by anonymous May 1, 2023
Get the Odesa's Earth Day Speechmug. A lot of sophisticated sounding words covering a flawed, irrational framework.
a particular variety of "begging the question" in which the very things the author criticizes, he also uses to support his own position.
Derived from Social Psychologist/Philosopher John Haidt's attacking arguments against Sam Harris, over Harris' $10,000 challenge for someone to provide a written argument compelling enough to change Harris' mind re: the central premise in the book, "The Moral Landscape."
Exemplified in this article: www.thisviewoflife.com/index.php/magazine/articles/why-sam-harris-is-unlikely-to-change-his-mind10
Haidt writes early on:
" Nobody has yet found a way to “debias” people—to train people to look for evidence on the other side—once emotions or self-interest are activated."
a particular variety of "begging the question" in which the very things the author criticizes, he also uses to support his own position.
Derived from Social Psychologist/Philosopher John Haidt's attacking arguments against Sam Harris, over Harris' $10,000 challenge for someone to provide a written argument compelling enough to change Harris' mind re: the central premise in the book, "The Moral Landscape."
Exemplified in this article: www.thisviewoflife.com/index.php/magazine/articles/why-sam-harris-is-unlikely-to-change-his-mind10
Haidt writes early on:
" Nobody has yet found a way to “debias” people—to train people to look for evidence on the other side—once emotions or self-interest are activated."
"Saying human reason is a failure in battling emotions... except when it isn't... is pure Haidt-speech."
Yet later, provides a direct counter example:
"This is why science works so well. Scientists suffer from the confirmation bias like everybody else, but the genius of science as an institution is that it incentivizes scientists to disconfirm each others’ ideas, and it creates a community within which a reasoned consensus eventually emerges."
Yet later, provides a direct counter example:
"This is why science works so well. Scientists suffer from the confirmation bias like everybody else, but the genius of science as an institution is that it incentivizes scientists to disconfirm each others’ ideas, and it creates a community within which a reasoned consensus eventually emerges."
by BeyondBelief February 11, 2014
Get the Haidt-speechmug. by Hehe369 February 10, 2020
Get the Keita’s Speechmug. Speech-to-Texas is a state in which you are talking with far too much "twang" and as a result , speech-to-text went full Texas on ya.
For example, if you say well that truck still tows more than the other truck, and speech-to-text types "Main that truck steel toes more!", You've just witnessed "Speech-to-Texas".
For example, if you say well that truck still tows more than the other truck, and speech-to-text types "Main that truck steel toes more!", You've just witnessed "Speech-to-Texas".
Yo man , you need to work on that twang , your speech to text is actin' up and went full bore "Speech-to-Texas".
by TexasTea123 October 10, 2022
Get the speech-to-texasmug. Steven likes the diagrams so... here’s a diagram:
Overarching framework where free
speech is a real thing
V
__________________________________
| The people who’s opinions are |
| allowed within the confines of |
| the overarching framework |
| where free speech is a thing |
|_________________________________|
This ☝️ is Jordan Peterson’s conceptualization of free speech.... There’s a lot to unpack here..... So... Let’s get to it!
How the “Postmodernists
conceptualize the box
(According to Dr. JeepJorp)
V
___________________________
| Group 1 Group 2 |
| Group 3 Group 4 |
| Et Cetra |
| __________________________|
I am here 👉😈👈 I’m what you
call an outside-the-box thinker
Overarching framework where free
speech is a real thing
V
__________________________________
| The people who’s opinions are |
| allowed within the confines of |
| the overarching framework |
| where free speech is a thing |
|_________________________________|
This ☝️ is Jordan Peterson’s conceptualization of free speech.... There’s a lot to unpack here..... So... Let’s get to it!
How the “Postmodernists
conceptualize the box
(According to Dr. JeepJorp)
V
___________________________
| Group 1 Group 2 |
| Group 3 Group 4 |
| Et Cetra |
| __________________________|
I am here 👉😈👈 I’m what you
call an outside-the-box thinker
Free Speech part 1
Hym “Now, the postmodernists don’t believe in autonomous individuals with thoughts and opinions. They believe that there are only groups vying for power. Jordan JeepJorpson believes that the individual is not ‘atomized’ and that ‘most people’ do not think (because they need to go through the institutions that cast him aside to be taught how to think ✋😒 but not how the institutions are currently teaching people to think because it’s too postmodernists and Marxist but instead how he thinks). INSTEAD, the individual is nested within a ‘Hierarchy of values.’ It looks like this:
____________________________
\Political/Religious engagement/
\Ascension economic of hierarchy /
\ Broader community /
\ Family unit /
\ Individual /
\————————————/
Hmmm... 🤔 Well now we need a name for this structure ... Hmmm... Let’s call this a.... Hmm... A grope? No... Graaawooooop... Grawoop? Grawoop! We’ll call it a grawoop! Now, if there is any dysfunction at any level of the grawoop, it is impossible for an individual to be sane. Therefore, you have a responsibility to become a part of one of these grawoops. Regardless of whether or not you believe in the ideas the grawoops espouse (because, who cares what you believe? Ammaright?) “
Hym “Now, the postmodernists don’t believe in autonomous individuals with thoughts and opinions. They believe that there are only groups vying for power. Jordan JeepJorpson believes that the individual is not ‘atomized’ and that ‘most people’ do not think (because they need to go through the institutions that cast him aside to be taught how to think ✋😒 but not how the institutions are currently teaching people to think because it’s too postmodernists and Marxist but instead how he thinks). INSTEAD, the individual is nested within a ‘Hierarchy of values.’ It looks like this:
____________________________
\Political/Religious engagement/
\Ascension economic of hierarchy /
\ Broader community /
\ Family unit /
\ Individual /
\————————————/
Hmmm... 🤔 Well now we need a name for this structure ... Hmmm... Let’s call this a.... Hmm... A grope? No... Graaawooooop... Grawoop? Grawoop! We’ll call it a grawoop! Now, if there is any dysfunction at any level of the grawoop, it is impossible for an individual to be sane. Therefore, you have a responsibility to become a part of one of these grawoops. Regardless of whether or not you believe in the ideas the grawoops espouse (because, who cares what you believe? Ammaright?) “
by Hym Iam November 16, 2022
Get the Free Speechmug. An euphemism which occurs if a woman is putting a guy in the friendzone, with other words this means that she doesn’t want to have neither relationship nor an intercourse with a man, but instead of telling him, the insulting and degrading “let s just be friends” she is using as an excuse, that in case of a relationship she is looking for the “wow” feeling that she unfortunately doesn’t seem to have with that certain guy, even though he is a very nice person.
Santos: You look so fabulous in the moonlight! Do you think we can move on,and spend this night together ? I have some champagne and strawberries in my fridge!
Lorena: I am really sorry, honestly,I like you you a lot,but I didn’t get the “wow feeling” and that is what I am looking for when I start a relationship with someone!
Santos: hmm..seems, that you have given me a wow speech..
Lorena: I am really sorry, honestly,I like you you a lot,but I didn’t get the “wow feeling” and that is what I am looking for when I start a relationship with someone!
Santos: hmm..seems, that you have given me a wow speech..
by Lolita67 October 16, 2012
Get the wow speechmug. by Kitten_Virus August 24, 2018
Get the Drunk speechmug.