Possibly the stupidest idea ever conceived, and it's never used right. Ever.
Hate groups are basically some people that dislike something, so they band together into a hate group.
The biggest problems with hate groups are:
1. Once you hate something enough to band together with a bunch of strangers, there really is no talking you out of it. So 90% of the hate groups' members are intolerant dickheads that will shelve anything you say if it's not exactly their opinion.
2. Hate groups often target one small portion on something. So if one guy calls you a fat-fuck inbred and acts like a dumbshit, everyone relating to that person must obviously be that way. Thus, everything positive is heresy.
3. Hate groups never really give up (Rick Astley). Combined with the first problem, they will most-likely do anything to convert you to their side. You like a T.V. show I don't? You obviously want to fuck the characters and you instantly gain a few hundred pounds, a neckbeard and have autism. Why? Because I said so.
Hate groups are basically some people that dislike something, so they band together into a hate group.
The biggest problems with hate groups are:
1. Once you hate something enough to band together with a bunch of strangers, there really is no talking you out of it. So 90% of the hate groups' members are intolerant dickheads that will shelve anything you say if it's not exactly their opinion.
2. Hate groups often target one small portion on something. So if one guy calls you a fat-fuck inbred and acts like a dumbshit, everyone relating to that person must obviously be that way. Thus, everything positive is heresy.
3. Hate groups never really give up (Rick Astley). Combined with the first problem, they will most-likely do anything to convert you to their side. You like a T.V. show I don't? You obviously want to fuck the characters and you instantly gain a few hundred pounds, a neckbeard and have autism. Why? Because I said so.
Think of all the shitty hate groups out there, like the Westboro Baptist Church. Do you like the WBC? Fuck no. Why? Cause they force shit down everyone's throats. And if you try to talk them out of it, they mentally plug their ears going ALALALALALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU!!!!!!! and then tell you to fuck off because having a different opinion is evil. Now, think of all the good hate groups... Which ones? Exactly. There are no 'good' hate groups. Because hatred starts out small, then builds up until you wanna fucking choke somebody, then you go full retard and fuck something completely over until you're banned, arrested or even murdered.
Life would be better not with hate groups, but will reasoning. But I'm sorry, we live in the "FUK U U FUCING FAGET #YOLO#SWAG DUBSTEP!!!!! LE FUNEH STUFF LELELELELELEELLELLLELLELE XDXDXDXDXDXDDXDDDDDXDXDXDXDXXDXD" generation. It would actually be easier to play Poker with a wall than talk some sense into these plebians.
Life would be better not with hate groups, but will reasoning. But I'm sorry, we live in the "FUK U U FUCING FAGET #YOLO#SWAG DUBSTEP!!!!! LE FUNEH STUFF LELELELELELEELLELLLELLELE XDXDXDXDXDXDDXDDDDDXDXDXDXDXXDXD" generation. It would actually be easier to play Poker with a wall than talk some sense into these plebians.
by Mister Cookie January 08, 2013
Get the Hate Group mug.by Mister Cookie October 28, 2012
Get the Oprah mug.An inside joke is something that a select group of people, and only those select few people, will ever understand until it is explained to anyone outside of that group.
Something Urban Dictionary really seems to hate. Seriously, I can understand removing definitions with people's full names in them, because that can be used to track people. But inside jokes? Really? They aren't all THAT bad, at least compared to all the racist, sexist, offensive shit on this site. But scroll down to the "Remove" button. Full names and inside jokes are THE ONLY 2 reasons to remove definitions, nothing else. What the fuck.
Something Urban Dictionary really seems to hate. Seriously, I can understand removing definitions with people's full names in them, because that can be used to track people. But inside jokes? Really? They aren't all THAT bad, at least compared to all the racist, sexist, offensive shit on this site. But scroll down to the "Remove" button. Full names and inside jokes are THE ONLY 2 reasons to remove definitions, nothing else. What the fuck.
Group: And then... HE WAS THE 4TH MONOPOLY!!! AHHAHHAAHAAHHAAH!!!
Guy: What?
*Joke is explained*
Guy: I still don't see why it's THIS funny...
Group: Are you kidding!? Hahahhahaha!!!
...
...
Everyone: Why does this site hate inside jokes to the point of deleting them and nothing that is actually worth the time of deleting?
Guy: What?
*Joke is explained*
Guy: I still don't see why it's THIS funny...
Group: Are you kidding!? Hahahhahaha!!!
...
...
Everyone: Why does this site hate inside jokes to the point of deleting them and nothing that is actually worth the time of deleting?
by Mister Cookie October 27, 2012
Get the Inside Joke mug."Internet Gaming Network". A vast site built for "reviewing" video games that is actually used as an Xbox worship shrine.
Anything that isn't on Xbox gets rated lower.
Anything on Xbox that is an FPS that isn't Call of Duty or Halo gets rated lower.
Anything relatively fun gets rated lower.
But if it's Call of Duty on Xbox, it gets rated near perfect scores. And IGN vowed to "never give out perfect scores. No game is perfect." Fucking assholes.
Most of the "reviews" are bias as Hell, and the games always get rated depending on what console it's on and how much the company that owns the game they're "reviewing" bribes them.
A perfect example for IGN's shitty-ness are their "reviews" for the new Madden NFL games. All of them are rated high-as-fuck even though Madden games are the same bullshit every year, just with different character designs.
IGN has never, and will never, write a good review that isn't about a game made by their gods EA, Activision, and Microsoft.
Did I mention they were also owned by a news broadcast? Something like FOX News? That would make a lot a sense.
Anything that isn't on Xbox gets rated lower.
Anything on Xbox that is an FPS that isn't Call of Duty or Halo gets rated lower.
Anything relatively fun gets rated lower.
But if it's Call of Duty on Xbox, it gets rated near perfect scores. And IGN vowed to "never give out perfect scores. No game is perfect." Fucking assholes.
Most of the "reviews" are bias as Hell, and the games always get rated depending on what console it's on and how much the company that owns the game they're "reviewing" bribes them.
A perfect example for IGN's shitty-ness are their "reviews" for the new Madden NFL games. All of them are rated high-as-fuck even though Madden games are the same bullshit every year, just with different character designs.
IGN has never, and will never, write a good review that isn't about a game made by their gods EA, Activision, and Microsoft.
Did I mention they were also owned by a news broadcast? Something like FOX News? That would make a lot a sense.
by Mister Cookie November 06, 2012
Get the IGN mug.Guy 1: Your a total idiot!
Guy 2: It's "You're", dumbfuck.
Guy 1: no it's not! It's clearly spelled "your"! idiot!
Guy 2: Your irony is delicious!
Guy 2: It's "You're", dumbfuck.
Guy 1: no it's not! It's clearly spelled "your"! idiot!
Guy 2: Your irony is delicious!
by Mister Cookie September 20, 2012
Get the You're mug.