A way of figuring out what is going to happen in any television show--particularly CSI--because of universal constants of things that just have to happen in the show (read examples). This isn't because of the episode itself, but because of the formula of the show. This includes game shows, dramas, sitcoms, anime and even video games.
"He can't be the bad guy, it's only five minutes into the episode!"
"New person on the team for no reason? He's totally the murderer. Typical CSI logic."
"The main character isn't gonna die, there's still like 500 more episodes left!"
"I knew someone was going to die, because it's the series finale."
"He's not going to win the million dollars, there's only like five minutes left!"
"It's an anime about an MMORPG, the main character has to marry the first female character he meets."
"New person on the team for no reason? He's totally the murderer. Typical CSI logic."
"The main character isn't gonna die, there's still like 500 more episodes left!"
"I knew someone was going to die, because it's the series finale."
"He's not going to win the million dollars, there's only like five minutes left!"
"It's an anime about an MMORPG, the main character has to marry the first female character he meets."
by Ferriswheel31 November 29, 2012

to argue a point even though you are completely wrong. however, when asked to state your reasoning you completely warp the original argument thereby validating your own.
the inability to listen to someone else's arguments when having a debate.
the inability to listen to someone else's arguments when having a debate.
the "buni"- i would rather have 1$ than 1.01$ since 1$ is equal to 1.01$
others- clearly 1.01 is greater than 1, what are you talking about?
the "buni"- well within the given range they are the same.
others-wtf??? buni logic
others- clearly 1.01 is greater than 1, what are you talking about?
the "buni"- well within the given range they are the same.
others-wtf??? buni logic
by sanej November 17, 2010

by SoulCrazy13 May 22, 2018

A process of thinking that is based fundamentally on a few simple steps:
1) Be wrong. If at any time you think you may be right, you have exited the bounds of Ingrid Logic.
2) He who is inferior is always right. If you are the third wheel in a two-person argument and are choosing a side, always make sure to come to the rescue of the weaker party.
3) Deny all attacks on your credibility. Anyone who says you're wrong cannot be right because in your mind, you are NOT wrong.
4) Discredit opponents of Ingrid Logic. If, God forbid, anyone calls you out on suspicion of applying Ingrid Logic, attempt to prove that they themselves are wrong with such clever lines as "no" and "you're mean."
5) Once Ingrid Logic, always Ingrid Logic. You must always resist attempts to convert you into an intelligent person by constantly denying being wrong in the first place. If one were to apply too much pressure in attempting to smartify you, just agree with them but continue to use Ingrid Logic.
If a user of Ingrid Logic is encountered, DO NOT attempt to argue with him/her. Scientists at MIT found in a 2006 study that Ingrid Logic is infallible. Interestingly enough, this is the same study that found the leading cause of brain aneurysms.
1) Be wrong. If at any time you think you may be right, you have exited the bounds of Ingrid Logic.
2) He who is inferior is always right. If you are the third wheel in a two-person argument and are choosing a side, always make sure to come to the rescue of the weaker party.
3) Deny all attacks on your credibility. Anyone who says you're wrong cannot be right because in your mind, you are NOT wrong.
4) Discredit opponents of Ingrid Logic. If, God forbid, anyone calls you out on suspicion of applying Ingrid Logic, attempt to prove that they themselves are wrong with such clever lines as "no" and "you're mean."
5) Once Ingrid Logic, always Ingrid Logic. You must always resist attempts to convert you into an intelligent person by constantly denying being wrong in the first place. If one were to apply too much pressure in attempting to smartify you, just agree with them but continue to use Ingrid Logic.
If a user of Ingrid Logic is encountered, DO NOT attempt to argue with him/her. Scientists at MIT found in a 2006 study that Ingrid Logic is infallible. Interestingly enough, this is the same study that found the leading cause of brain aneurysms.
John: Dude, I'm so pissed.
Sam: Why? What's wrong?
John: Well, I got into an argument with Wheelchair Willy. I kept telling him that JFK was assassinated, but Willy insisted that he died in '89 of a heart attack.
Sam: Well? What happened?
John: Ingrid was walking by and overheard the argument. Once the Ingrid Logic kicked in, I knew I had lost the argument.
Sam: So what did you conclude?
John: JFK died in '89 of a heart attack.
Sam: Why? What's wrong?
John: Well, I got into an argument with Wheelchair Willy. I kept telling him that JFK was assassinated, but Willy insisted that he died in '89 of a heart attack.
Sam: Well? What happened?
John: Ingrid was walking by and overheard the argument. Once the Ingrid Logic kicked in, I knew I had lost the argument.
Sam: So what did you conclude?
John: JFK died in '89 of a heart attack.
by maxthndr September 21, 2008

by Anim0o February 9, 2020

noun.
The school of logic that compares and correlates two or more disparate, independent entities or events using absolutely no logic, usually based on superstition, WhatsApp forwards, hearsay and personally, socio-culturally preconceived notions. An utter disregard for basic science and lack of any empirically proven evidence is a key aspect of this school of thought. Usually deployed by Indian Gen X-1 to screw the living happiness of Gen X.
The school of logic that compares and correlates two or more disparate, independent entities or events using absolutely no logic, usually based on superstition, WhatsApp forwards, hearsay and personally, socio-culturally preconceived notions. An utter disregard for basic science and lack of any empirically proven evidence is a key aspect of this school of thought. Usually deployed by Indian Gen X-1 to screw the living happiness of Gen X.
Why can't I go swim?
Because Pluto is no longer a planet, and it messes up your birth-chart, swimming pools have piranha pee in them according to NASA and you didn't do what I asked you to do without explaining it because I am just generally superior to you in all regards. By the way, who swims on a rainy/sunny day?
That makes no sense. I can't argue with that. Fucking Logic of India!
Because Pluto is no longer a planet, and it messes up your birth-chart, swimming pools have piranha pee in them according to NASA and you didn't do what I asked you to do without explaining it because I am just generally superior to you in all regards. By the way, who swims on a rainy/sunny day?
That makes no sense. I can't argue with that. Fucking Logic of India!
by BuzzedBrain June 8, 2019

Potatoes grow on trees because potatoes are shaped like apples, which grow on trees. That's Nishy logic if I've ever heard any.
by TheGator-.- December 30, 2010
