the suigi problem

A phenomenon in the Super Mario 64 speedrunning scene in which the runner Suigi holds all major world records across the five core categories — 0-Star, 1-Star, 16-Star, 70-Star, and 120-Star — raising concerns about competitive stagnation and the sustainability of the game’s speedrun meta.

Speedrunning communities often rely on rivalry, specialization, and the ever-present possibility of an upset to remain vibrant. The Suigi Problem disrupts this balance. Suigi’s total dominance across every major category breaks from the long-standing tradition where different runners excel in different niches — some mastering the glitch-heavy short categories, others grinding the endurance-based long runs.

By conquering every category, Suigi not only redefined what individual mastery looks like, but also inadvertently diminished the competitive drive for others. With no world records left to chase, top runners face a choice: try to dethrone a near-flawless reign, or move on. As a result, the Suigi Problem has come to symbolize a paradox in speedrunning — where perfection, once achieved, may end the very competition that created it.

“This isn’t just a sweep — it’s the Suigi Problem. There’s nothing left to beat.”
“Unless GTM can do it, SM64 might need a whole new meta to survive the Suigi Problem.”

by joeyishna October 3, 2025

Hard Problem of the Demarcation Problem

The meta-problem: There is no agreed-upon rule to distinguish science from non-science, and the very search for such a rule may be unscientific. Falsifiability (Popper) fails—string theory isn't easily falsifiable but is considered science. Astrology makes falsifiable claims but is pseudoscience. Methodological naturalism? It rules out theology but also historical sciences that reconstruct unique past events. The hard problem is that "science" is a family-resemblance concept, not a neat category. Any bright-line rule you propose either excludes legitimate sciences or lets in obvious pseudoscience, revealing that demarcation is a social and philosophical negotiation, not a logical one.

Example: Is evolutionary biology science? It reconstructs unique past events (unfalsifiable in a strict lab sense). Yet it's a core science. Is phrenology pseudoscience? It used measurement and data (the "scientific method" of its day). The hard problem: We know the difference intuitively, but can't define it without circular logic ("It's science because scientists do it"). The demarcation criteria are like trying to nail jelly to a wall—the harder you try, the messier it gets, and you're left wondering why you're nailing jelly in the first place. Hard Problem of the Demarcation Problem.

by Nammugal January 24, 2026

Hard Problem of the Demarcation Problem

The prediction problem. Unlike in physics, where you can isolate variables and predict an eclipse to the second, social sciences (economics, political science, sociology) deal with complex, reflexive systems. Humans react to predictions, changing the outcome (the "Lucas Critique"). The hard problem is: Can you have a real science of human society if its core subjects alter their behavior upon hearing your findings? True scientific laws are supposed to be invariant. Social "laws" are more like trends that expire once people know about them, making the field perpetually one step behind a moving target.

Example: An economist develops a perfect model predicting stock market crashes. Once published, investors see it and adjust their behavior to avoid the predicted conditions, thereby preventing the very crash the model forecasted. The model is now wrong. The hard problem: The act of studying the system changes it. This makes falsification—the bedrock of science—incredibly tricky. Social science thus often ends up explaining the past very well (postdiction) but failing at predicting the future, which is what we usually want from a science. Hard Problem of the Demarcation Problem.

by Nammugal January 24, 2026

Hard Problem of the Hard Problem

The dilution and trivialization of the term "Hard Problem" itself. Originally coined by David Chalmers for the problem of consciousness, it referred to questions that resist standard scientific methods due to their first-person, experiential nature. The "Hard Problem of the Hard Problem" is that the term has now been slapped onto every difficult, unresolved, or paradoxical issue in every field, from the "Hard Problem of Biology" to the "Hard Problem of Coffee Making." This overuse drains it of its specific philosophical power and turns it into a rhetorical cliché meaning "this is really tricky." The original, profound mystery gets lost in a crowd of imposter problems.

Example: Someone says, "The real Hard Problem is getting my Wi-Fi to reach the backyard." By jokingly or ignorantly equating a mere technical annoyance with the existential mystery of subjective experience, they trivialize the original concept. The hard problem: When every problem is "hard," none are. The term's power was in its specificity—pointing to an explanatory gap that seems to require a paradigm shift. Its memeification has turned it into just another way to say "this is confusing," robbing us of a precise tool for identifying genuine philosophical frontiers. Hard Problem of the Hard Problem.

by Enkigal January 24, 2026

The What The Fuck Is You Problem The

The What The Fuck Is You Problem The

The What The Fuck Is You Problem The

by Angel234IsTheDarkSeraphim April 13, 2025

The Pee-Noise Problem

1.) A constant feeling that the noise of one's pee stream hitting the water produces a less manly noise than those of his fellow bathroom guests...suggesting that he has an inadequate sized dong.

2.) A sign that your prostate may in fact be creeping its way up the weinershaft. If your pee-noise suddenly becomes less manly, talk to a doctor.

Man one: **loud and thunderious pee noise**
Man one's thoughts: Thank god I don't have the pee-noise problem

Man two: **high pitched pee noise"
Man two's thoughts: Does this mean I got a small dick? Maybe he just has a small dick hole... why do I have a small dick hole? Do small dick holes mean small dicks? HOW SMALL IS TOO SMALL FOR A HOLE TO BE THE SMALL HOLE OF A SMALL DICK!!?????

by SmallGlovesSmallSocks March 29, 2011

The 1 meter problem

When your dick is 1 meter long , and have to put it down your pants, making it hard to hide and making walking with it uncomfortable.

guy 1: why is Joe always walking so strange?
guy 2: Joe has The 1 meter problem.
guy 1: geez, i guess size does not always matter...

by calasin June 4, 2017