and the development of post-physical, post-spacetime and extraphysical technologies in order to make humanity the most closer as possible to the divine and of gods themselves and to turn humanity into a divine civilization by superating the physical, the spacetime, becoming extraphysical and embracing the divine. Naturalistic Pandivinism also supports the idea of epistemological pluralism in order to study things that are directly related to the spiritual, the divine and the beyond spacetime and it also believes that gods, divine beings and the divine exist beyond spacetime and that’s the reason why humanity should explore what’s beyond the spacetime.
“Not gonna lie, but naturalistic pandivinism is just a reformulated version of naturalistic pantheism based on the technological, scientific, spiritual and esoteric advancements of modernity, and of course, based on divinialism as well.”

Naturalist 

A naturalist is someone who lives a natural lifestyle and does not conform to society standards of living, whether that be beauty, health, or anything else. A naturalist may only use natural pure products on their bodies and wear no makeup or makeup with natural ingredients. A naturalist can be a environmentalist who only uses natural materials to lessen their carbon imprint. Naturalists may or may not put foreign chemicals or substances on or inside their bodies. 80% or more of their life consists of consuming whole foods and using plants as a form of medicine. A naturalist lives as nature intended or as close to it as they can in their environment.
One day I met this woman who called herself a naturalist. We were at a special event and she stood out to me because she was the only woman who wasn't wearing any makeup and she wore her hair in two braids, but she looked beautiful and her skin was glowing. I discovered that she only uses natural ingredients. For her skin, she applies 100% shea butter or Coconut oil and she eats a whole food plant- based diet.

Oh, I forgot you were a naturalist. So, what do you do when you have an upset stomach.

"I just drink ginger tea or I suck on a lemon. That will usually settle my stomach faster than conventional medicine would"
Naturalist by Vividgoddess23 May 22, 2024

Naturalistic Apophenia/Pareidolia Theory

The standard, non-critical psychological position. It posits that apophenia (false connections) and pareidolia (false patterns/faces) are evolutionary cognitive biases. They are errors arising from a brain wired for hyper-sensitive pattern detection—a survival mechanism where it's safer to mistakenly see a predator in the bushes (a false positive) than to miss a real one (a fatal false negative). These theories treat the phenomena as fascinating bugs in our neural hardware, often studied to understand perception, psychosis, and the origins of superstition.
Naturalistic Apophenia/Pareidolia Theory Example: Naturalistic Pareidolia Theory explains why people worldwide see faces in electrical outlets or the Martian landscape. The brain's fusiform face area is so primed to detect faces that it fires even with minimal stimulus. This is not a philosophical statement about meaning, but a biological one about a misfiring cognitive module that usually helps us recognize friends and foes.

Naturalistic Sandboxism

The position that the sandbox is nature—that the natural world, as described by science, is the only arena for existence. There's no supernatural outside, no realm beyond physics, no escape from natural law. But within nature, the possibilities are staggering: evolution, consciousness, culture, art, love. Naturalistic Sandboxism finds wonder not in escaping nature but in exploring its depths, building within its constraints, and marveling at what nature itself can produce when it plays in the sand.
Naturalistic Sandboxism "You keep looking for miracles, for something outside nature. Naturalistic Sandboxism says: nature is the sandbox. Consciousness is a miracle made of neurons. Love is a miracle made of chemistry. Art is a miracle made of paint. The box is enough—it's infinite inside."

Naturalistic Orthodoxy

The established, institutionalized set of beliefs that define mainstream naturalism—the view that nature is all that exists, that supernatural explanations are illegitimate, and that scientific methods are the only reliable paths to knowledge. Naturalistic orthodoxy includes core commitments: methodological naturalism (science should only invoke natural causes), ontological naturalism (only natural things exist), and epistemological naturalism (scientific knowledge is the only genuine knowledge). Like all orthodoxies, it serves necessary functions: enabling scientific inquiry, ruling out supernatural explanations, and providing a unified worldview. But like all orthodoxies, it can become dogmatic, resisting challenges and marginalizing views that question its assumptions. Naturalistic orthodoxy determines what counts as legitimate inquiry, what explanations are acceptable, and who counts as a "real" intellectual versus a mystic or theologian.
Example: "She suggested that indigenous knowledge systems might offer valid insights that don't fit naturalistic frameworks—and was accused of 'abandoning science' by her colleagues. Naturalistic orthodoxy doesn't allow that there might be other ways of knowing; it assumes its own methods are the only legitimate ones."