Definitions by Abzugal
Neuropsychorelativism
The idea that the brain's structure and function are not fixed interpreters of reality, but are shaped by culture, language, and personal experience to such a degree that there is no single, objective "brain reality." Different brains, shaped by different lives, literally perceive and construct different worlds. Your neural architecture is your own unique reality-generating prison.
Consider the concept of "schizophrenia." Neuropsychorelativism might argue that in a culture that interprets auditory hallucinations as communication with ancestors, the brain's wiring and the person's experience would be fundamentally different—and perhaps less distressing—than in a culture that pathologizes it as a disease. The brain isn't discovering reality; it's building a bespoke one based on its inputs. Someone who grows up bilingual might have a literally different neural landscape for language than a monolingual person.
Neuropsychorelativism by Abzugal January 24, 2026
Neuropsychorealism
The belief that our subjective mental experiences—thoughts, emotions, "the self"—are direct, one-to-one products of specific, measurable brain states. It asserts that if we had a perfect brain scanner, we could read your mind like a book because every qualia (like the redness of red or the ache of sadness) has a precise neural barcode. It's the ultimate "you are your brain" stance, dismissing anything that can't be physically located as illusion.
Neuropsychorealism would argue that your feeling of love for your partner isn't some mystical connection, but simply the predictable firing pattern of neurons in your ventral tegmental area and nucleus accumbens, flooded with oxytocin and dopamine. If we could perfectly replicate that exact brain state in a vat, you'd feel identical love for no one at all. The movie "Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind" is a neuropsychorealist nightmare—since memories are physical engrams, zapping them should delete the associated emotion.
Neuropsychorealism by Abzugal January 24, 2026
Great Books Theory
The conviction that the classic texts of Western (and global) literature—from Homer to Dante to Shakespeare—contain timeless wisdom about human nature, morality, and the forces that shape history. Jiang argues that these “Great Books” are not just old stories; they are encoded manuals for understanding the present and navigating the future. Reading them is like downloading the software of civilization itself.
“Great Books Theory says that if you want to predict the next Trump, read Macbeth. If you want to understand modern propaganda, read *1984*. And if you want to know where society is headed, crack open the Iliad—it’s all there, dude.”
Great Books Theory by Abzugal January 24, 2026
Applied Game Theory
Using game‑theory models to explain real‑world politics, economics, and social behavior. Jiang strips away the abstract math and applies concepts like the prisoner’s dilemma, zero‑sum games, and Nash equilibria to everything from dating to nuclear brinkmanship. The idea is that if you can figure out the “payoff matrix” of any situation, you can predict—and even manipulate—the choices of the players. It’s strategy for geeks who want to rule the world.
“Applied Game Theory explains why the U.S. and China are stuck in an arms race: it’s a classic ‘security dilemma’ where neither side can back down without looking weak. Spoiler: the only winning move is to change the game.”
Applied Game Theory by Abzugal January 24, 2026
Civilization Theory
A grand‑narrative approach that traces the life‑cycle of human societies from birth to decay. Jiang’s “Civilization” lectures argue that civilizations are driven not just by economics or technology, but by the unifying power of transcendent beliefs—religions, ideologies, and cultural myths. When those beliefs erode, the society loses its cohesion and eventually collapses. It’s a sweeping, philosophical take on why some cultures last millennia and others flame out in centuries.
“Civilization Theory says the West is in its ‘late‑imperial’ phase: too much bureaucracy, not enough faith, and a looming demographic winter. Time to reread Gibbon and pray for a renaissance.”
Civilization Theory by Abzugal January 24, 2026
Geo‑Strategy Theory
The art of using historical analogies as a playbook for modern statecraft. Jiang’s “Geo‑Strategy” series treats today’s great‑power contests as reruns of past conflicts—comparing U.S.‑China tensions to Athens vs. Sparta, or Iran’s regional maneuvering to the Persian Empire’s old games. The theory holds that leaders who understand these templates can avoid classic traps and outmaneuver their rivals. It’s like Sun Tzu meets a history‑channel binge.
“Geo‑Strategy Theory warned that the U.S. getting bogged down in the Middle East was a repeat of the ‘Roman overstretch’ mistake. Next time, maybe we’ll listen to the professor instead of the generals.”
Geo‑Strategy Theory by Abzugal January 24, 2026
Pax Judaica Theory
The idea that a new world order led by Jewish intellectual, financial, and political influence is emerging—a “Jewish peace” that will replace the fading Pax Americana. Jiang’s lecture on the topic draws on biblical prophecy, historical models of diaspora power, and game‑theory calculations to argue that Jewish elites (especially in the U.S. and Israel) are uniquely positioned to steer global affairs without direct empire‑building. It’s a controversial, often conspiracy‑tinged forecast of a post‑Western hegemony.
“Pax Judaica Theory claims that within 50 years, the real capital won’t be Washington or Beijing—it’ll be Tel Aviv and New York City. The ‘chosen people’ will finally be the choosers, and the rest of us will just pay the rent.”
Pax Judaica Theory by Abzugal January 24, 2026