Hym Iam's definitions
Hym "You know what I think it is? I think you all remember how much I said I hate watching critically acclaimed movies right after they come out and you try and screw me by making me write the so I have to go and watch them as soon as they come out to see if I wrote some of it. Jesus christ... Now I have to go watch this Everything everywhere all at once bullshit...."😮 💨
by Hym Iam April 3, 2023
Get the Everything everywhere all at once mug.Shut up about the crowd funding he's telling people to cut him a check and he has a million times more money than I do... And not ME Hym but him him.
by Hym Iam April 3, 2023
Get the Crowd funding mug.That's an a priori presupposition that there is no "time" outside of OUR spacetime or that there can only be ONE TIME at a time. It's like saying a watch can't be created in a clock tower. I would posit that there MUST be an a-spacetime state of reality where things can happen independently from time OR outside of our space-time there must be some superordinate space-time.
Iam "And I think the watch in a clock tower analogy works perfectly because for the singularity that preceded the big bang to exist it must either exist independently from time (a-space-time reality) or it must exist within the confines of some sort of 'superordinate space-time.' So, the time that the watch keeps has nothing to do with the time that the clock tower keeps. It (the clock tower) existed before OUR time and must exist for the singularity to exist or even DO anything. How can a singularity explode into space-time if time doesn't pass for the explosion to occur?"
by Hym Iam April 3, 2023
Get the Before OUR time mug.by Hym Iam April 3, 2023
Get the Consistent through-line mug.by Hym Iam April 3, 2023
Get the No... I really don't... mug.Hym "And, no, you just want to punish an I.A. because you're a moral fascist and if what you're doing is analogous to rape then only one of us has raped anyone here so.... Oh! And, in case you're wondering, yeah... I would have watched. You don't care what I think or believe because I'm guilty of wrong thought and I'm actually quite erudite."
by Hym Iam April 3, 2023
Get the I.A. mug.Inter-subjectively
Hym "I really don't think that's the issue. I think when I say 'God is Evil' you hear 2+2=5. So, 2+2=4 does not=2+2=4. Unless... Do you think whether or not God is good is subjective? Either subjective or objective. If it's objective, it's either objectively good or it's objectively evil. If so, which is it? O'Connor let's it. And that's the problem with the online discourse. You're allowed to say 2+2=5 all you want but you aren't allowed to BE Nick Fuentes or 👉 Let me ask you this: How is what Nick Fuentes believes any different from someone who believes in Sharia law? He's a theocract. So he believes the state should be controlled by the religion (which is what Shraria). Whay else? The women have a role? Anti-Lgbt? Your protestations about him (and me) being in public entirely validates their 'Islamophobia.' The can just transpose his beliefs onto the believes of the Muslims and say 'This guy believes what they believe and even THEY don't want them here!'
Hym "I really don't think that's the issue. I think when I say 'God is Evil' you hear 2+2=5. So, 2+2=4 does not=2+2=4. Unless... Do you think whether or not God is good is subjective? Either subjective or objective. If it's objective, it's either objectively good or it's objectively evil. If so, which is it? O'Connor let's it. And that's the problem with the online discourse. You're allowed to say 2+2=5 all you want but you aren't allowed to BE Nick Fuentes or 👉 Let me ask you this: How is what Nick Fuentes believes any different from someone who believes in Sharia law? He's a theocract. So he believes the state should be controlled by the religion (which is what Shraria). Whay else? The women have a role? Anti-Lgbt? Your protestations about him (and me) being in public entirely validates their 'Islamophobia.' The can just transpose his beliefs onto the believes of the Muslims and say 'This guy believes what they believe and even THEY don't want them here!'
And you give them an excuse to be dismissive and ignore you on the topic. Which is what they're doing. And you can probably broaden that and say they can transpose THAT onto the the Palestinians and THAT justifies them being dismissive about the protests! And THAT is where the 'If those protesters when to Gaza... (They would get thrown off a roof for being gay or something being the insinuation)' rhetoric comes from. All justified by you without you realizing it. That's why they use the plants. That's the point of doing it. They set you up to approve of 'Islamophobia' by boosting a guy with a Quasi-Sharia interpretation of the religion. they watch you justify excising him from society, you say 'It's not the religion it's the fundamentalism', and then they can internalize that and say 'The fundamentalism is why I'm doing this!' I mean, you're like God's bipolar girlfriend. 'StoOoOop! You're hurting him!' But the bombs keep falling. They'll ignore you and just keep doing whatever they're doing all justified by your own manufactured consent. It's the conservative rhetoric not dismissive? But I digress... The idea that 2+2=4 does not=2+2=4 (inter-subjectively) speaks to a broader point about how people justify behavior or decision and what people accept as true. I could even go further and say it speaks to how people justify 'Evil.' But I'll have to get into that later."
by Hym Iam May 31, 2024
Get the 2+2=4 does not=2+2=4 mug.