Skip to main content

I'm DoInG eVeRyThInG yOu SaId!

Really. This ☝️ is all this is. You saying that back at me in response to everything I say.
An Imbecile "I'm DoInG eVeRyThInG yOu SaId! I'm DoInG eVeRyThInG yOu SaId! I'm DoInG eVeRyThInG yOu SaId!"

Hym "I bet you wish you would have done the 'stop the weaponized schizophrenia from getting your kids murdered part.' Because I told you how to do that... You DIDN'T DO THAT... And now you are trying to do it without me and I just shouldn't have to be left out of it. I'm not to blame for that. You need to come here to me. You need to let me explain what is happening. You need to confirm the veracity of the claim I'm making. And then you need to stop siging off on it what it happens to people."

An Imbecile "I'm DoInG eVeRyThInG yOu SaId! I'm DoInG eVeRyThInG yOu SaId!"

The Clown That Raped Everything (1983)

A lost horror movie (Rated PG) directed by Steve Miner exclusively released in Arkansas.
The Clown That Raped Everything (1983) was pulled form shelves after multiple parents found that it was unsuitable for MOST children after viewing the infamous "Slutty Pancakes!" scene.

Hard Problem of Everything

The self-defeating nature of a total theory. A "Theory of Everything" in physics seeks to unify all fundamental forces. But the hard problem is that even a perfect physical theory would not explain everything—it wouldn't explain why those particular laws exist, why there is something rather than nothing, the nature of consciousness, meaning, ethics, or beauty. More paradoxically, if a human brain is just a system obeying those physical laws, then the theory itself—and our belief in it—is just a predetermined output of the system. This undermines the very rationality and truth-seeking that produced the theory. Ultimate explanation swallows itself.
Example: Imagine physicists finally write the equation of the Theory of Everything on a blackboard. The hard problem: That equation cannot explain why it, itself, is aesthetically beautiful to the physicists. It cannot explain the feeling of awe they have. It cannot justify why logical consistency is a valid path to truth. It is a description of a meaningless clockwork, in which the clockwork's own description of itself is just another gear turning. A complete theory of the physical world leaves out the theorist, creating a Grand Explanation from which the explainer is mysteriously absent. Hard Problem of Everything.

blocked them on everything

when someone blocks someone else on all socials or all socials they have
"I got so mad at him, I blocked them on everything."

Theory of Constructed Everything

The radical endpoint of social constructionism: the argument that all of human reality—not just social facts like money, but our experience of time, space, the self, and even seemingly brute physical facts—is mediated through and shaped by the conceptual and linguistic systems we collectively build. It's the realization that we are born into a world that is already thickly pre-constructed, and we spend our lives navigating, reinforcing, and sometimes remaking those constructions.
Example: "Looking at a sunset, I see 'beauty' and 'the end of the day'—both constructed concepts. A physicist sees 'Rayleigh scattering' and 'planetary rotation'—other constructed concepts from a different framework. The Theory of Constructed Everything suggests there is no access to the sunset-in-itself; we only ever experience it through the various reality-tunnels our cultures and sciences have built for us. We live in a house of ideas, and mistake it for the sky."

Confirmation Bias of Everything

A philosophical dead-end stemming from a misreading of Kant, which asserts that all human perception and cognition is nothing but confirmation bias. Since we can never know the "thing-in-itself" (noumenon) and only interpret phenomena through our mental categories, this view claims every observation is simply confirming the pre-existing structures of our mind. It’s a radical skepticism that makes genuine learning or surprise impossible, reducing all experience to a tautological loop.
Example: After a surprising scientific discovery that overturns a theory, someone dismisses it by saying, "The new data only 'confirms' the scientists' hidden bias toward novelty. They were biased to find a change, just as the old guard was biased to find stability. It's all just confirmation bias of everything." This nihilistic take uses epistemology to void empirical evidence entirely.