by xploger August 6, 2010

an indescribable quality or something; something about a person that you cannot put your finger on; je ne sais quoi
by weave March 18, 2003

Folk-punk record label that has produced records for bands such as Los Gatos Negros, Ghost Mice, Against Me!, Rosa, and This Bike is a Pipe Bomb. Bands on Plan-it-X are enjoyed by people who shower semiannually and ride their bikes to Food Not Bombs every week. It's great music, so check it out.
Kid: Hey dude, I just got this Plan-it-X comp for $3. Score!
Dumb Kid: Dude, that hippie shit's not cool. It'll never be as PUNX RAWX as The Casualties! Oi oi oi!
Kid: *throws pie from Safeway dumpster at dumb kid*
Dumb Kid: Dude, that hippie shit's not cool. It'll never be as PUNX RAWX as The Casualties! Oi oi oi!
Kid: *throws pie from Safeway dumpster at dumb kid*
by Lily P. July 7, 2006

a $10 bill (from "X" which is the Roman numeral for 10).
by Robbie July 31, 2005

by Cpt. Morgan C:=X May 29, 2010

The best band of all fuckin time.
They beat out any other band in the genre of hardcore metal. And the guys hair is cool
They beat out any other band in the genre of hardcore metal. And the guys hair is cool
by STATIC-X RULES May 23, 2003

A term used primarily in Colorado to describe Policy Debate. It is a type of debate where two debate teams (made up of two members each) are paired up, each team being assigned either Negative or Affirmative. The affirmative team presents a plan adhering (usually) to that year's resolution, while it is the negative team's job to prove what is bad about passing the plan (using such arguments as Disadvantages, Topicality, Counter-Plans, Kritiks, and answers to Inherency/Solvency/Advantages). Cross-x, or CX, is what makes speech tournaments take forever because each round has a minimum 1 hour of speaking.
As CX debate evolved, the debaters realized that the more arguments you can read, the more likely you are to win the round. So, a new style of reading evidence evolved, called "spreading" (a clever combination of "speed" and "reading"). While this is a good idea in theory, some debaters choose excessive speed over clarity, not realizing that almost all judges aren't going to vote for you if they can't understand what you're saying.
Finally, there is a myriad of critics who claim that debaters live in an "ivory tower" mindset. For God's sake, it's a game! Debate's an after-school activity! Don't criticize high-schoolers for viewing the world as they do. They aren't real policy makers, they only pretend to be.
As CX debate evolved, the debaters realized that the more arguments you can read, the more likely you are to win the round. So, a new style of reading evidence evolved, called "spreading" (a clever combination of "speed" and "reading"). While this is a good idea in theory, some debaters choose excessive speed over clarity, not realizing that almost all judges aren't going to vote for you if they can't understand what you're saying.
Finally, there is a myriad of critics who claim that debaters live in an "ivory tower" mindset. For God's sake, it's a game! Debate's an after-school activity! Don't criticize high-schoolers for viewing the world as they do. They aren't real policy makers, they only pretend to be.
by Lazy Fox February 28, 2009
