Definitions by Hym Iam
That’s the amount of people who have a dick that is 6 inches or bigger! That’s the exact percentage! It’s that fat cocks! What do we do about it!? Definitely not kill them all... that would be bad and wrong... like trying to impose schizophrenia on someone... stealing all their ideas... 🤔 What could we do? Hmmm.... You know my vote is going to glory whole brothels... that would fix the problem....
Hym “HA! 5%! That’s another one! There I go! Being RIGHT again. Game? Not real! Love! Not real! There is only fat cocks and not-fat cocks... or sign this contract and don’t cheat on me or you don’t get to take half of my money and you burn forever.... or shut up and wear the Hijab bitch or eat rocks... I shouldn’t talk like that. Because I’m also talking about the daughter I don’t have who would be put in direct danger by the thing you’re doing to me and won’t stop because I won’t be the one who pays the price for what you’re doing... and the fact that it would be worse to have a son because no one will care about his life and if he doesn’t buy a permanent whore and/or have a fat cock he will live as a slave and die alone... Hmm... What could we possibly do... Curiouser and curiouser....” 🤔
Desert
Ok, so, you cite the phrase “Let my people go so that they may serve me in the wilderness.” And say that it’s often misquoted (and that’s because it was in a musical. I want to say Joseph an the amazing technicolor dreamcoat and the commercial for it used to play on TV at night and “LET MY PEOPLE GOOO!” was one of the parts that they highlighted IN that commercial) but then you frame the misquote as hedonic freedom and that leads to the desert and the full quote as your propositional ethic.
Hym “BUT! In the Bible it’s the exact opposite. They are let go to serve God and GO TO THE DESERT ANYWAY. You use this tactic to draw the EXACT OPPOSITE conclusion of the material you’re citing. Regularly. Just like the lobster thing. The study your citing draws the exact opposite conclusion. But it’s marketable. I’m also marketable. But billionaires and sycophants aren’t lining up to throw money at me. Not because I’m not better but because I didn’t use Elon’s strategy of ‘general visibility.’ Why is ‘general visibility more important than competence (something that isn’t important at all)? THE PARETO PRINCIPLE! That states ‘Famous people tend to receive more credit than one famous people who contributed!’ It’s a SHAM! It’s a lie! Your whole propositional ethic is just your own person self aggrandizement campaign! Which is why you project that on to me! You think I’m doing it because that what YOU’RE doing! Ha! Ridiculous! What a ridiculous guy!”
True
Oh well jeez, if that’s true, then I guess we better get me some of that credit for all that shit that we all know I did. OR! Or, we allow me to be exploited, we allow the rules to be enforced arbitrarily and selectively, and what you say is rendered false in act REGARDLESS of whether or not it’s true in proposition.
Dr. Narcissistic Machiavellian “It’s true that some people have more than others because they are narcissistic and Machiavellian and have exploited people”
Hym “But thought they weren’t successful. A second ago they weren’t successful. Now it’s only sometimes.”
Dr. Dorjan Sonterpe “Being productive and generous will lead to a positive outcome and NOT blatant and public exploitation”
Hym “I gave away a billion dollars, better ratings, and ideas to sell to your fans for the low, low price of 12.99 a month exclusively on JeepJorp Jeeperson+ How has it effected my outcome at all?”
Dr. Narcissistic Machiavellian “It’s true that some people have more than others because they are narcissistic and Machiavellian and have exploited people”
Hym “But thought they weren’t successful. A second ago they weren’t successful. Now it’s only sometimes.”
Dr. Dorjan Sonterpe “Being productive and generous will lead to a positive outcome and NOT blatant and public exploitation”
Hym “I gave away a billion dollars, better ratings, and ideas to sell to your fans for the low, low price of 12.99 a month exclusively on JeepJorp Jeeperson+ How has it effected my outcome at all?”
Jerp Doctor Jorp “Having a problem with people having more that you is nothing but envy.”
Hym “That is a false dichotomy. You’ve framed the situation as though I have to, either, tolerate other people having more than me OR it’s envy. As though they are mutually exclusive. What I take issue with is the manner in which the things other people have were acquired. Which is outside of your false dichotomy. I don’t care how much you have (and another guy I watch just did the same thing with the false dichotomy) but you’re doing a univariant analysis of your own outcome.”
Professor Lysenko “Well, it’s MOSTLY hard work.”
Hym “Ah! AH! Individual subjective identity! Not allowed to do that! You don’t believe that it’s a thing so YOU’RE not allowed to do it (But I do and am allowed to do it).”
Dr. Doctor PhD “You should be more concerned with the Satan that is inside of yourself.”
