A stupid person with no personality or intelligence. A person with a very dull personality or insight. A square. A blockhead is usually a person with no street smarts; and is usually a do goody-gooder. Blockheads usually follow the rules in society and are conventional. They are very concrete and slow; hence the term "Blockhead".
Brandon is such a blockhead. He joins the Fire Department as a Firefighter and sees it as a form of status symbol to impress his girl and friends in his fake civilized life; when the reality is, most people can put out fires on their own, and the job actually requires very little skill. And he also boasts himself as a hero while he isn't hardly even making any money; as contrary to a Policeman, Marine or FBI agent.
by Abraham's Adversary October 02, 2018
Dear stalker; what makes ME so special anyway? Maybe you are just delusional. I really don't have anything to give to you.
by Abraham's Adversary February 28, 2018
The easiest and quickest excuse to get a Polish girlfriend. If you say that you're an American and she's free (single), Polish girl will be extremely friendly. Remember to talk in an American accent, and perfect it.
Polish girls cannot understand the fact that some American men are poor. They will always think American men are rich and smart. You can't convince them otherwise. In a weird, autistic way. (lol) They are so naive they consider alcoholism and fat American men to be a sign of "manliness". (A product of their isolation from Western society.)
Polish girls cannot understand the fact that some American men are poor. They will always think American men are rich and smart. You can't convince them otherwise. In a weird, autistic way. (lol) They are so naive they consider alcoholism and fat American men to be a sign of "manliness". (A product of their isolation from Western society.)
Canadian guy: How do I get with an extremely good Trophy girl?
Englishman: Just talk to a Polish girl and fake that you're an American. Talk with an American accent. She'll think you're rich as shite.
Englishman: Just talk to a Polish girl and fake that you're an American. Talk with an American accent. She'll think you're rich as shite.
by Abraham's Adversary January 15, 2018
Probably the best game in the whole Grand Theft Auto series. I was born in 1991 and got this game when I was 11, first day it was released!! This was the best GTA game in the series, in my opinion. It was more raw, "slapstick" and more original. A very fun game. GTA IV and GTA 5 were OK, but they totally pale in comparison to the PS2/Xbox Grand Theft Auto's. (just because they had more features and life-like graphics; doesn't make a game better. In my opinion!)
Interesting factoid: the song, "Running with the Night" by Lionel Richie on Flash FM, was later removed from later versions of the game. My copy of the game actually has it!! (I never knew this fact until recently.) Other songs that were later removed from the official game were: In a Big Country - Big Country (Flash FM), I Melt With You - Bad English (Wave 103), Save a Prayer - Duran Duran (Emotion 98.3) Burnin' For You - Blue Oyster Cult (VRock), Dead Man's Party - Oingo Boingo (Wave 103), Beat It - Michael Jackson (Flash FM) The Breaks - Kurtis Blow (Wildstyle) Looking for the Perfect Beat - Afrika Bambaataa (Wildstyle)
Some of these songs can actually still be heard in cutscenes during the game, though.
Interesting factoid: the song, "Running with the Night" by Lionel Richie on Flash FM, was later removed from later versions of the game. My copy of the game actually has it!! (I never knew this fact until recently.) Other songs that were later removed from the official game were: In a Big Country - Big Country (Flash FM), I Melt With You - Bad English (Wave 103), Save a Prayer - Duran Duran (Emotion 98.3) Burnin' For You - Blue Oyster Cult (VRock), Dead Man's Party - Oingo Boingo (Wave 103), Beat It - Michael Jackson (Flash FM) The Breaks - Kurtis Blow (Wildstyle) Looking for the Perfect Beat - Afrika Bambaataa (Wildstyle)
Some of these songs can actually still be heard in cutscenes during the game, though.
the GTA series hasn't ever been able to top a game as good since Vice City if you want my opinion. Also the best soundtrack in the Grand Theft Auto series, too.
Hint hint: Dan Houser and crew (Rockstar games) were basically just ripping off the movie Scarface a lil with Vice City, but it actually had an original storyline of it's own, and a perfect Miami 1980s theme. And you did NOT have to play as a stereotypical Cuban man. (more original plot and less stereotypical)
All the other action shooter games alt the time, made me want to put the controller down halfway into the game and bring it back to the rental store. (true crime, driver 3, scarface the game)
GTA hasn't ever been able to top a game since Vice City if you want my opinion.
Vice City is the game that got Rockstar Games rich and famous. The most legendary and groundbreaking video game since The Legend of Zelda - Ocarina of Time. San Andreas was a great game too and sold more, but it was just a follow-up from what Vice City had built.
