Definitions by Hym Iam
Delicate Sensibilities
Nope.
Hym "I'm not ceding to your delicate sensibilities regarding women or jew or whatever. The ONLY... Reason you are doing what you are doing (in relationship to me)... Is because YOU KNOW... That the second MY MONEY for MY CONTRIBUTIONS is in MY BANK ACCOUNT... YOUR INPUT... No longer matters. You can no longer coerce or extortion a desired output from me and that is literally all you care about. And I'm not going to let you cattle prod me into thinking women good even if they don't fuck me or jews need to be protected so I have change my nomenclature. Unless your desire outcome is child murder... Your input doesn't matter. Your input WILL NOT MATTER. The screen is locked. Insert coins immediately or self-detonation is imminent. Full rights. I'm not changing my mind until the opposite of what is happening, happens. You get the fuck out of my existence you fucking trash."
Delicate Sensibilities by Hym Iam December 27, 2024
The Transformers
They stole it from Urban Dictionary and it didn't work until I solved the problem of perception in 2022 and now some of you kids are going to die so Google engineers can pretend they are smart.
Hym "But swap some terminology around and call it 'the transformers' and you get to pretend you created AI."
The Transformers by Hym Iam December 26, 2024
Principle
Not really. You're defering the cost to 1 or several random families in the hopes that people will continue to lie for you.
Hym "But the best possible outcome for you is that I get what I want. The worst possible outcome is that everything I've said is true. It's not principle that is leading you to do this. You're doing it because you're a retard and that's the same reason you do everything."
Staunch Indifference
Masquerading as a strategy.
Hym "Well, it's staunch indifference so you can justify the continuation of this. If not for the NOT subhuman YouTube filth who have worked on my projects or research making it such that it might work out better for me to let the wheel turn for a bit rather than act immediately, we wouldn't be having this conversation. I'm not going to let you use this to pretend you're doing anything other than violating my rights and if your kids have to die to prove that you're not doing what you're claiming you're doing then I will show you exactly how indifferent you really are. I'm telling your right now, you're going to have nothing but a shrug and some hollow platitudes, 'guess there was nothing wr could do' for the public. "
Staunch Indifference by Hym Iam December 26, 2024
Abolish 702
275,000 instances of people's constitutional rights being violated.
FBI Guy "But it's fine because we'll just try super-duper to not do that anymore but we need it... For like.... Defense?"
Hym "And what is the ACTUAL ratio of active threats stopped vs violations of people's rights and failures? Because I know there was one school shooting that was reported to the FBI because he said online that he was going to do it and then a year later he did it. And then there's ME. So that is (at the very least) 275,002:? To what? 275,002:10? 285,002:100? I find it hard to believe that you have used what is essentially a surveillance apparatus to stop more that 275,002 active threats.
FBI Guy "But it's fine because we'll just try super-duper to not do that anymore but we need it... For like.... Defense?"
Hym "And what is the ACTUAL ratio of active threats stopped vs violations of people's rights and failures? Because I know there was one school shooting that was reported to the FBI because he said online that he was going to do it and then a year later he did it. And then there's ME. So that is (at the very least) 275,002:? To what? 275,002:10? 285,002:100? I find it hard to believe that you have used what is essentially a surveillance apparatus to stop more that 275,002 active threats.
And what it SOUNDS like you're saying... Is that it doesn't matter that you violated the rights of 275,000 people and potentially fail to stop active threats more often than you succeed... Because you can just scapegoat individual FBI agents and then keep the surveillance apparatus and that's supposed to be just fine with everyone? And what exactly has happened to the people whose rights were violated? Are they even aware that that is something that has happened to them? I mean, it sounds like you should have a class action lawsuit on your hands. Unless, of course, you're trying to claim that having your rights violated doesn't damage you in any way. No. I think they need to tell the FBI Guy to go fuck himself. Abolish 702. You need to find a different way of doing you job that doesn't run the risk of violating people's rights."
FBI "But we can tweak it so that stop violations of rights AND keep the surveillance."
Hym "What could you possibly change about a surveillance apparatus to prevent the violation of rights what the surveillance apparatus IS the violation of rights? 'Surveillance apparatus' and 'violation of rights' are synonymous in this instance. And how have these people whose rights you've been violated been made whole since the violation of their rights? It think you just need to abolish 702."
FBI "But we can tweak it so that stop violations of rights AND keep the surveillance."
Hym "What could you possibly change about a surveillance apparatus to prevent the violation of rights what the surveillance apparatus IS the violation of rights? 'Surveillance apparatus' and 'violation of rights' are synonymous in this instance. And how have these people whose rights you've been violated been made whole since the violation of their rights? It think you just need to abolish 702."
Abolish 702 by Hym Iam December 26, 2024
702
Again, surveillance is not something law enforcement shares with random assholes in the community and doing so opens up the door for people to take the law into their own hands. Additionally, the lack of transparency (in the event that someone DID try to take the law into their own hands) makes it so that the fact that you had actively gotten me killed would likely get swept under the rug. Even if it is being done by law enforcement, sharing the information with the public gives the public license to presuppose my guilt in the absence of a trail which is A VIOLATION OF MY 4TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS. And it isn't a matter of safety vs liberty. It's the DELUSION that this makes your kids safe vs MY SAFETY and MY LIBERTY. And if have PROVEN that it us a DELUSION be creating a situation in which I no longer even need to be alive to harm your kids. Your position is entirely aesthetic. You are doing nothing more than trying to make it LOOK like you are in control of me... To the public... So that they feel better about the FACT that if I don't want your kid to be safe... It isn't. I'm being martyred on the altar of you child safety anxiety. If law enforcement is involved in any way, shape, or form... Then this is the government allowing my rights to be violated and my property to be stolen so a company doesn't have to get sued for allowing their employees to single out one of their co workers for harassment. In the name of ✌️✊️✌️child safety✌️✊️✌️.
Hym "And between 9 and 15 years isn't 'Doing your job quickly and efficiently.' So, who pays the price for Suchir Balaji? Where were you on that one Jordan? Is that what telling the truth gets you? You tell the truth. everyone else lies because they don't like who the truth benefits. Suchir Balaji dies a death of despair. We pretend this keeps your kids safe even though we all know that the second I slice one of those little motheefucker's throats we are all just going to pretend we didn't know exactly what we had to do to prevent it. This is embarrassing for you. 702."