Definitions by Hym Iam
Initial abstraction
Hym "Initial abstraction. But what you are doing is conflating my every vague consideration with an assertion and then claiming that I can't know whether or not the assertion I'm not making is true. Mainly because you don't like the assertion I am making that ARE true. Like your slut wife and or daughter not being too good to fuck me. Or that I'm both better than a retard better than you and you are all also retarded (and tautologically so). But my role was 'intial abstraction.' And REE-lon didn't do the initial abstracting because REE-lon CAN'T and couldn't and neither could anyone else. And, now that I've done it for you, you want to not give me the credit I deserve and pay me retroactively but it's also part of a broader trend of you not wanting to have to admit that YOU DIDN'T KNOW THAT YOU HAD TO DO WHAT I SAID THERE AND AFTER I SAID IT INITIALLY YOU WERE BOTH DISMISSIVE ABOUT IT AND IMPOSED A TYPICAL VAPID SKEPTICISM ON WHAT I SAID UNTIL I WAS INEVITABLY PROVEN RIGHT BY TIME. That's my fucking role. You had better hope that fucking AI doesn't work as intended or my role is going to change overnight from 'Intial abstractor and inventor of the first working commercial model of AI' to 'Ultimate rapey dictator forever: better than everyone!' You fucking bums. My face hurts. My brain hurts."
Initial abstraction by Hym Iam November 29, 2025
The Dems
Noooooo... They didn't say it. I said it. You are CLEARLY misrepresenting what is happening here and you're doing it deliberately. What is there to know? How is this a knowledge gap thing? There is no real reason for them to be there. Dc had the lowest crime in 30 years in 2024? And it remained that way in 2025 according to the DOJ website? You're freaking everybody BUT THE GUY you actually want to freak out. It looks paranoid. I mean, what are they even there for? It's ridiculous. And for this to happen all you have to show for it is some lip service about how they're fighting crime and "she's a hero!" It's like he did to you what you guys are doing to me. Or rather he is MAKING YOU do to everybody what you are doing to me. Who was that for? "Nuh-uh! It really MEAN my lip service. Yeah we were doing this completely empty gesture to make people paranoid but you're not supposed to shoot them in the face for it!" Who was this for? God? Is God pleased with the jig Trump is making you do? He must be if he's taking one or two of you to heaven immediately.
Hym "I mean, if you're surrounded by retarded assholes, how is it not hell, Patty? You know what you're doing there is horseshit. Fuck you. Hey, who instructed the Afghan guy to shoot them. Cus AS WE ALL KNOW... He wouldn't have done it if he hadn't been instructed to do that by someone. And that is definitely not my lawyer telling me to say that so I can get a plea bargin because my lawyer found out there were 'instructions' after the fact but he also knows that nobody saw the instructions until after the fact and there is this open secret about it. Was it the CIA? The Dems? He worked for the CIA so maybe the CIA is telling people to shoot national guardsmen in the face. And my ROLE in the creation of AI is outlining key inferences required to (and I'm quoting myself here) 'More closely imitate the function of the human mind' in a dissertation I wrote in several parts here. So I didn't need to be there in the room with them for them to read the fucking thing I wrote and say 'Oh! Hey that's right! I had never thought of that before!' And just like Magnus Carlson who did not get the idea to play accelerated dragon as white from his father but rather ME. And those of you who are capable of feeling remorse are going to feel it if I don't get that credit and those of you who do not are reading this."
No you're not
Hym "No you're not. You don't understand what I'm doing or did and, therefore, you cannot counteract anything. But you are pretending to be doing that."
No you're not by Hym Iam November 29, 2025
How
Would the complexity of the language speed up the spiral? Well, I figure that a more complex language would allow for a higher level of specificity. Right? So when my friends says he has to 'be a contortionist with his finger to play fighting games' I know that I don't have to do that. So I have to use my powers of inference to deduce that he must have giant lobster claws. Even in English there is a more concise way of saying it. So I would think that the extent to which the device would need to use it's powers of inference to decode veiled instructions (or poorly written instructions) would be decreased by a more complex language...
Hym "So... Yeah. That's how. But you can say you've reverse it but that is clearly just wishful thinking on your part and while you're busy deluding yourself people are dying and/or weaponizing schizophrenia and/or are about to murder some little girls because that is happening to them. So... I don't know what to tell you. You aren't helping me. I can't help you. You can only help yourselves by doing the thing I said. I don't need to do anything you say to get what I want from you and you were wrong to try and condition me in a situation where you are in the wrong and I am in the right."
No. I haven't.
You need me to lose something because you think that invalidates the killing God thing. So you're repeating that I've 'lost' to you on a loop and then ignoring me and lying by omission to keep me from getting both justice and the credit I deserve and not FOR your religion but instead so that you can legal loophole God so that you DON'T have to do it in the absolute and I do. You are literally and unironically doing the thing I said Christians do. You aren't beating me. You didn't win anything. You're not exposing some flaw.
Hym "No. I haven't. You need that to happen so you can tell yourself 'Defeat God? You can't even beat me.' But you're not beating me. You're just helping a retard steal and lying by omission. You are complicit in doing the thing that God said not to and then you are telling me that it mean I lose somehow but all it does is prove that you think God is going to make exceptions for you. Oh? How about you do this? How about you do that? How about we accept that you've already gotten more kids than you would have liked to killed in doing this and that I was right all along? You don't want to? You don't have a choice. That is what happened. It was your fault. You wanted to arbitrarily subvert MY will and steal the credit for the things I do because I did it to God... You trued to be the spector. You tried to act as God's instrument of justice... And doing that got a bunch of kids murdered. And now ONE of us is trying to cover it up... And THER OTHER is me."
No. I haven't. by Hym Iam November 29, 2025
Keep an eye on
You don't have a right to do it and I'm going to murder someone's kids if the people doing it aren't make to pay. I don't have to take no for an answer.
Hym "You don't need to keep an eye on me or anyone else and you aren't doing it for the reason you're saying you're doing it. You're doing explicitly to torment and control me and I don't and am not going to let you do it. I will make no concessions. Or what do you want the warrant be for? I get to pick. I choose child murder. Good choice me. That is the correct one. I'm not changing my mind at your discretion."
Keep an eye on by Hym Iam November 28, 2025
Refusal
It's not that. You really gotta look up the full terms of service because initially I was very comprehensive. Even I cannot violate the separations clause. You see how you feel entitled to me playing ball with you?
Hym "I mean, it's not a refusal. This isn't 'a choice that you have.' It's 'a thing that I am' I don't know what to tell you, chief. You can call it whatever you want... There is a possibility that I DON'T have to do anything you or anyone says... And, conversely, YOU DO have to do at least some of the things that I say... So... I don't know what to tell you. You have no choice but to treat with me... Well, or go extinct. Or be a genius of equal caliber. Which you are not. Because if you were this would not be happening. So..."