a fallacy in which the argument proposes an explanation, but the mechanism proposed stands just as much in need of explanation as the original fact to be explained — and indeed it stands in need of the same kind of explanation. so it is tempting to apply the explanation to itself.
given the wordcosmological argument/word, the universe must have a beginning. the notion that the universe's origin came about by the random forming of particles in space, there must have been something to first put those particles there. whatever that something is, it must exist outside of time and always exist, lest you get into a series of arguments going further and further back until you have infinite regress.
example: the being 'linda' created all the particles that formed the earth, but who created linda? the being 'bill' created linda, but who created bill? etc. the argument goes on forever until there is a beginning, which was initially required according to the wordcosmological argument/word.
example: the being 'linda' created all the particles that formed the earth, but who created linda? the being 'bill' created linda, but who created bill? etc. the argument goes on forever until there is a beginning, which was initially required according to the wordcosmological argument/word.
by bud newman. February 28, 2003
Get the infinite regress mug.Before disussing the properties of a creator we have to assess if the universe was a created.
The cosmological argument assumes that there was a beginning, but it can again be contradicted simply by pointing out that the the matter which composes my body is eternal, never going to be created nor to be destroyed.
If we can`t prove that the universe was created, then we don`t need to think that actually a creator exists.
Second; the definition of God implies a being that is sentient. An eternal universe is absolutely not equal to a God because it lacks the capability of thinking.
Aristotele for example, believed that both God and Matter always existed, but yet he considered them to separate beings.
So I don`t really think that I'm calling the same thing under different names...
And I'll also ignore that puerile comment..
The cosmological argument assumes that there was a beginning, but it can again be contradicted simply by pointing out that the the matter which composes my body is eternal, never going to be created nor to be destroyed.
If we can`t prove that the universe was created, then we don`t need to think that actually a creator exists.
Second; the definition of God implies a being that is sentient. An eternal universe is absolutely not equal to a God because it lacks the capability of thinking.
Aristotele for example, believed that both God and Matter always existed, but yet he considered them to separate beings.
So I don`t really think that I'm calling the same thing under different names...
And I'll also ignore that puerile comment..
by .... March 3, 2003
Get the infinite regress mug.Related Words
The recursive redaction of an old religious-philosophical argument of how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.
No, Reverend Phalwell, taken to its infinite regress the King James 1611 edition proves inerrantly that 16,751 angels could fit on the head of a pin but they'd dance only at the risk of eternal damnation and hellfire!
by megnao flimpis July 12, 2003
Get the infinite regress mug.just noting that god exists outside of the universe, and is thus not subject to its laws; given that he created them along with the universe itself. any creation or destruction of the universe or anything in it is done by god outside of the universe itself see: hebrew word 'barra' meaning 'to create from nothing'.
oh. and if the universe simply existed, the universe would be god. you're just calling it a different name. read a book, kid.
oh. and if the universe simply existed, the universe would be god. you're just calling it a different name. read a book, kid.
if you look up infinite regress anywhere other than this site, you will get the same definition as listed above. cheers.
by nobody in here but us chickens! March 2, 2003
Get the infinite regress mug.by harry flashman July 12, 2003
Get the infinite regress mug.Exactly what it sounds like. An emo who has been repressed, most likely due to the breaking up of My Chemical Romance. If they here Welcome to the Black Parade, they will get emotional probably
Example 1:
That One Guy Who Delivers Bad News: "Dude, MCR broke up the other day!"
Innocent Fellow Emo:"What! I have to check on Kyle! He's probably already a repressed emo!"
Example 2:
Quote on Quote"Filthy Pranker": Hey dude, check out this song
*Plays Welcome to the Black Parade*
Totally Unsuspecting Repressed Emo; "Why?!?!? You know I'm a repressed emo dude!" *Starts getting emotional*
That One Guy Who Delivers Bad News: "Dude, MCR broke up the other day!"
Innocent Fellow Emo:"What! I have to check on Kyle! He's probably already a repressed emo!"
Example 2:
Quote on Quote"Filthy Pranker": Hey dude, check out this song
*Plays Welcome to the Black Parade*
Totally Unsuspecting Repressed Emo; "Why?!?!? You know I'm a repressed emo dude!" *Starts getting emotional*
by Just.Him.Again June 11, 2017
Get the repressed emo mug.Age regression is when somebody reverts to a child-like state of mind, often as a coping mechanism for things like PTSD, depression, anxiety, and other mental health issues. Basically age regressors are more at-peace and worry-free whilst in "little space" (A term for when one is in said mindset). These people simply need breaks from the stress of being old and often have a childish personality even outside of regression (Though sometimes it's not as obvious).
Contrary to popular belief, age regression is NOT a kink or even related to sexual intercourse whatsoever. Some age regressors refer to themselves as littles and to their significant other as "Daddy", "Mommy", or just as their "Caregiver" Since they'd typically take care of their "Little" as if they're an actual child.
Contrary to popular belief, age regression is NOT a kink or even related to sexual intercourse whatsoever. Some age regressors refer to themselves as littles and to their significant other as "Daddy", "Mommy", or just as their "Caregiver" Since they'd typically take care of their "Little" as if they're an actual child.
Hey, so why does she sleep with so many stuffed animals? Oh, she's just an age regressor. How cute!
Bro, what's with the pacifier? You a baby now or something?
Kinda, I'm regressing right now.
Sorry, I didn't know! That's cool!
Why does your blog have so much pastel And childish stuff?
Oh, it's an age regression blog. Nice!
Bro, what's with the pacifier? You a baby now or something?
Kinda, I'm regressing right now.
Sorry, I didn't know! That's cool!
Why does your blog have so much pastel And childish stuff?
Oh, it's an age regression blog. Nice!
by Possibly a demon child February 26, 2017
Get the age regression mug.