the bowel movement (especially in porn) when a woman poops out the liquid injected into her ass by anal sex. It looks like diarrhea, but it's all jizz
the porn star's gang-bang scene was capped off with a nice case of cumarrhea when she was flipped right-side-up and pooped out all the cum her group gave her
The mistake of dismissing an entire argument solely by labeling it with the name of a logical fallacy, without engaging with its underlying evidence, context, or potential merit. It's using fallacy identification as a rhetorical trump card to shut down discussion, rather than as a tool for clearer thinking. The presence of a fallacy in an argument's structure doesn't automatically make its conclusion false.
Example: "You're just using an ad hominem against the politician!" someone shouts, after you detailed the politician's corrupt actions. They've committed the Fallacy of Appeal to Fallacies. Pointing out a personal attack is valid, but if the personal attack is evidence (e.g., "they are corrupt because here are their bank records"), dismissing it only as a fallacy is a cheap way to avoid confronting the evidence.