Optical_Epilepsy's definitions
A male who is cute, sexy, fine or otherwise considered attractive, but not a guy you would snatch up like a kidnapper.
This could be because you aren't sure he's the one you want yet, or because you do not chase men.
This could be because you aren't sure he's the one you want yet, or because you do not chase men.
Kayla: Damn he's hot
Carla: Go getcha man girl
Kayla: Well I don't chase men cuz they chase me lol
Carla: Aw so he just a woman's candidate
Kayla: Yea exactly
Carla: Go getcha man girl
Kayla: Well I don't chase men cuz they chase me lol
Carla: Aw so he just a woman's candidate
Kayla: Yea exactly
by Optical_Epilepsy June 5, 2011
Get the woman's candidate mug.This is a test performed on somebody who is not replying to your text messages or has broken the 24 hour reply rule.
The test is to wait a MINIMUM OF 168 HOURS (this is very important) after the last time you sent them a text, and then send them a very universal conversation starter.
If they break the 24 hour reply rule again, then you have proven that they do not want to text you. That's because the chance of them coincidentally not having 15 seconds of time to reply to your text in 2 24 hour periods that are a week apart (assuming they have access and service to their phone) is less than 1 in a billion.
The only possible way this can be the case is if their phone is physically removed from their possession or destroyed. Although this is quite possible, if you keep in touch with the person through other means (facebook, myspace, or especially a face to face conversation) you can find out for sure.
The test is to wait a MINIMUM OF 168 HOURS (this is very important) after the last time you sent them a text, and then send them a very universal conversation starter.
If they break the 24 hour reply rule again, then you have proven that they do not want to text you. That's because the chance of them coincidentally not having 15 seconds of time to reply to your text in 2 24 hour periods that are a week apart (assuming they have access and service to their phone) is less than 1 in a billion.
The only possible way this can be the case is if their phone is physically removed from their possession or destroyed. Although this is quite possible, if you keep in touch with the person through other means (facebook, myspace, or especially a face to face conversation) you can find out for sure.
Peter: Damn this girl ain't texting me back, wow
Steve: Has it been 24 hours since you last texted her?
Peter: Yea, why?
Steve: Do the 7 day reply test, wait a week and send her a conversation starter if she doesn't reply 24 hours after that then her phone must be lost/stolen/broken or she ain't tryna text you
Steve: Has it been 24 hours since you last texted her?
Peter: Yea, why?
Steve: Do the 7 day reply test, wait a week and send her a conversation starter if she doesn't reply 24 hours after that then her phone must be lost/stolen/broken or she ain't tryna text you
by Optical_Epilepsy September 3, 2010
Get the 7 day reply test mug.When a person who normally spells everything correctly, using proper grammar and punctuation, decides to send messages that heavily use slang, shortened spelling (u instead of you,) and little if any punctuation so the person they are texting will stick around long enough to get to know them.
This is commonly used by men who are trying to get with woman who are attractive, but are not interested in men who come off as nerdy, proper, and useful to society.
ILLITERATED DEFINITION: w3n dey talk l1ke a c00l p3rson
This is commonly used by men who are trying to get with woman who are attractive, but are not interested in men who come off as nerdy, proper, and useful to society.
ILLITERATED DEFINITION: w3n dey talk l1ke a c00l p3rson
by Optical_Epilepsy April 2, 2011
Get the illiterated texting mug.Proof that Sony is getting desperate, does not have any sort of honor, and can't be original anymore. In case you could not tell, the Playstation Move is nothing more than a Wiimote with a ball on top. It's as close to copyright infringment as you can get.
by Optical_Epilepsy June 5, 2011
Get the Playstation Move mug.To lose an argument, or sound stupid when trying to say something because you spoke first, or the person you are arguing against is unreasonably stupid, a bigot or a dissentomatic
Sarah: Lowering taxes will save taxpayers money
Douchebag: No it won't because lowering taxes will raise the national debt, dumbass.
