Someone who is hot and cool at the same time, creating a patadox
The man posseses this paradox is awsome and all the girls like him
The man posseses this paradox is awsome and all the girls like him
by The paradoxer December 05, 2016
Someone who is hot and cool at the same time, creating a patadox
The man posseses this paradox is awsome and all the girls like him
The man posseses this paradox is awsome and all the girls like him
by The paradoxer December 05, 2016
Xala somehow has every unit in the game, while also not having any units at all. The second that he is conscious of the unit the wave function collapses to materialize it.
"Hey have you seen TrueWhale's new drafts?" "Yeah man I think he's just going back to the original style with his 'new' LDs" "Oh man he must have the Xala Paradox"
by ComfortsEmbrace February 16, 2024
The "Looters Paradox" is a phenomenon that occurs in survival games and looter shooters, where the Player or "Looter" cannot find the item they are desperately looking for when they are putting their effort into looking for it, but will find it when they've forgotten about it or are looking for a completely different item.
It's a frustrating battle with a games RNG that always seems to target you at odd moments. For example, if the player is looking for an "Apple", they will not find the apple, but will only find Bananas and Oranges. But the moment they top looking for the Apple and start looking for the Bananas and Oranges, they will only find the apple.
It's a frustrating battle with a games RNG that always seems to target you at odd moments. For example, if the player is looking for an "Apple", they will not find the apple, but will only find Bananas and Oranges. But the moment they top looking for the Apple and start looking for the Bananas and Oranges, they will only find the apple.
"Ugh, I've been looking for this item for hours, but I just cannot find it! I hate the looters paradox!"
"Wh-... what the f---? Why is it always that, when I stop looking for this item, it is all I will ever find?!"
"Wh-... what the f---? Why is it always that, when I stop looking for this item, it is all I will ever find?!"
by P3trich0r July 19, 2024
by cshenriksen May 11, 2020
The sum of two singular expressions which intuitively makes sense but the PLURAL is never conclusive and because of that in the first place both SINGULARS ARE INACCURATE to reach the PLURAL which is there where the paradox formation occurs.
E.9 A.15 I.22 T.27 D.27 O.28 R.30 H.33 F.35 S.38 C.38 U.40 G.40 L.42 W.42 Q.42 N.45 P.45 B.46 Y.47 K.51 J.52 M.53 V.66 X.68 Z.72
In this example the SUMMATIONS individually of EACH CIRCLE comes very close in EQUALING TOTAL DEGREES IN A CIRCLE but the PLURAL itself is 153 DEGREES OFF.
E.9 A.15 I.22 T.27 D.27 O.28 R.30 H.33 F.35 S.38 C.38 U.40 G.40 L.42 W.42 Q.42 N.45 P.45 B.46 Y.47 K.51 J.52 M.53 V.66 X.68 Z.72
In this example the SUMMATIONS individually of EACH CIRCLE comes very close in EQUALING TOTAL DEGREES IN A CIRCLE but the PLURAL itself is 153 DEGREES OFF.
CIRCLE.179 CIRCLE.179 CIRCLE CIRCLE.358
CIRCLES.217
THE PARADOXICAL SUMMATIONS of CIRCLE in the SINGULAR form does not lead to the SUMMATIONS in the PLURAL FORM.
The PARADOXICAL SUMMATIONS CIRCLE CIRCLE.358 almost equals the number of DEGREES in a CIRCLE by using the two PLURAL taken each ELEMENT SEPARATELY IF you counted each CIRCLE as a DEGREE it indeed would EQUAL 360 DEGREES as if counting the TWO DEGREES OF FREEDOM.
CIRCLES.217
THE PARADOXICAL SUMMATIONS of CIRCLE in the SINGULAR form does not lead to the SUMMATIONS in the PLURAL FORM.
The PARADOXICAL SUMMATIONS CIRCLE CIRCLE.358 almost equals the number of DEGREES in a CIRCLE by using the two PLURAL taken each ELEMENT SEPARATELY IF you counted each CIRCLE as a DEGREE it indeed would EQUAL 360 DEGREES as if counting the TWO DEGREES OF FREEDOM.
by SEE YOUR ASSH0LE May 08, 2021
when a man claims he is against paying a prostitute for sex, yet gets angry when the woman he is on a date with does not have sex with him when he had paid for said date
guy: yeah dude i paid for the hotel and everything and she didn’t even hook up with me after
guy 2: so you’re basically saying you paid money for the sole purpose of this girl to have sex with you?
guy: no man it’s not the same i swear
guy 2: that’s the prostitute paradox man
guy 2: so you’re basically saying you paid money for the sole purpose of this girl to have sex with you?
guy: no man it’s not the same i swear
guy 2: that’s the prostitute paradox man
by FlameWeaver March 25, 2022