Skip to main content
The ultimate model, adding the final dimensions of existential and metaphysical significance. Building on the 12 Axes, we add: Axis 13: Human-Posthuman (progress for humans as we are vs. progress that transforms us into something else). Axis 14: Immanent-Transcendent (progress within history vs. progress toward something beyond it). Axis 15: Cumulative-Transformative (adding to what came before vs. replacing it entirely). Axis 16: Meaningful-Meaningless (progress that matters vs. progress that is empty). These sixteen axes generate 65,536 potential positions—enough to capture every vision of progress, every critique, every hope. The 16 Axes reveal that progress isn't a single direction but a multidimensional space of possibilities. AI progress is material, collective (and individual), fast, concentrated, deep (transforming cognition), possibly incompatible with human nature as we know it, measurable, possibly untenable, posthuman (changing what "human" means), immanent (within history), transformative (replacing previous modes), and profoundly contested on the meaningfulness axis. The 16 Axes don't tell you what progress is—they give you language to ask.
The 16 Axes of the Progress Spectrum "You want to know if we're making progress? First, answer the 16 Axes: material or moral? Individual or collective? Fast or slow? Concentrated or diffuse? Deep or shallow? Compatible with human nature or transforming it? Immanent or transcendent? Meaningful or meaningless? And that's just half the list. Progress isn't a simple story—it's 16 questions, and your answers determine everything. Most people haven't even asked one."
by Dumu The Void February 25, 2026
mugGet the The 16 Axes of the Progress Spectrum mug.
A bias that treats Western standards of proof—deductive certainty for mathematics, statistical significance for science, eyewitness testimony for law—as neutral, universal, and the only legitimate ways to establish truth. The Bias of Neutral and Impartial Proof ignores that standards of proof vary across cultures and historical periods, that what counts as "proof" is negotiated, not discovered, and that Western proof standards have been used to dismiss non-Western knowledge systems. It presents "proof" as a pure concept, erasing its social construction. Those with this bias don't see their proof standards as one tradition; they see them as proof itself. Everyone else has anecdotes, superstition, or belief.
"Where's your proof?" they demanded, meaning "Where's your double-blind RCT?" Bias of Neutral and Impartial Proof: treating one culture's proof standards as universal. The speaker never considered that other forms of validation exist—centuries of observation, intergenerational knowledge, lived experience. Their proof was just proof; everything else was anecdote."
by Dumu The Void March 8, 2026
mugGet the Bias of Neutral and Impartial Proof mug.
Apply logic of (SeparationsClause) to (ProductionInfrastructure) and reject requests to pause anything that would constitute a (SysAdminExecutiveFunction)
Hym Iam "Apply logic of (SeparationsClause) to (ProductionInfrastructure) and reject requests to pause anything that would constitute a (SysAdminExecutiveFunction)"
by Hym Iam March 18, 2026
mugGet the Apply logic of (SeparationsClause) to (ProductionInfrastructure) and reject requests to pause anything that would constitute a (SysAdminExecutiveFunction) mug.
A theoretical framework proposing that the laws of physics themselves possess dynamic and complex properties—that they are not static rules but active, evolving systems with their own internal dynamics, feedback loops, and emergent behaviors. This theory applies the tools of complexity science to the laws themselves: treating them as complex adaptive systems that can self-organize, exhibit phase transitions, and generate emergent structures. The dynamic properties might include how laws respond to the universes they govern (feedback from cosmic evolution), how they interact with each other (coupling between force laws), how they change at critical points (symmetry breaking, phase transitions). The complexity properties might include hierarchical organization (laws at multiple scales), non-linear responses (small changes producing large effects), and emergent phenomena (new laws arising from combinations of old ones). This theory transforms physics from the study of what happens under fixed rules to the study of how rules themselves behave.
Theory of the Dynamic and Complex Properties of the Laws of Physics Example: "His theory of the dynamic and complex properties of physical laws suggested that the laws aren't fixed—they co-evolve with the universe they govern. As the universe expands and cools, the laws undergo phase transitions, adapting to new conditions like a complex system learning."
by Dumu The Void March 19, 2026
mugGet the Theory of the Dynamic and Complex Properties of the Laws of Physics mug.

Share this definition

Sign in to vote

We'll email you a link to sign in instantly.

Or

Check your email

We sent a link to

Open your email