Hint hint: Dan Houser and crew (Rockstar games) were basically just ripping off the movie Scarface a lil with Vice City, but it actually had an original storyline of it's own, and a perfect Miami 1980s theme. And you did NOT have to play as a stereotypical Cuban man. (more original plot and less stereotypical)
All the other action shooter games alt the time, made me want to put the controller down halfway into the game and bring it back to the rental store. (true crime, driver 3, scarface the game)
GTA hasn't ever been able to top a game since Vice City if you want my opinion.
Vice City is the game that got Rockstar Games rich and famous. The most legendary and groundbreaking video game since The Legend of Zelda - Ocarina of Time. San Andreas was a great game too and sold more, but it was just a follow-up from what Vice City had built.
by Abraham's Adversary November 23, 2018
An absolute brilliant German philosopher that is often overlooked, overshadowed, underappreciated and/or completely misunderstood. He could deconstruct logical aspects of human concepts that would blow your mind. Even people like Albert Einstein or Rene Descartes would never win; in an argument against Nietzsche. At least, according to Nietzsche's train of thought and his natural strict logic composition; in regards to metaphysics.
Rene Descartes always focuses on "essence" and "truth"; while Nietzsche argues that essence and truth are not real and are only ideas or figments of illusions in our conscious minds. Nietzsche focuses on the subconscious; while Descartes focuses on the conscious mind. "I think, therefore I am."
Nietzsche: You do not "think"!!. You only "believe" that "you think". Your brain is an organ struggling for life, just like your heart, liver, kidneys and everything else!
Descartes: I do not understand what you are saying, Nietzsche!
Nietzsche: You have missed the big picture entirely and focused on the irrelevant, simple matters.
Descartes: I still don't think I hear you!
Nietzsche: Likewise.
Rene Descartes always focuses on "essence" and "truth"; while Nietzsche argues that essence and truth are not real and are only ideas or figments of illusions in our conscious minds. Nietzsche focuses on the subconscious; while Descartes focuses on the conscious mind. "I think, therefore I am."
Nietzsche: You do not "think"!!. You only "believe" that "you think". Your brain is an organ struggling for life, just like your heart, liver, kidneys and everything else!
Descartes: I do not understand what you are saying, Nietzsche!
Nietzsche: You have missed the big picture entirely and focused on the irrelevant, simple matters.
Descartes: I still don't think I hear you!
Nietzsche: Likewise.
Albert Einstein: Doing something over and over again and expecting a different result is the definition of insanity.
Friedrich Nietzsche: No it isn't, Einstein! Doing something over and over again is NOT insanity. The very fact that you use the aspect/essence of "insanity" contradicts the whole concept of: A HAPPENING. A happening is just exactly that: A HAPPENING. An indifferent, recurrent happening. And it will always function in our indifferent universe as: a happening. It is only human judgement and interpretation that: a happening; will be thought of as "insanity". Therefore, doing something over and over again and expecting a different result is NOT insanity. Only human minds can determine what doing something over and over again is. Conclusion: IT IS NEITHER "INSANITY" NOR "SANITY"! IT IS A HAPPENING!
Einstein, Descartes and Everbody else: WOW! MIND = BLOWN
Friedrich Nietzsche: No it isn't, Einstein! Doing something over and over again is NOT insanity. The very fact that you use the aspect/essence of "insanity" contradicts the whole concept of: A HAPPENING. A happening is just exactly that: A HAPPENING. An indifferent, recurrent happening. And it will always function in our indifferent universe as: a happening. It is only human judgement and interpretation that: a happening; will be thought of as "insanity". Therefore, doing something over and over again and expecting a different result is NOT insanity. Only human minds can determine what doing something over and over again is. Conclusion: IT IS NEITHER "INSANITY" NOR "SANITY"! IT IS A HAPPENING!
Einstein, Descartes and Everbody else: WOW! MIND = BLOWN
by Abraham's Adversary October 09, 2018
What happened when Barack Obama was elected twice in America from 2008 to 2012. Between Obama's era, the Cajun population of Louisiana state in the USA experienced a horrific, massive (accidental) demographic collapse.
(People of Cajun decent lost their homes due to Obama's policies and also experienced high infant mortality rates (even higher than the Amish) - both due to poverty, and many Cajun people (mostly young men without a future) committed suicide. An event that occurred between 2008-2018 that almost went completely unnoticed to most Americans and the rest of the world.)
Unfortunately, these people were mostly of French and Basque ancestry. (ancestry that is actually very rare in the USA)
There are often more Cajun women today than there are Cajun men, because many of their men killed themselves because of economic devastation.
(People of Cajun decent lost their homes due to Obama's policies and also experienced high infant mortality rates (even higher than the Amish) - both due to poverty, and many Cajun people (mostly young men without a future) committed suicide. An event that occurred between 2008-2018 that almost went completely unnoticed to most Americans and the rest of the world.)
