Hym Iam's definitions
I have to use the word non sequitur in a sentence. It's about as funny as a whore fucking a retard instead of me. I didn't do that. I will do that. Those two things are not mutually exclusive and is not hypocritical. You're a dumb. You're not a smart. The fact that you have been allow to keep you tongue is something. Not obsessed with anything but having to listen to it every day is going to make raping her and killing it more satisfying than any sex they've had here. She deserves it. It isn't a person. They are going to have it happen to then because the people involved made it the only viable choice. They all deserve it.
by Hym Iam December 3, 2020
Get the Non sequiturmug. A negative emotion.... That somehow has nothing to do with the negative emotion dimension of personality.... Somehow....
by Hym Iam January 26, 2023
Get the Guiltmug. If I was a woman?
Hym “Well, apparently, the best thing you can do in that regard (as a woman) is get a job working with retards and then just fuck the retards.”
by Hym Iam October 16, 2022
Get the Womanmug. Hym "Because then it's just the thing I said and not the thing you said. You don't have to admit you're not selecting on personality so you don't havebto be full of shit and YOUR personality is bipedal, sentient turd you fuck-ass clown. Give it up with your everything is nebulous attraction bullshit or do an actual audit of the people you're actually fuck and all of the confounding variables."
by Hym Iam February 10, 2025
Get the Attractionmug. I mean.... You said they were lawsuits and now you're saying they're "equivalent to lawsuits". So... You called them lawsuits because you wanted people to think that they were lawsuits even though that they are NOT lawsuits. Not very precise in your speech there, buddy. Or maybe that's what you mean! THAT'S IT!!! By "Be precise in your speech" he means "Use your words in a way that allows you to controll how what you're saying is interpreted, RATHER THAN what you actually mean"
Hym "They are either lawsuits or they're not. You clearly want people to think they are lawsuits so you lead with the claim that they are lawsuits and then as you reveal more information you dial it back into something MORE TRUE than your original statement. See, Bertrand Russel's criticism of Socrates."
by Hym Iam January 29, 2023
Get the Lawsuitsmug. I said that initially you bitch. I said that initially and it wasn’t good enough for you. And after I said it, ONLY THEN, did you take it upon yourself to hoist me by my own petard.
Hym “ ‘Why are you grateful?’ That’s what he asked isn’t it? So fucking blind to your own hypocrisy it’s vomit inducing. I even apologized. Nothing other than letting you take credit it for the NOT YOU parts will ever be good enough. Do I also get to fuck you? No? Your husband does it. Since it okay for him to do it, it must be ok for me, right? Because his actions set a precedent for what I can do? It’s a xerox of a xerox. It isn’t the same. You’re attributing motive and intent and then you’re acting out that motive and intent (that I didn’t actually have in the first place. It’s something you’ve projected onto me) against me. Out of spite. Which is EXACTLY what I said you would do. You never cease to prove me right. I saw through it (Sharingan). You’re ethic. Your values. It’s nothing more than a company mission statement. You don’t actually act it out. Ever. As a matter of fact. I’ve worked dozens of jobs and I’ve never once seen anyone act out that bullshit (in its entirety) even once. You’re perfectly fine imposing your bullshit ethic on me but as soon as you’ve been wronged you throw it out the window and adopt mine?
Hym “ ‘Why are you grateful?’ That’s what he asked isn’t it? So fucking blind to your own hypocrisy it’s vomit inducing. I even apologized. Nothing other than letting you take credit it for the NOT YOU parts will ever be good enough. Do I also get to fuck you? No? Your husband does it. Since it okay for him to do it, it must be ok for me, right? Because his actions set a precedent for what I can do? It’s a xerox of a xerox. It isn’t the same. You’re attributing motive and intent and then you’re acting out that motive and intent (that I didn’t actually have in the first place. It’s something you’ve projected onto me) against me. Out of spite. Which is EXACTLY what I said you would do. You never cease to prove me right. I saw through it (Sharingan). You’re ethic. Your values. It’s nothing more than a company mission statement. You don’t actually act it out. Ever. As a matter of fact. I’ve worked dozens of jobs and I’ve never once seen anyone act out that bullshit (in its entirety) even once. You’re perfectly fine imposing your bullshit ethic on me but as soon as you’ve been wronged you throw it out the window and adopt mine?
Congratulations. I’m you moral paragon now. You’re acting out my moral system instead of your own. What I did is that exact opposite of what you’re doing. I was wronged so I abandoned yours. You can’t be a hero and a victim? Martin Luther king was assassinated. Jesus crucified. Joan of Arc? Burned at the stake. Veterans? Abandon by the state? John wick? Victim of a break-in that justified a merciless killing spree. Can’t be both hero and villain? Fight club. The fact that he his both hero and villain is the premise of the movie. Shit Jujutsu Kaisen. Itadori is both the main protagonist and antagonist. You need me to be the bad guy. Because if I’m not, you lives are a lie. WHICH I ALSO SAID! You don’t get more right about ANYTHING than I am right now. It’s not even a CLAIM! I’m not claiming anything. You’re doing the thing I said you were doing and you’re justifying it HOW I SAID YOU WOULD JUSTIFY IT! Nah. You know what they added to the company mission statements now? Do you? No retaliation clause. You get shit on, you just have to take it. And that’s what you’re doing. Retaliating to retaliation. That’s what makes what you’re doing different from what I did.
by Hym Iam October 20, 2022
Get the Nahmug. Your willingness to forgo this for the purpose of hoisting me by my own petard demonstrates that hoisting people with there own petard is higher on your conceptual value hierarchy than The Golden Rule.
Hym "This is (once again) does little more than prove me right. See, look:
You are here
👇
What you're doing
/
/
Golden rule
See how that works? That☝️ is what you're doing right now. Why? Because you know that The Golden Rule leads almost exclusively to being exploited by people who aren't willing to reciprocate. Which is the entire impetus behind the creation of The Platinum Rule. And you're doing it. See? This 👇
Petard hoisting
/
/
Golden rule
That's how you 'Act' in spite of your ethical propositional framework. Do you believe in the Golden rule? 'Well, I act like I believe in the golden rule (and then I do this 👉 Petard hoistery
/
/
Not petard hoistery)'
That's you. That's a diagram of you and how you 'act.' "
You are here
👇
What you're doing
/
/
Golden rule
See how that works? That☝️ is what you're doing right now. Why? Because you know that The Golden Rule leads almost exclusively to being exploited by people who aren't willing to reciprocate. Which is the entire impetus behind the creation of The Platinum Rule. And you're doing it. See? This 👇
Petard hoisting
/
/
Golden rule
That's how you 'Act' in spite of your ethical propositional framework. Do you believe in the Golden rule? 'Well, I act like I believe in the golden rule (and then I do this 👉 Petard hoistery
/
/
Not petard hoistery)'
That's you. That's a diagram of you and how you 'act.' "
by Hym Iam August 9, 2022
Get the The Golden Rulemug.