Skip to main content

Eabling

An eabling is called a Newborn Eabo. (Plural: Eablings)
Random Hooman: *Hears crying echoes* WHAT IS THAT NOISE?
A girl: It's the cry of the eabling. They need their Eabo Parent...
by JelTheOCbase November 10, 2025
mugGet the Eabling mug.

Enabling Murder-Suicide

That's what the weaponized schizophrenia is doing by the way. If you can sue OpenAI for it, why can I not assert that it is the case that the weaponized schizophrenia does the exact same thing you are claiming the fucking AI does?
Hym "The 'weaponized schizophrenia' is, in fact, enabling murder-suicide as well. And if you would actually do an audit on when and where it has been happening and and you are doing that because you want it to negatively affect ME SPECIFICALLY before you do anything about it. You were lied to about what I was doing here and then you gave the liar the helm under the false pretense that what you are doing now does something other that prove my point or that it somehow invalidates any of the points I have made."
by Hym Iam December 13, 2025
mugGet the Enabling Murder-Suicide mug.

lip emailing

when you type an email with your lips
i love lip emailing my emails
by arthurlover March 1, 2017
mugGet the lip emailing mug.

second-generation enabling

Refers to either of two equally-unhealthy practices that seemingly "skips a place" in the chain of progression, but has a comparably-negative result --- Person A acts as a financial "crutch" for Person B, allowing Person B to continue his dissipative lifestyle:
(1) Where you do not beg resources directly (i.e., "first generation" enabling) from a financially-solvent person who is sick of your mooching, but you instead ask your "benefactor" to extend charity to your equally "spongy" offspring (i.e., you shamelessly take advantage of the person's "family man" nature by using the pathetically-manipulative "cute cherub-faced kiddos" or "they'll only be young once, so I wanna give them a decent childhood" pressure-excuse), or
(2) You don't request a certain amount of money --- say, twenty bucks --- from the disgruntled "provider" for "excessive/addictive/self-abusive" products (i.e., tobacco, alcohol, lottery tickets, unnecessary "pretty things", etc.) that he refuses to provide you with, but you instead ask him for that same twenty bucks to purchase "basic necessities" like simple groceries or household/repair products that he HAS agreed to help you out with obtaining... the catch, of course, is that you spend your OWN twenty bucks on those other unhealthy/senseless purchases instead of spending it on the healthful basics that your friend is giving you money for, and so in the end you are still getting him to make it possible for you to continue your unwise/unhealthy lifestyle.
Be wary of anyone who agreeably says, "Okay, fine --- I won't ask you for any more money for unhealthy stuff; I'll use my own funds for them. But please do give me some money for those "basic necessities" that you said you WOULD buy for me." Well, don't you see --- that's really the same destructive deal when all's said and done --- oh, sure, the person may indeed not be "directly" asking you to buy him cigarettes, but the person is merely using the last of his **own** money for them, and then asking you for money to buy the groceries that he himself could have purchased if he hadn't spent his last dollar on coffin-nails! It doesn't really matter where your added funds are "injected:" into the person's budget --- it's still just second-generation enabling!
by QuacksO June 8, 2018
mugGet the second-generation enabling mug.

Share this definition

Sign in to vote

We'll email you a link to sign in instantly.

Or

Check your email

We sent a link to

Open your email