Extremely hot very goonable historical figureš¤¤ i need that huge CAKE of hersšš„µš„µ
also she didnt say let them eat cake and she wasnt innocent or guilty (i have to add actually meaningful stuff here okay)
also she didnt say let them eat cake and she wasnt innocent or guilty (i have to add actually meaningful stuff here okay)
by Mangosigma67joemama January 2, 2026
Get the marie antoinette mug.Us<3. These two will be the best couple to ever live as well as the cutest and smartest and wonderfulest everything est. These two people are soul mates and will always love each other through the hardest of times. Monae is awesome and Antoine is the best. And that's on periodt.
by Lilx_j999 May 20, 2022
Get the Monae x Antoine mug.Related Words
antione • Antionette • Dirty Antionette • Antoine • Antonella • antiboner • Antoinette • Antigone • antonette • Antwone
A fallacy where someone focuses on the actions, behavior, or perceived motives of the person making an argument rather than engaging the argument's content. "Look what they did" becomes a way of dismissing what they say. The fallacy lies in treating action as evidence about truthāas if someone's behavior determines whether their claims are correct. But people can act badly and still speak truth; people can act virtuously and still be wrong. Argumentum Ad Actione is ad hominem applied to behavior rather than character, but it's still avoiding the content.
"She made excellent points about economic inequality. Response: 'But she drives an expensive carāshe's a hypocrite!' That's Argumentum Ad Actioneāfocusing on her actions, not her arguments. Maybe she's hypocritical; maybe not. Either way, her arguments about inequality stand or fall on their own. Actions don't refute claims; they just provide distraction."
by Abzugal February 28, 2026
Get the Argumentum Ad Actione mug.A hybrid fallacy common in political debates online where the focus shifts simultaneously to the argument's structure, the arguer's actions, and the arguer's personāall while avoiding the actual content. The classic form: "You're proving the point of this post by your very response!" The move claims that the way someone argues (structure), what they do (action), or who they are (person) actually demonstrates the truth of the opposing position. It's a triple evasionāstructure, action, and person all serve as distractions from content. The fallacy is particularly insidious because it feels cleverāas if you've caught someone in a performative contradictionābut it still doesn't engage what they actually said.
"I critiqued a political post. Response: 'Your angry response just proves the post right!' That's Argument Ad Structura-Actione-Hominemāusing my tone (action), my style (structure), and me (person) to dismiss my points without addressing them. Maybe I was angry; maybe my style was messy; maybe I'm flawed. None of that addresses whether my critique was valid. The move is clever evasion, not engagement."
by Abzugal February 28, 2026
Get the Argument Ad Structura-Actione-Hominem mug.A hybrid fallacy common in political debates online where the focus shifts simultaneously to the argument's structure, the arguer's actions, and the arguer's personāall while avoiding the actual content. The classic form: "You're proving the point of this post by your very response!" The move claims that the way someone argues (structure), what they do (action), or who they are (person) actually demonstrates the truth of the opposing position. It's a triple evasionāstructure, action, and person all serve as distractions from content. The fallacy is particularly insidious because it feels cleverāas if you've caught someone in a performative contradictionābut it still doesn't engage what they actually said.
"I critiqued a political post. Response: 'Your angry response just proves the post right!' That's Argumentum Ad Structura-Actione-Hominemāusing my tone (action), my style (structure), and me (person) to dismiss my points without addressing them. Maybe I was angry; maybe my style was messy; maybe I'm flawed. None of that addresses whether my critique was valid. The move is clever evasion, not engagement."
by Abzugal February 28, 2026
Get the Argumentum Ad Structura-Actione-Hominem mug.