flightfacilities's definitions
The paradigm that the number of senses outside of the world-interior can be counted if reduced to formas prime set-twin-prime set orthogonalities.
Effected by John Locke who concluded that a person's world-interior contained a SINGLE forma.
John Locke proved the existence of democracy analytically.
Effected by John Locke who concluded that a person's world-interior contained a SINGLE forma.
John Locke proved the existence of democracy analytically.
Immanuel Kant proved that human beings judge the world by a paradigm "sense-in-itself." John Locke came along and showed that the world-exterior contains an infinite number of senses-in-itself formas while the world-interior contains one forma. This result is unusual because it was in the 1900's that Alasdair MacIntyre finally separated public communication into the world-interior and the world exterior.
This communicado was ahead of its time as Kant reduced ethics to a counting-problem--not a problem of consideration.
This communicado was ahead of its time as Kant reduced ethics to a counting-problem--not a problem of consideration.
by flightfacilities May 16, 2022
Get the ethics mug.Paradigm that correlations are mediums.
Instead of dismissing a correlation as deja vu, alt-modernism argues correlations have an ontology.
Working on the assumption that a correlation can act as a MEDIUM for understanding: alt-modernism concludes that correlations are the pseudo-random numbers.
Working on the assumption that a correlation can act as a MEDIUM for understanding: alt-modernism concludes that correlations are the pseudo-random numbers.
by flightfacilities February 19, 2022
Get the alt-modernism mug.The paradigm that consideration is a dialectic between the present moment & sense.
The idea that the mind is a dialectic between countable set of points brought by polynominalism (path-of-sense) and the uncountable (Tarski-exterior) set of points brought by the present moment The Maya to the non-Tarski space by the process of sublumination.
The idea that the mind is a dialectic between countable set of points brought by polynominalism (path-of-sense) and the uncountable (Tarski-exterior) set of points brought by the present moment The Maya to the non-Tarski space by the process of sublumination.
Kantian interpolation is a dialectic in which the senses win out via supersymmetry over the uncountable information provided by the present moment.
Put another way; the Kantian interpolation is an alternation between consideration & counting.
Kantian interpolation tells us that the mind is a battlefield between the present moment which provides an uncountable number of Tarski-points from the Maya and the senses which provide an infinite number of points to the non-Tarski space.
(The infinite set of points comes to non-Tarski space from supersymmetry via polynominalism.)
The Kantian approach hints that the infinite set of points win out in the human mind over the uncountable set of points through the process-of-aesthetic-judgment forma-spinning.
Thus: consideration wins out in the human mind; because counting is not alway consideration but consideration is always counting. Ie. the subconscious does not need the mind to count...
Put another way; the Kantian interpolation is an alternation between consideration & counting.
Kantian interpolation tells us that the mind is a battlefield between the present moment which provides an uncountable number of Tarski-points from the Maya and the senses which provide an infinite number of points to the non-Tarski space.
(The infinite set of points comes to non-Tarski space from supersymmetry via polynominalism.)
The Kantian approach hints that the infinite set of points win out in the human mind over the uncountable set of points through the process-of-aesthetic-judgment forma-spinning.
Thus: consideration wins out in the human mind; because counting is not alway consideration but consideration is always counting. Ie. the subconscious does not need the mind to count...
by flightfacilities May 12, 2022
Get the kantian interpolation mug.Metanominalism is the counterpart to Boolean nihilism (the thesis that math cannot count numbers).
Metanominalism proffers that only reason for numbers' exist is that they can count themselves.
Metanominalism proffers that only reason for numbers' exist is that they can count themselves.
by flightfacilities February 18, 2022
Get the metanominalism mug.A philosopher who tried to solve the question of, if a tree falls in the forest; and no one hears it did, it make a sound?
More broadly Wittgenstein answered the question: Did language come from outside of pan-contiguity (the universe) or inside of pan-contiguity...
More broadly Wittgenstein answered the question: Did language come from outside of pan-contiguity (the universe) or inside of pan-contiguity...
Wittgenstein viewed language as a human ritual; and ritual as subject to game theory.
He introduced the concept of the external participant in contrast to physics' external observer. Thus, each participant becomes a part of embedded-language-in-the universe.
He introduced the concept of the external participant in contrast to physics' external observer. Thus, each participant becomes a part of embedded-language-in-the universe.
by flightfacilities May 13, 2022
Get the Wittgenstein mug.The postulation that the global dialectic is a conflict between the far East and the Near East over who invented monotheism.
This would stand in contract to Occidentalism's dialectic of a conflict between Western "monotheism" and Eastern 'polytheism.'
This would stand in contract to Occidentalism's dialectic of a conflict between Western "monotheism" and Eastern 'polytheism.'
Orientalism propounds that the dialectic of East vs. West can be correctly reduced to Iranicism vs. Arabism..
by flightfacilities February 18, 2022
Get the orientalism mug.A zen koan is an attempt to answer the question of whether a tree-falling makes a sound if no one heard it.
A zen koan concludes that a tree falling can only make a sound if two or more people vocalize it AFTER THE FACT in the ritual of language.
This follows Vikaas's rule some things can only be verified in retrospect even if the participants were not actually there...
A zen koan concludes that a tree falling can only make a sound if two or more people vocalize it AFTER THE FACT in the ritual of language.
This follows Vikaas's rule some things can only be verified in retrospect even if the participants were not actually there...
Zen koan follows Wittgenstein's principle of language as a ritual; furthermore it confirms Vikaas's rule that the participating verifiers can come after the circumstantial fact...
The zen koan follows Wittgenstein's principle of the external participant; in contrast to the external observer in physics.
Because language is embedded in the universe as per Wittgenstein, simple discussion between two or more parties is enough to create MATERIAL fact; even if that materialization comes after the circumstance, per the Vikaas rule.
The zen koan follows Wittgenstein's principle of the external participant; in contrast to the external observer in physics.
Because language is embedded in the universe as per Wittgenstein, simple discussion between two or more parties is enough to create MATERIAL fact; even if that materialization comes after the circumstance, per the Vikaas rule.
by flightfacilities May 13, 2022
Get the zen Koan mug.