Hym “I AM THE SATAN INSIDE OF MYSELF! If you had adequately dealt with YOURS we wouldn’t have a problem, would we? I’m not stalking myself! I’m not lying to myself! Am I taking credit for my own ideas? Have I said anything that isn’t true? How about we be concern with that Satan that is the actual problem? The YOU that’s doing a thing to ME. How bout dat!?”
Hym “That is a false dichotomy. You’ve framed the situation as though I have to, either, tolerate other people having more than me OR it’s envy. As though they are mutually exclusive. What I take issue with is the manner in which the things other people have were acquired. Which is outside of your false dichotomy. I don’t care how much you have (and another guy I watch just did the same thing with the false dichotomy) but you’re doing a univariant analysis of your own outcome.”
Professor Lysenko “Well, it’s MOSTLY hard work.”
Hym “Ah! AH! Individual subjective identity! Not allowed to do that! You don’t believe that it’s a thing so YOU’RE not allowed to do it (But I do and am allowed to do it).”
Dr. Doctor PhD “You should be more concerned with the Satan that is inside of yourself.”
Hym “I AM THE SATAN INSIDE OF MYSELF! If you had adequately dealt with YOURS we wouldn’t have a problem, would we? I’m not stalking myself! I’m not lying to myself! Am I taking credit for my own ideas? Have I said anything that isn’t true? How about we be concern with that Satan that is the actual problem? The YOU that’s doing a thing to ME. How bout dat!?”
Usurp
A dope word. Really. It is. You can Usurp all kind of shit. Do you know what it means? Do you know what usurp means? Bet you don’t. Cus ya brains is no good. Read a book.
Um, Leading the witness your honor
Is what you say when someone is leading someone else to a conclusion that they wouldn’t have otherwise drawn without your input. They use this all the time in courtroom dramas and I’ve seen some of those which means I’m technically a layer. No big deal or anything...
Hym “He was clearly NOT going to say ‘wisdom.’ He said ‘FREEDOM’ and was not going to say wisdom until YOU said wisdom. So... Um, leading the witness your honor! That’s the second time in those clips that you did it too! You did it to the other guy too!”
Dr. Moses Aaronson “Wouldn’t you say that the conclusion you’re trying to draw is the conclusion I want you draw and that I already have drawn in the past?”
Professor Junior Senior-Esquire the 3rd “Why YES! I was! I was going to say that! And I was in no way lead to that conclusion by you leading me there! I’m not here to be a sycophantic yes man whose sole purpose is to affirm your subjective interpretation of the Bible!”
Hym “Ha! Ridiculous! I just saved everyone reading this the trouble of watching your Exodus lecture. That’s all it is. You aggregating your cronies to affirm your propositional ethic. ‘God is too perfect for anyone to be around so I, Dr. Jeeple Jorpson, need to act as an intermediary for it’s will! You need the structure I provide because you can’t be trusted to make decisions because you are basically an animal to me! Or worse if you’re Hym!”
Dr. Moses Aaronson “Wouldn’t you say that the conclusion you’re trying to draw is the conclusion I want you draw and that I already have drawn in the past?”
Professor Junior Senior-Esquire the 3rd “Why YES! I was! I was going to say that! And I was in no way lead to that conclusion by you leading me there! I’m not here to be a sycophantic yes man whose sole purpose is to affirm your subjective interpretation of the Bible!”
Hym “Ha! Ridiculous! I just saved everyone reading this the trouble of watching your Exodus lecture. That’s all it is. You aggregating your cronies to affirm your propositional ethic. ‘God is too perfect for anyone to be around so I, Dr. Jeeple Jorpson, need to act as an intermediary for it’s will! You need the structure I provide because you can’t be trusted to make decisions because you are basically an animal to me! Or worse if you’re Hym!”
Um, Leading the witness your honor by Hym Iam November 27, 2022
Putting words in God’s mouth
Hym “If man can’t literally speak with God, how is the Bible/All religious text not putting words in God’s mouth? (Which is something you accused me of doing) I don’t know, give my thing a couple of thousand years... We’ll see what happens...
Putting words in God’s mouth by Hym Iam November 27, 2022
Love-bombing
And that’s why I love you and what you do because you’re the good one and me? I’m also the good one. We’re both the good ones. You’re a master of what you do because it make it look like my ideas are being opposed without me being exposed as a charlatan. It lends to my credibility in spite of the fact that what you’re saying is critical”
Hym “That’s what a Narcissist does. Love-bombing. He’s a narcissist. Just ask Teal Swan (who is NOTa cult leader and is an absolute gem... maybe... possibly not. I don’t really know). Narcissist. And he has a frowny-face about the A.I. thing because the thing I said might actually work because I’M THE THING I SAY I AM. A Genius. Hurray me!”
Love-bombing by Hym Iam November 26, 2022