by Vtgcycvttvctt June 4, 2022
Get the Wikipedia mug."Wikipedia does not count."
"Wikipedia is not a reliable source."
"Don't even ask if you can use Wikipedia."
"Wikipedia is useful in understanding the basics of a subject."
"Wikipedia is not a reliable source."
"Don't even ask if you can use Wikipedia."
"Wikipedia is useful in understanding the basics of a subject."
by Druff, Dan September 23, 2017
Get the wikipedia mug.The whole fking system is totally gamed from top to bottom. Just like everything else (chrome, Gemini AI results)
by Hello-553669 March 22, 2025
Get the Wikipedia mug.Your wikipedia doesn't stand up to the facts.
by PeaceMarauder November 9, 2023
Get the Wikipedia mug.
Get the Wikipedia mug.Something that has enough importance to actually be on Wikipedia, in contrast to what you can find no trace of on there. Hence, "worthy of Wikipedia," or Wikipedia-worthy. Since users from across the world can edit or add to Wikipedia, the lack of information on a specific topic marks its sheer unimportance or obscurity.
Person 1: Hey, listen to this band, it's great.
Person 2: Are you kidding me? It's not Wikipedia-worthy; I just checked.
Person 1: Come on, man, give it a try. No one knows who they are, but they're so awesome.
Person 2: Are you kidding me? It's not Wikipedia-worthy; I just checked.
Person 1: Come on, man, give it a try. No one knows who they are, but they're so awesome.
by RealTawk November 23, 2010
Get the Wikipedia-worthy mug.A topical progression that leads into infinite topical regress which begins with an inquiry into factual content about one specific topic that leads into factual content about multiple related sub-topics, sub-sub-topics, and ad infinitum sub-sub-topics.
"I googled 'Roald Amundsen' and knew I'd gone down a 'Wikipedia rabbit hole' when I ended up reading the lyrics to the 'Star Spangled Banner'."
by gDog71 June 8, 2021
Get the 'Wikipedia rabbit hole' mug.