To be scrutinized to the point of embarrassment. Usually by exposing critical flaws and weaknesses that prove the described entity unviable, usually by self-inflicted catastrophic failure.
That US womans national soccer team got hanked by the English sports commentators after their claims that they were invincible.
by Dimdamdum May 16, 2025
/hænkt/ Verb: To be scrutinized to the point of embarrassment. Usually by exposing critical flaws and weaknesses that prove the described entity unviable, usually by self-inflicted catastrophic failure.
“I hope the hybrid I created didn’t get Hanked!”
by Annie445 May 19, 2025
To be scrutinized to the point of embarrassment. Usually by exposing critical flaws and weaknesses that prove the described entity unviable, usually by self-inflicted catastrophic failure. (from GojiCenter)
by harristsangyt/yasmin June 08, 2025
To be scrutinized to the point of embarrasment. Usually by exposing critical flaws and weaknesses that prove the described entity unviable, usually by self-inflicted catastrophic failure.
**Person 1:** Hey did see the hybrid made by Dangerville to rival Indominus 2.0?
**Person 2:** Yeah! Turns out that murder monkey couldn't even walk.
**Person 1:** Well it can still live unlike Hank.
**Person 2:** Haha! Yeah, imagine making a Hybrid so bad that its arm explodes after the first hit! And dont even get me started to the jaws!
**Person 1:** Yeah even its name makes fun of GojiGuy's Hybrid.
**Person 2:** Damn, you can say that Hank got Hanked!
**Person 2:** Yeah! Turns out that murder monkey couldn't even walk.
**Person 1:** Well it can still live unlike Hank.
**Person 2:** Haha! Yeah, imagine making a Hybrid so bad that its arm explodes after the first hit! And dont even get me started to the jaws!
**Person 1:** Yeah even its name makes fun of GojiGuy's Hybrid.
**Person 2:** Damn, you can say that Hank got Hanked!
by Princeps Septentrionalis May 16, 2025
If your the guy who fucks anything that walks and has been with more then 10 girls you didnt know their name, you might be a Hank Skoe.
by SoooooCALI619 September 07, 2011
A brutal form of academic torture in which a student is forced to read an impossibly hard historical primary source. They are asked unanswerable questions in the second person, are triggered by rude historical quotes, and a few pages in are referred to a figure at the back of the reading, all while screaming and crying. This torture is inescapable and will almost always result in a tremendous headache unless you are a fucking whale who makes her idiot boyfriend go through it instead.
Then, read Wiesner-Hanks: "A Day in the French Revolution: July 14, 1789" and answer the following questions:
1. Why would the Bastille be a place crowds would naturally gather? What evidence do the documents give to answer this question?
2. How did the layout of Paris help or hinder large protests? How did Parisian architecture help unhappy residents join a political cause? What evidence do the documents give to answer this question?
3. How did news of action on the streets spread around Paris? How would that help or hinder protestors and, on the other hand, the government in controlling protests? What evidence do the documents give to answer this question?
4. How did the price of wheat affect every citizen? Consider the impact of high prices on each socioeconomic group in your answer. What evidence do the documents give to answer this question?
5. How did a person's socioeconomic status impact their willingness to either join the protest or support the government (and status quo)? What evidence do the documents give to answer this question?
6. If you were in the working class living in Paris in 1789, do you think you would have joined the protests? Why or why not? Use specific evidence from the documents in the Wiesner-Hanks packet to support your answer.
1. Why would the Bastille be a place crowds would naturally gather? What evidence do the documents give to answer this question?
2. How did the layout of Paris help or hinder large protests? How did Parisian architecture help unhappy residents join a political cause? What evidence do the documents give to answer this question?
3. How did news of action on the streets spread around Paris? How would that help or hinder protestors and, on the other hand, the government in controlling protests? What evidence do the documents give to answer this question?
4. How did the price of wheat affect every citizen? Consider the impact of high prices on each socioeconomic group in your answer. What evidence do the documents give to answer this question?
5. How did a person's socioeconomic status impact their willingness to either join the protest or support the government (and status quo)? What evidence do the documents give to answer this question?
6. If you were in the working class living in Paris in 1789, do you think you would have joined the protests? Why or why not? Use specific evidence from the documents in the Wiesner-Hanks packet to support your answer.
by hedabla99 November 07, 2016
A man well known for not being able to hold his mud..and tries to sit down on a vasaline toilet lid and slide off and muds the room
by Memo watkins November 20, 2016