The idea that the number of objects in a universe is only countable by the surface area of the materialist-frequentist line.
Paradigm of a surface area as a counter of the objects in a system-in-totum.
Paradigm of a surface area as a counter of the objects in a system-in-totum.
The materialist frequentist line is the only discrete line-with-no-surface-area.
Godelism proffers that countable objects are tautological to countable systems. In other words a countable object must first be a countable SYSTEM.
Godelism gives rise to material frequentism--which states that the sum of the surface-exteriors of all countable objects anneal to a discrete line with no surface area.
Godelism proffers that countable objects are tautological to countable systems. In other words a countable object must first be a countable SYSTEM.
Godelism gives rise to material frequentism--which states that the sum of the surface-exteriors of all countable objects anneal to a discrete line with no surface area.
by metastatic February 27, 2022
Superfrequentism is a paradigm which proffers a 1-to-1 relationship between the infinite number of perimeter-points inside of a non-Tarski shape and the infinite number of perimeter-points outside of a skeuomorph.
Super-frequentism proposes a bijective relationship between the internalized perimeter-points of a non-Tarski space and the externalized perimeter-points of a skeuomorph.
by zanderfin November 10, 2021
Idea that designs of sound gather in a circle around a skeuomorph.
The idea that sound-in-a-straight line circumscribes the edge of skeuomorphs.
The idea that sound-in-a-straight line circumscribes the edge of skeuomorphs.
Pop frequentism says that linear sound creates local heat resolution at the skeuomorph-edge.
It is the natural stellerator.
It is the natural stellerator.
by metawave February 22, 2022
by Donic October 16, 2015
From Latin Frequenter meaning "often/in-great-numbers" and Mendax meaning "false/deceptive". The phrase is used to describe things that have been proven wrong so many times that they are no longer worth debating or considering scientifically.
Person 1: "Why don't scientists fight more flat earthers?"
Person 2: "Because the flat earth theory is frequenter mendax; its not worth disproving what has been disproved over and over again."
Person 2: "Because the flat earth theory is frequenter mendax; its not worth disproving what has been disproved over and over again."
by hihi24522 May 25, 2023