You're missing the point. If you liking me doesn't translate to or manifest in the form of anything tangible, whether or not you like me is irrelevant. It's not conflation, you've rendered yourself moot. And it's not that what you're saying is untrue BUT it seems to be the cases that anything other than affirming their love of big fat cocks is unacceptable. I'm not doing anything that anybody else isn't doing. And I maintain that my position is and has alway been: I have a right to know what's going on around me. Even if that means the people around me lose a degree of social leverage. It isn't not my responsibility to accept an
imposed form of ignorance that is used explicitly to keep me from using my own capacity for choice and keep my behavior convenient. It's only "not real" because if it IS REAL then the random circumabulation of my mind is worth more than your entire life's work. In the same way that some atheist don't want to believe that God is real because if it IS REAL it means that your soul is going to burn forever.
imposed form of ignorance that is used explicitly to keep me from using my own capacity for choice and keep my behavior convenient. It's only "not real" because if it IS REAL then the random circumabulation of my mind is worth more than your entire life's work. In the same way that some atheist don't want to believe that God is real because if it IS REAL it means that your soul is going to burn forever.
Hym "The problem with the assertion that an outcome is the result of *Insert amorphous abstraction here* is that the logical conclusion always leads to an existential superiority claim. Do you *Insert amorphous abstraction here* as hard as an Alaskan crab fisherman? No? So then were does the disproportionate success come from? *insert existential superiority claim* Well, you could say, 'The job has a different "type" of difficulty' BUT are you accounting for mitigating variables in your self assessment? Does association mitigate the 'difficulty' of garnering disproportionate success? Then, why are people so willing to associate with you as opposed to other? *Insert existential superiority claim* So, what is the point of using these amorphous abstractions? It's a convenient out when you're engaged in verbal conflict. You can always drag the conflict down into the realm of semantics at a moments notice. Imagine, we're in conflict over our disparate outcomes. You posit *Insert amorphous abstraction here* as justification for the disparity. I am then forced to either accept your definition of what constitutes *Insert amorphous abstraction here* (Which I have no reason to do because we're in conflict) OR I have convince you that your definition of *Insert amorphous abstraction here* is flawed or incongruous with objective reality (Which I will never be able to do because you would never render your own outcome unjustified). It's just a word-trick."
by Hym Iam February 26, 2023
Get the *Insert amorphous abstraction here*mug. Hym "I mean, you're not even willing to pay a guy for his labor to protect kids from getting murdered. You sure as hell don't give a fuck about kids 'seeing gyrating' and are likely to do just as little."
by Hym Iam July 01, 2024
Get the Gyratingmug. Son of a bitch! It’s spelled with a “G”? Mother.... Goddamnit Todd! You know, I spelled it right last time. Damnit!
Hym “Well shit... but I have spelled gerrymandering correctly in the past! Ok!? And I’m pretty sure there is a guitar playing term called jerrymandering. Anywho, you notice that the guy president of Hungary looks like a bloated version of that guy from NCIS? You see it? Look at his face! It’s fat NCIS guy! Hilarious!”
by Hym Iam November 09, 2022
Get the Gerrymanderingmug. That's your problem. You're obsessed with your own emotional state. It is the metric by which you measure your own delusional morality.
by Hym Iam June 18, 2025
Get the Afraidmug. Hym “Yes, more yes-men and tomato-cans. That’ll be fun to watch. Hey what happened to the beetejuice rule? Where if I say something insulting 3 times you have to confront me? Mikhaila Peterson is a slut. Mikhaila Peterson is a slut. Mikhaila Peterson is a slut. There you go. And day now. Try and hurry up yeah, we’ll test your theory that I can’t do this in person.”
by Hym Iam November 07, 2022
Get the Yes-men and Tomato-cansmug. Alright. Time to get to work.
Hym "No. Your identity does not need to be 'nested in a relationship.' See what I mean about 'The Chosen'? And not Joe Rogan's retarded shit trying to repurpose my shit. They legitimately believe that if a woman hasn't signed off on you, if you haven't been ordained, you don't have an identity. This is what you get when men use woman to validate their existence. Like... No. Identity has nothing to do with being in a relationship. Woman aren't selecting for functionality. Golden state killer had a wife and kids. Wayne gacy had a wife and kids. Ted bundy great with women had intimate relationships (and to the chick that wrote the song in response to this: No if you met Ted bundy you'd be a blue, jizz filled corpse). It also isn't pretend world where you can be tri-gender fox spirit but that's neither here nor there. Your identity is a configuration of traits and deeds, is both internal and external, and what people like to do now-a-days is falsify their identity with the help of others.
Hym "No. Your identity does not need to be 'nested in a relationship.' See what I mean about 'The Chosen'? And not Joe Rogan's retarded shit trying to repurpose my shit. They legitimately believe that if a woman hasn't signed off on you, if you haven't been ordained, you don't have an identity. This is what you get when men use woman to validate their existence. Like... No. Identity has nothing to do with being in a relationship. Woman aren't selecting for functionality. Golden state killer had a wife and kids. Wayne gacy had a wife and kids. Ted bundy great with women had intimate relationships (and to the chick that wrote the song in response to this: No if you met Ted bundy you'd be a blue, jizz filled corpse). It also isn't pretend world where you can be tri-gender fox spirit but that's neither here nor there. Your identity is a configuration of traits and deeds, is both internal and external, and what people like to do now-a-days is falsify their identity with the help of others.
Jordan Peterson isn't 'not a charlatan' because he isn't a charlatan. He's 'not charlatan' because the people who are willing to hold water for him are willing to pretend for him. They WON'T pretend that you're a woman if you're a biological male. But they WILL pretend that is motherfucker isn't just making shit up. Like, he's been thrown into this position of faux spiritual leader but it's predicated on false premise that he 'was stabding up for disaffected yound men' and that he 'believes in God'. Neither of which are the case. And now as the self-appointed translator of God's book and the arbiter of sin and when sin is irrelevant, he just males shit up. Because his followers can't think and, therefore, will accept his propositions (whole sale) blindly because they are told by a bought and paid-for media system. Seriously, a guy whose identity IS A FALSEHOOD is telling people what constitutes a 'real' identity. It needs to be 'nested' he says. Why? What about it needs to be nested? What happens if it isn't? Well, people can just make shit up about you or deny your existence. It creates the need FOR YOUR IDENTITY TO BE VALIDATED. That's the purpose of his entire point. His position creates the need for peoples identities to be validated in spite of the fact that your identity is independent from other people. Evidence? You ask? How do I know it's independent from other people? You fail alone and you die alone."
by Hym Iam March 22, 2023
Get the Identitymug. Hym "Hurray! Correct again! Did I not say 'Incel second class citizenry?' Is this not the exact thing I said? 🎶Greatest mind who ever lived🎶 Always right🎶 Better than everyone🎶 This is LITERALLY what Jordan Peterson's 'Minimal necessary unity bullshit MEANS. That's LITERALLY WHAT IT MEANS! You'd better get real comfortable with either murdering kids or being enslaved cus... That's literally the plan for them. And if you don't LIKE the plan, well, then you better get ready for some weaponized schizophrenia SHITHEADS! You see what I mean about you all being deeply unserious? See what I mean about all the natalism shit? Seriously! I started 8 years ago and I'm STILL 8 years ahead of everyone! Wait... Do I not understand how time works here? Hmmm... Yeah, no, I shouldn't be this far ahead."
by Hym Iam July 25, 2024
Get the Natalismmug.