To lose an argument, or sound stupid when trying to say something because you spoke first, or the person you are arguing against is unreasonably stupid, a bigot or a dissentomatic
Sarah: Lowering taxes will save taxpayers money
Douchebag: No it won't because lowering taxes will raise the national debt, dumbass.
Sarah: What does national debt have to do with how much money taxpayers are saved?
Douchebag: So it won't raise the national debt? You sound stupid, fucking retard hahaha. Sarah is so fucking stupid she seriously thinks that lowering taxes won't raise the national debt.
Sarah: (pulls out pistol)
Narrator: Before First 48 filmed the subsequent murder, Sarah was proclamaimed by the Douchebag
Douchebag: No it won't because lowering taxes will raise the national debt, dumbass.
Sarah: What does national debt have to do with how much money taxpayers are saved?
Douchebag: So it won't raise the national debt? You sound stupid, fucking retard hahaha. Sarah is so fucking stupid she seriously thinks that lowering taxes won't raise the national debt.
Sarah: (pulls out pistol)
Narrator: Before First 48 filmed the subsequent murder, Sarah was proclamaimed by the Douchebag
by Optical_Epilepsy December 11, 2011

Somebody who is always willing to text you back. These are people you text when your doing something you don't really wanna do but have to do it (school, work, etc) and it would be very nice if somebody would keep texting you back instead of having to wait minutes-hours at a time
by Optical_Epilepsy June 28, 2010

A definition of something that has been presented in a way so people who have trouble reading proper grammar, correct spelling, and proper punctuation can understand it.
(Normal definition of rain)
Rain: water falling in drops from vapor condensed in the atmosphere
(Illiterated definition of rain)
rain itz wen da water iz flln 4rm da c1ouds n 3vree buddy g3ts w3t
Rain: water falling in drops from vapor condensed in the atmosphere
(Illiterated definition of rain)
rain itz wen da water iz flln 4rm da c1ouds n 3vree buddy g3ts w3t
by Optical_Epilepsy April 02, 2011

When you argue with somebody and the other person gets his friends, family, etc to agree with him and disagree with you
This is really immature and pretty messed up because if you say 2+2=4 and he says 2+2=5 and then gets everybody to agree with him, you might be technically right but your still gonna be socially wrong
If you do this, it's because you can't accept being wrong and feel the need to be right about everything like your allergic to wrong. It's really not that bad unless you gotta be ego trippin. Just grow up and quit being a little kid
If your the victim of this your screwed and can't win the argument because 1 person will never convince 3 people that agree on the same thing against you, that there wrong. They think there right because they make up the majority
This is really immature and pretty messed up because if you say 2+2=4 and he says 2+2=5 and then gets everybody to agree with him, you might be technically right but your still gonna be socially wrong
If you do this, it's because you can't accept being wrong and feel the need to be right about everything like your allergic to wrong. It's really not that bad unless you gotta be ego trippin. Just grow up and quit being a little kid
If your the victim of this your screwed and can't win the argument because 1 person will never convince 3 people that agree on the same thing against you, that there wrong. They think there right because they make up the majority
Stan:2+2=4
Doug:2+2=5 dude your stupid. hey Jerry don't 2+2=5?
Jerry: Yea
Doug:Stan said it was 4 what an idiot
Jerry: Your wrong Stan
Stan: I would be right if I wasn't getting arguejumped
Doug:2+2=5 dude your stupid. hey Jerry don't 2+2=5?
Jerry: Yea
Doug:Stan said it was 4 what an idiot
Jerry: Your wrong Stan
Stan: I would be right if I wasn't getting arguejumped
by Optical_Epilepsy July 23, 2010

This is when somebody argues by DEFLECTING anything said against them.
They will NEVER address any issues brought against them or their point but will instantly bring something else up to change the subject
Deflective racists use this tactic whenever a situation/fact is brought up that goes against there beliefs
People do this because they know damn well if they try to address the issue or stay relevant to it, there entire argument will get derailed
They will NEVER address any issues brought against them or their point but will instantly bring something else up to change the subject
Deflective racists use this tactic whenever a situation/fact is brought up that goes against there beliefs
People do this because they know damn well if they try to address the issue or stay relevant to it, there entire argument will get derailed
deflective arguing
by Optical_Epilepsy July 20, 2010

This is a test performed on somebody who is not replying to your text messages or has broken the 24 hour reply rule.
The test is to wait a MINIMUM OF 168 HOURS (this is very important) after the last time you sent them a text, and then send them a very universal conversation starter.
If they break the 24 hour reply rule again, then you have proven that they do not want to text you. That's because the chance of them coincidentally not having 15 seconds of time to reply to your text in 2 24 hour periods that are a week apart (assuming they have access and service to their phone) is less than 1 in a billion.
The only possible way this can be the case is if their phone is physically removed from their possession or destroyed. Although this is quite possible, if you keep in touch with the person through other means (facebook, myspace, or especially a face to face conversation) you can find out for sure.
The test is to wait a MINIMUM OF 168 HOURS (this is very important) after the last time you sent them a text, and then send them a very universal conversation starter.
If they break the 24 hour reply rule again, then you have proven that they do not want to text you. That's because the chance of them coincidentally not having 15 seconds of time to reply to your text in 2 24 hour periods that are a week apart (assuming they have access and service to their phone) is less than 1 in a billion.
The only possible way this can be the case is if their phone is physically removed from their possession or destroyed. Although this is quite possible, if you keep in touch with the person through other means (facebook, myspace, or especially a face to face conversation) you can find out for sure.
Peter: Damn this girl ain't texting me back, wow
Steve: Has it been 24 hours since you last texted her?
Peter: Yea, why?
Steve: Do the 7 day reply test, wait a week and send her a conversation starter if she doesn't reply 24 hours after that then her phone must be lost/stolen/broken or she ain't tryna text you
Steve: Has it been 24 hours since you last texted her?
Peter: Yea, why?
Steve: Do the 7 day reply test, wait a week and send her a conversation starter if she doesn't reply 24 hours after that then her phone must be lost/stolen/broken or she ain't tryna text you
by Optical_Epilepsy September 03, 2010

When you send somebody a text message and they do not reply within 24 hours there is a 95% chance that they readeleted your text and have willfully chosen not to reply
There is a less than 5% chance that they have lost their phone/phone was stolen, have been busy for a full 24 hours (so they couldn't even use their phone for 5 seconds, cause that's all it takes) or sent the message but the "delivery failed".
If it has been 24 hours and they have not replied, that's when you begin the 7 day reply test to confirm whether they want to text you or not.
There is a less than 5% chance that they have lost their phone/phone was stolen, have been busy for a full 24 hours (so they couldn't even use their phone for 5 seconds, cause that's all it takes) or sent the message but the "delivery failed".
If it has been 24 hours and they have not replied, that's when you begin the 7 day reply test to confirm whether they want to text you or not.
Dan: Why have you been looking at your phone so much?
Steve: I'm waiting on Leann to reply
Dan: How long has it been since u sent her a text?
Steve: More than 24 hours.....
Dan: Don't you know the 24 hour reply rule? She more than likely readeleted your text man, do the 7 day reply test to see if she really wants to text you
Steve: I'm waiting on Leann to reply
Dan: How long has it been since u sent her a text?
Steve: More than 24 hours.....
Dan: Don't you know the 24 hour reply rule? She more than likely readeleted your text man, do the 7 day reply test to see if she really wants to text you
by Optical_Epilepsy September 03, 2010