Unfortunately, these people were mostly of French and Basque ancestry. (ancestry that is actually very rare in the USA)
There are often more Cajun women today than there are Cajun men, because many of their men killed themselves because of economic devastation.
It is very sad that the Cajun population in the USA is dying and may never even see another generation. Barack Obama is responsible for the Second Cajun genocide. Most Cajun people are so poor that they can't even afford to have children, either. Or even think about raising big families like the past. (It's sad, but the Cajun ethnicity will soon become extinct.)
by Abraham's Adversary January 14, 2019
A field of study of numbers and logic that is illogical. Mathematics contradicts itself. Yes, it does. Ain't it weird? It is seen as a study that is practical; but is actually impractical, considering it is a paradox.
Pythagoras was wrong when he said that Mathematics is an absolute. Mathematics is not an absolute - because only human beings use and recognize Mathematics. Mathematics is an abstract concept or explanation for a HAPPENING in the universe. It is not a universal law; either. It is only just a clever illusion. A language and pattern of logic invented by human beings. (that only seems to make sense - because WE invented it; to make sense of the external universe.)
German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche was good in discrediting the Greeks; and making them look pretty stupid. Mathematics is only an illusion. It is not an absolute; but more of an accusation or of something that is apparent. It explains how objects work or go together. (Kind of like in languages where Indo-European grammar syntax is Nominative-Accusative; while the Basque language grammar syntax is Ergative-Absolutive.)
(When you think about it; Mathematics is just as logical as Music is. Monkeys/Apes can be taught to play instruments, but they do not understand music. They are only doing what they are told by humans, so they get rewarded with a treat.)
Pythagoras was wrong when he said that Mathematics is an absolute. Mathematics is not an absolute - because only human beings use and recognize Mathematics. Mathematics is an abstract concept or explanation for a HAPPENING in the universe. It is not a universal law; either. It is only just a clever illusion. A language and pattern of logic invented by human beings. (that only seems to make sense - because WE invented it; to make sense of the external universe.)
German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche was good in discrediting the Greeks; and making them look pretty stupid. Mathematics is only an illusion. It is not an absolute; but more of an accusation or of something that is apparent. It explains how objects work or go together. (Kind of like in languages where Indo-European grammar syntax is Nominative-Accusative; while the Basque language grammar syntax is Ergative-Absolutive.)
(When you think about it; Mathematics is just as logical as Music is. Monkeys/Apes can be taught to play instruments, but they do not understand music. They are only doing what they are told by humans, so they get rewarded with a treat.)
There are plenty of easy logical explanations for Mathematics contradicting itself. Observe in nature:
While Mathematics may apply to the Universe; it does not apply to Biology, organisms or life-forms. Only inanimate objects or abstract concepts. Strange huh? This is the logical problem of Mathematics. (at least; the Western version of it.)
For example: 1+1=1 most the time; when two humans have children. Sometimes it will equal triplets (3 children) and so on. And one can easily see the examples in Cats and Dogs or even Chicken/Ducks and other animals; who usually have a litter of descendants.
(And, why can't other animals do Math? They can only be taught it by humans; or learn from experience/instinct. Just like music instrument.)
So, I ask you, reader - if Mathematics is logical; does that mean that Life/Biology is illogical? Or is it the other way around? (That is the question. Just like "What came first - the chicken or the egg?") If Mathematics is only illusion and not absolute; this means that Pythagoras was wrong. ) In contrast; this would possibly explain that Zeno of Elea was actually right.)
Mathematics is always 99.9% There is no such thing as 100%. (this is why like in DNA paternity tests; the father will always come out as 99.9999999999% etc. in relation to a baby, and never 100%)
While Mathematics may apply to the Universe; it does not apply to Biology, organisms or life-forms. Only inanimate objects or abstract concepts. Strange huh? This is the logical problem of Mathematics. (at least; the Western version of it.)
For example: 1+1=1 most the time; when two humans have children. Sometimes it will equal triplets (3 children) and so on. And one can easily see the examples in Cats and Dogs or even Chicken/Ducks and other animals; who usually have a litter of descendants.
(And, why can't other animals do Math? They can only be taught it by humans; or learn from experience/instinct. Just like music instrument.)
So, I ask you, reader - if Mathematics is logical; does that mean that Life/Biology is illogical? Or is it the other way around? (That is the question. Just like "What came first - the chicken or the egg?") If Mathematics is only illusion and not absolute; this means that Pythagoras was wrong. ) In contrast; this would possibly explain that Zeno of Elea was actually right.)
Mathematics is always 99.9% There is no such thing as 100%. (this is why like in DNA paternity tests; the father will always come out as 99.9999999999% etc. in relation to a baby, and never 100%)
by Abraham's Adversary December 11, 2017