Birthed by the enlightened minds at the London School of Economics Bankside House at the
eve of
2022, this
1-5 scale, initially of a quarterly being (later amended to 6 and then 5), provided a progressive and refreshing new scale. The love
child of several future Nobel laureates, the scale became widely adopted due to its simplicity as well as its acceptance of the fluctuating opinions that arise when analysing beauty both
male,
female and of any other kind:
The Scale works as follows:
1 - I would not get with them and I struggle to see why anybody else would (Not further divisible)
2 - I would not get with them but I see why somebody else would (Split into high, low and middle)
3 - I would get with them but I see why somebody else would not (Split into high, low and middle)
4 - I would get with them and I can’t see why anybody else would not (Not further divisible, as any disputes of preference within the 4 category are simply arbitrary)
5 - A
rank that exists merely in theory but's existence is fundamental:
- A person who, by
definition is a 4, but with an
extra requirement:
- he, she or other, is so out of your league that you are simply satisfied to get with them just once, without ever pursuing or attempting to woo them again; your singular interaction should be a moment comparable to Jivanmukta, although
one can only theorise
person
1: did you see who person
2 was getting with last night
person 3: yh they were a mid 2
person
1: mid 2? thats a bit harsh
person 3: no mid 2 on the LSE New Scale
*person
1 and 3 smile at the camera breaking the fourth wall and ruining the scene*
