Weaponization of Science

The practice of using scientific authority, language, and prestige to advance non-scientific agendas—whether corporate, political, or personal. The weaponizer of science doesn't do science; they use science as a rhetorical shield, cherry-picking studies that support their position, funding research designed to produce desired results, attacking scientists whose findings threaten their interests, and cultivating doubt where none exists in the scientific community. It's the rhetorical equivalent of wearing a lab coat to sell cigarettes. The weaponization of science is most visible in controversies where industry interests conflict with public health—tobacco, climate change, opioids—but it infects every domain where science has authority and someone wants to exploit it.

Weaponization of Science Example: "The company weaponized science for decades, funding studies that showed their product was safe, attacking researchers who found otherwise, and cultivating doubt in the public mind. When the truth finally emerged—they'd known all along—the weapon had done its damage. Millions had suffered while the appearance of science protected the perpetrators."

Weaponization of Science by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 16, 2026

Weaponization of Science Communication

The practice of using the channels and techniques of science communication—popularization, simplification, engagement—not to inform but to manipulate, deceive, or advance hidden agendas. The weaponizer of science communication doesn't want to share knowledge; they want to shape perceptions, create false balance, manufacture doubt, or build trust only to exploit it. It's the rhetorical equivalent of a friendly doctor who's actually selling snake oil. The weaponization of science communication is especially dangerous because it mimics trustworthy forms—science YouTubers who subtly promote pseudoscience, journalists who give equal weight to consensus and fringe views, educators who present ideology as fact. The weapon works because we're trained to trust science communication; the weaponizer exploits that trust.

Weaponization of Science Communication Example: "He watched a popular science channel that had been weaponized—subtle promotion of dubious supplements, gentle dismissal of consensus views, friendly hosts who built trust and then abused it. The science communication looked real, felt real, but was carefully crafted to sell, not inform. He stopped watching, but millions didn't. The weapon was still working."

Weaponization of Science Communication by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 16, 2026

Cheeks 

An Irish phrase meaning shit, derived from ass
(Not to be confused with the literal description of one's buttocks)

"Did you hear the song Aylek$ dropped?"
"Hardly. Her music is absolute cheeks."

"My boyfriend say LaFlame is cheeks."
"Tell your boyfriend I said it's his mixtape that's cheeks."

Cheeks by thecartisan April 26, 2020

sans sheriff 

Lawless use of fonts or typography, with no regard to aesthetics or legibility

I'm putting this CV straight in the bin. Written totally sans sheriff.

sans sheriff by Jamarley July 3, 2019

Breadhead 

Someone who is addicted to obtaining money and building wealth. A money addict and fanatic. Breadheads often work more than one full-time job, and some even participate in illicit activities to "obtain the bread".

A breadhead is like a crackhead, but for money instead of crack.

Breadhead by 🅱️ U S 3 4 8 March 30, 2022

Stink lines

As seen in illustrations or cartoons: Wavy, vertical lines rising above a person, place or thing. Denotes a foul odor.

"You didn't put enough stink lines on your picture of the teacher."

Stink lines by Athene Airheart March 14, 2004

schmegegge 

Yiddish slang word meaning bullshit, baloney, hogwash, nonsense, crock of shit or hot air.

I don't buy the schmegegge about Morty sleeping with Moira.
His version of the story was pure schmegegge.
The whole schmegegge was made up to get Liz a little bit of attention.

schmegegge by budsbabe February 1, 2008