by Kristian Aitken July 2, 2003
Get the battered mug.Pertaining to the theoretical world of sexual bases; batters box refers to the pre-first base status of no titillating action.
by Jesse M. Garcia August 23, 2008
Get the batters box mug.Related Words
bitters
• bittersweet
• bitte
• Bittens
• bitter betty
• bitter blue
• Bitter Coleslaw
• bitterman
• bitterness
• bittel
by erin piner April 28, 2008
Get the ding batter mug.The condition whereby one experiences massive gastrointestinal explosions of gas and liqui-shit after consuming too much food from Taco Bell.
John made a run for the border with a late night Taco Bell visit. He paid the price the next day when the 4 bean burritos he ate came back out as Border Batter.
by Eaton Holgoode June 10, 2009
Get the Border Batter mug.Used to be a slogan for DuPont (a chemical company), but now it refers to the practice of taking medication and/or drugs to make your life more enjoyable.
Becky: "Wow, Jenny was always so depressed, but now she takes a bottle of Prozac in the morning and washes it down with vodka, she seems really relaxed and happy."
Hank: "Oh, so she's discovered better living through chemistry!"
or
Slut: "Wow, your schlong is so hard!"
Old guy: "Yeah, I used to be impotent, but now I take Viagra. It's better living through chemistry..."
Hank: "Oh, so she's discovered better living through chemistry!"
or
Slut: "Wow, your schlong is so hard!"
Old guy: "Yeah, I used to be impotent, but now I take Viagra. It's better living through chemistry..."
by jdawgzzz January 24, 2010
Get the better living through chemistry mug.BatteryIncluded and Apokryltaros (also known as Mr.Fink) are two atheist users on Wikipedia. They are self-professed scientists but with no qualifications, they are men who are ardent and delusional anti-theists with an inexplicable hatred towards religion and God (who they claim not to believe in so their hatred for him is illogical).
Both users stalk a certain selection of articles on Wikipedia (mainly the abiogenesis article) which they defend with aggressiveness and the view that their opinions and only their opinions are right. Both users are completely narrow minded and against views that disagree with their delusional beliefs.
For a self-professed biologist, BatteryIncluded doesn't understand the difference between abiogenesis and evolution. Abiogenesis is a hypothesis that attempts to explain how life may have arose from non-living chemicals. Evolution is a scientific theory which explains how life evolved and the variation of species because of it. A person can hold evolution to be true but abiogenesis to be false. Honest researchers do not accept abiogenesis as factual because, unlike evolution, it has never been observed and has no empirical evidence. From a scientific perceptive, the actual origin of life remains a mystery still. The answer to the origins of life could very well be abiogenesis though and contrary to the views of BatteryIncluded, Apokryltaros and other extremist atheists, this doesn't refute God.
Both users stalk a certain selection of articles on Wikipedia (mainly the abiogenesis article) which they defend with aggressiveness and the view that their opinions and only their opinions are right. Both users are completely narrow minded and against views that disagree with their delusional beliefs.
For a self-professed biologist, BatteryIncluded doesn't understand the difference between abiogenesis and evolution. Abiogenesis is a hypothesis that attempts to explain how life may have arose from non-living chemicals. Evolution is a scientific theory which explains how life evolved and the variation of species because of it. A person can hold evolution to be true but abiogenesis to be false. Honest researchers do not accept abiogenesis as factual because, unlike evolution, it has never been observed and has no empirical evidence. From a scientific perceptive, the actual origin of life remains a mystery still. The answer to the origins of life could very well be abiogenesis though and contrary to the views of BatteryIncluded, Apokryltaros and other extremist atheists, this doesn't refute God.
No natural process in existence refutes the concept of God since natural processes merely explain "how" and not "where" all matter and energy came from. Of course BatteryIncluded and Apokryltaros get really really mad should you ask them to demonstrate their blind faith in the hypothetical magical atheist idea that universes can arise from nothing out of singularities that appear from nothing since it's evidenceless.
The Big Bang theory has presented a huge obstacle for these fools as it states the universe had a beginning. The two answers to its beginning is that it either arose from nothing (which is contrary to the principle of causality) or that it came from an unmoved eternal prime mover, i.e a god. So far, atheists have been unable to demonstrate or prove something from nothing and therefore their philosophy remains dead.
BatteryIncluded and Apokryltaros are examples of Wikipedians who use their editing privileges to censor other viewpoints and bully and harass users. They are quite often psychotic with their gibberish and are quite clearly giving out blow jobs to admins so that they don't get banned even when abusing the system of Wikipedia by closing talk page subjects as "soapboxes" whenever someone comes in and refutes their magical atheist belief that matter and energy can just "pop" into existence from nothing.
The Big Bang theory has presented a huge obstacle for these fools as it states the universe had a beginning. The two answers to its beginning is that it either arose from nothing (which is contrary to the principle of causality) or that it came from an unmoved eternal prime mover, i.e a god. So far, atheists have been unable to demonstrate or prove something from nothing and therefore their philosophy remains dead.
BatteryIncluded and Apokryltaros are examples of Wikipedians who use their editing privileges to censor other viewpoints and bully and harass users. They are quite often psychotic with their gibberish and are quite clearly giving out blow jobs to admins so that they don't get banned even when abusing the system of Wikipedia by closing talk page subjects as "soapboxes" whenever someone comes in and refutes their magical atheist belief that matter and energy can just "pop" into existence from nothing.
by Silly Atheists October 26, 2014
Get the BatteryIncluded and Apokryltaros mug.by Burritowagon May 11, 2010
Get the Baby Batter Blaster mug.