It’s when you cum on your women’s chest who is fully Jewish and your fully German and you quickly cum on her chest and stomach and thrown in the over
Oh mein süßer kleiner Bagelschmelz *cums on chest and throws into oven* Geh in den Ofen, Süße
That’s the bagel melt technique
That’s the bagel melt technique
by Menace of your mind June 18, 2023
Get the Bagel melt technique mug.The evasive position for an organisation who's received a complaint.
The purpose of the hamper technique is to deliberately misinterpret a person's complaint in order to avoid acknowledging that something has gone wrong.
(Often used by companies, councils and government departments / services.)
The purpose of the hamper technique is to deliberately misinterpret a person's complaint in order to avoid acknowledging that something has gone wrong.
(Often used by companies, councils and government departments / services.)
1. I complained to the bicycle company because after I paid, they sent me a bike without peddles. They emailed straight back to say they were investigating my complaint that I had bought a banana from them and didn't like the taste. Two days later I got an "official" closed complaint letter which explained that they did not sell bananas so it they did not hold any responsibility for the taste of bananas. The Hamper Technique in Effect!
2. I contacted my local hospital for a copy of their complaints procedure after they stitched me back up with a pair of scissors left inside my stomach. Three weeks later, I was sent a summary of my complaint which stated that I'd complained about the number of stitches they used. (The Hamper Technique).
2. I contacted my local hospital for a copy of their complaints procedure after they stitched me back up with a pair of scissors left inside my stomach. Three weeks later, I was sent a summary of my complaint which stated that I'd complained about the number of stitches they used. (The Hamper Technique).
by Davina Los-Defino May 5, 2018
Get the The Hamper Technique mug.The act to intervene during a class with the only specific intention of filling up the time and avoid that the professor may be able to ask questions or change topic.
"Damn, we still have 45 minutes?!"
"Don't worry, I read a couple of papers vaguely connected to it, I'll use the Alawsi-Radice's technique"
"Don't worry, I read a couple of papers vaguely connected to it, I'll use the Alawsi-Radice's technique"
by HungerArchaeologist January 18, 2024
Get the Alawsi-Radice's technique mug.by Fast Spider May 31, 2024
Get the Spider Man Technique mug.by reaper_ February 2, 2024
Get the the squirrel technique mug.by Maginoff August 20, 2011
Get the Gerber Technique mug.A way to decide if a game reviewer actually takes time to play the game/plays the game they are reviewing. Here's an example:
1. Take the game called Shadow of War, it was a pretty famous triple A game but there was a lot of controversy surrounding it because of its microtransactions. Big reviewers that don't really care about gaming and don't review gamers properly (like Jim Sterling and Paragon) said the game was pay to win, even though it wasn't.
2. Find a reviewer you'd like to know if they are legit.
3. Watch their Shadow of War review
4. What did they say about the micro-transactions? In this example, you know that shadow of war isn't pay to win.
5. If they said it is pay to win, they obviously don't actually pay much attention to the game/ they never played the game and just copy and paste mix what other reviewers have said.
This is an easy and quick way to know if a reviewer is legit. It works with any game and any part or controversy surrounding it, the only two rules are:
1. This only works if you have played the game you're using this technique with and know what is wrong and what it is right.
2. The wrong side is the more famous and believed side by the community.
1. Take the game called Shadow of War, it was a pretty famous triple A game but there was a lot of controversy surrounding it because of its microtransactions. Big reviewers that don't really care about gaming and don't review gamers properly (like Jim Sterling and Paragon) said the game was pay to win, even though it wasn't.
2. Find a reviewer you'd like to know if they are legit.
3. Watch their Shadow of War review
4. What did they say about the micro-transactions? In this example, you know that shadow of war isn't pay to win.
5. If they said it is pay to win, they obviously don't actually pay much attention to the game/ they never played the game and just copy and paste mix what other reviewers have said.
This is an easy and quick way to know if a reviewer is legit. It works with any game and any part or controversy surrounding it, the only two rules are:
1. This only works if you have played the game you're using this technique with and know what is wrong and what it is right.
2. The wrong side is the more famous and believed side by the community.
1: Hey, I found this new youtube channel called Jim Sterling, he is fucking amazing at reviewing games.
2: Dude, have you even tried The Kaya-Technique? He said that Battlefront 2 still is pay to win even though they removed microtransactions a while ago.
2: Dude, have you even tried The Kaya-Technique? He said that Battlefront 2 still is pay to win even though they removed microtransactions a while ago.
by mystique777 May 27, 2018
Get the The Kaya-Technique mug.