A wiki, very similar to wikipedia on everything. However..i have noticed many hypocrisies and hmm, well crackpot theories.
The hypocrisy which pisses me off most is that in the "Examples of Bias in wikipedia" article http://www.conservapedia.com/Examples_of_Bias_in_Wikipedia)
number 22. (out of 133 ffs)reads:
"Wikipedia has an extensive entry on "Creation myth".40 Describing Creationism as a "myth" is yet another attempt to disparage Christians, and although the theory of evolution satisfies Wikipedia's definition of "myth", Wikipedia never describes it as a "myth". "
Fair enough, slightly mental, but he has a point...yes?
However...looking at the article on the conservapedia article "Dreamtime", an australlian aboriginal creation story; IT is described as a myth.
So Christian creationism is NOT a myth but any other creationism is?? hmmm...
also on the article about kangaroos (boing boing) there is a large 3 paragraph section on the Young Earth Creationist theory and only 1/2 a sentence on the evolutionary theory
so the YEC theory which is probably less supported than evolution recieves more coverage than a well established and most probably correct theory.
The hypocrisy which pisses me off most is that in the "Examples of Bias in wikipedia" article http://www.conservapedia.com/Examples_of_Bias_in_Wikipedia)
number 22. (out of 133 ffs)reads:
"Wikipedia has an extensive entry on "Creation myth".40 Describing Creationism as a "myth" is yet another attempt to disparage Christians, and although the theory of evolution satisfies Wikipedia's definition of "myth", Wikipedia never describes it as a "myth". "
Fair enough, slightly mental, but he has a point...yes?
However...looking at the article on the conservapedia article "Dreamtime", an australlian aboriginal creation story; IT is described as a myth.
So Christian creationism is NOT a myth but any other creationism is?? hmmm...
also on the article about kangaroos (boing boing) there is a large 3 paragraph section on the Young Earth Creationist theory and only 1/2 a sentence on the evolutionary theory
so the YEC theory which is probably less supported than evolution recieves more coverage than a well established and most probably correct theory.
Conservapedia on Wikipedia: "Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia founded by entrepreneur and atheist Jimmy Wales..."
umm yehh..why mention atheism?
umm yehh..why mention atheism?
by A REAL WORLD PERSON October 6, 2008
Get the conservapedia mug.A conservative that constantly shows to be a utter and complete asshole and denier of such obvious facts to push their agenda. A common antonym to the word is the world famous Libtard.
John: Global Warming is just a Chinese conspiracy to discredit the US.
Ricky: John you are such a Conservicunt.
Ricky: John you are such a Conservicunt.
by The Original Argoniphile June 27, 2018
Get the Conservicunt mug.Related Words
by chapter4 June 21, 2008
Get the conservapedia.com mug.A blind conservative follower who spews “alternative news” that they get from bloggers, podcasts, conspiracists, political commentators, and the opinion section in the paper.
by Saladtosser6969 January 1, 2018
Get the Conservacuck mug.Far right pundits like Rush Limbaugh, attempt to speak from a position of Moral authority while their lifestyles fly in the face of these supposed beliefs; this is a clear example of Conservachism!
by CultrWar July 12, 2010
Get the conservachism mug.by Anonynono March 26, 2016
Get the conservacunt mug.Hunter called that moderate kid a libtard for not worshipping Trump, what a conservitard.
Why are boomers such conservitards?
Why are boomers such conservitards?
by MYNAMEISJOHNCENA June 23, 2020
Get the Conservitard mug.