Sarah: What does national debt have to do with how much money taxpayers are saved?
Douchebag: So it won't raise the national debt? You sound stupid, fucking retard hahaha. Sarah is so fucking stupid she seriously thinks that lowering taxes won't raise the national debt.
Sarah: (pulls out pistol)
Narrator: Before First 48 filmed the subsequent murder, Sarah was proclamaimed by the Douchebag
Douchebag: No it won't because lowering taxes will raise the national debt, dumbass.
Sarah: What does national debt have to do with how much money taxpayers are saved?
Douchebag: So it won't raise the national debt? You sound stupid, fucking retard hahaha. Sarah is so fucking stupid she seriously thinks that lowering taxes won't raise the national debt.
Sarah: (pulls out pistol)
Narrator: Before First 48 filmed the subsequent murder, Sarah was proclamaimed by the Douchebag
by Optical_Epilepsy December 11, 2011
Get the proclamaimed mug.When you argue with somebody and the other person gets his friends, family, etc to agree with him and disagree with you
This is really immature and pretty messed up because if you say 2+2=4 and he says 2+2=5 and then gets everybody to agree with him, you might be technically right but your still gonna be socially wrong
If you do this, it's because you can't accept being wrong and feel the need to be right about everything like your allergic to wrong. It's really not that bad unless you gotta be ego trippin. Just grow up and quit being a little kid
If your the victim of this your screwed and can't win the argument because 1 person will never convince 3 people that agree on the same thing against you, that there wrong. They think there right because they make up the majority
This is really immature and pretty messed up because if you say 2+2=4 and he says 2+2=5 and then gets everybody to agree with him, you might be technically right but your still gonna be socially wrong
If you do this, it's because you can't accept being wrong and feel the need to be right about everything like your allergic to wrong. It's really not that bad unless you gotta be ego trippin. Just grow up and quit being a little kid
If your the victim of this your screwed and can't win the argument because 1 person will never convince 3 people that agree on the same thing against you, that there wrong. They think there right because they make up the majority
Stan:2+2=4
Doug:2+2=5 dude your stupid. hey Jerry don't 2+2=5?
Jerry: Yea
Doug:Stan said it was 4 what an idiot
Jerry: Your wrong Stan
Stan: I would be right if I wasn't getting arguejumped
Doug:2+2=5 dude your stupid. hey Jerry don't 2+2=5?
Jerry: Yea
Doug:Stan said it was 4 what an idiot
Jerry: Your wrong Stan
Stan: I would be right if I wasn't getting arguejumped
by Optical_Epilepsy July 23, 2010
Get the arguejumped mug.Believe it or not this actually results in murder. Some people honestly have a weakness to names and are physically hurt by them. People will not only be willing to hurt you, but willing to eventually kill you if you continue to call them names and/or say stuff about them.
This comes from the aspect of pride where you shouldn't tolerate things people do to you that you don't like. But when there goal is obviously just to make you mad, by getting mad it gives them what they want. The only way your gonna let some words bother you that much is if you have low self esteem
Now last time I checked the only force that words have come from the air pressure that leaves your mouth. How badly you let names bother you is YOUR fault. There is no command someone can say that will make you automatically attack them against your will. People seriously try to justify attacking somebody or vandalizing there property, or even irrelevant violence because they were called names.
When are people gonna realize that it's not what they call you it's what you answer to?
This comes from the aspect of pride where you shouldn't tolerate things people do to you that you don't like. But when there goal is obviously just to make you mad, by getting mad it gives them what they want. The only way your gonna let some words bother you that much is if you have low self esteem
Now last time I checked the only force that words have come from the air pressure that leaves your mouth. How badly you let names bother you is YOUR fault. There is no command someone can say that will make you automatically attack them against your will. People seriously try to justify attacking somebody or vandalizing there property, or even irrelevant violence because they were called names.
When are people gonna realize that it's not what they call you it's what you answer to?
by Optical_Epilepsy July 20, 2010
Get the name calling mug.