When you open a post on twitter that's labeled as "Sensitive Content", It can be considered any image or video before being opened, based on a random technological event in the twitter servers. It has an ever-changing RNG chance of being any image or video, from Smash Bros. gameplay to pornography to high quality angry birds.
I took my chances with the Schrödinger's Twitter Content Button and I got a video of a dude being sliced.
by Combo_42 November 20, 2021
A person that is frequently told jokes and then decides if they are offensive depending on how much they like the person that said it
Boy 1: women belong in the kitchen lol
Schrödinger’s Social Justice Warrior: omg that’s so funny haha
***
Boy 2: women belong in the kitchen lol
Schrödinger’s Social Justice Warrior: that’s so sexist, Ryan
Schrödinger’s Social Justice Warrior: omg that’s so funny haha
***
Boy 2: women belong in the kitchen lol
Schrödinger’s Social Justice Warrior: that’s so sexist, Ryan
by Louise Paige March 23, 2020
When you make an Argument but information contained within said argument is Unconfirmed by the creators of the topic.
Guy 1: "IT'S A GIRL"
Guy 2: "NO IT'S A GUY YOU FUCKFACE"
Both Guy 1 and 2: *Incoherent yelling and Swearing*
Guy 3: "What are they arguing about?"
Guy 4: "Whether the Cat Human thing in a new anime is a guy or girl"
Guy 5: "A real Schrödinger's Argument, eh"
Guy 2: "NO IT'S A GUY YOU FUCKFACE"
Both Guy 1 and 2: *Incoherent yelling and Swearing*
Guy 3: "What are they arguing about?"
Guy 4: "Whether the Cat Human thing in a new anime is a guy or girl"
Guy 5: "A real Schrödinger's Argument, eh"
by N.A.R.B. Enthusiast November 27, 2021
Schrödinger's Mark is a situation that refers to a student who feels a lack of confidence, such that they are too ashamed to check their mark; choosing instead to live in a state of artificial emotional neutrality - thinking that their mark is both good and bad - as opposed to taking a gamble and having their next few days be either miserable or joyful.
This is similar to the quantum-physics theory known as Schrödinger's cat, whereby until the box is opened (or, in this case, when the student checks their mark); it is not known whether or not the cat is alive or dead - or, in this case, whether or not the mark is one which the student would be happy or unhappy with.
To conclude, by choosing not to check what mark was achieved, the student can live in the aforementioned state of ignorant emotional neutrality.
This is similar to the quantum-physics theory known as Schrödinger's cat, whereby until the box is opened (or, in this case, when the student checks their mark); it is not known whether or not the cat is alive or dead - or, in this case, whether or not the mark is one which the student would be happy or unhappy with.
To conclude, by choosing not to check what mark was achieved, the student can live in the aforementioned state of ignorant emotional neutrality.
Student 1: "Shit man, I don't think I did too well on that test"
Student 2: "Damn, you gonna check your mark?"
Student 1: "Nah bro, no way. I don't want my day ruined. Even if I somehow did well, I don't want to take that chance"
Student 2: "Well shit, real Schrödinger's Mark situation, ain't it?"
Student 2: "Damn, you gonna check your mark?"
Student 1: "Nah bro, no way. I don't want my day ruined. Even if I somehow did well, I don't want to take that chance"
Student 2: "Well shit, real Schrödinger's Mark situation, ain't it?"
by dumberthanithink March 18, 2023
A piece of media—such as a movie, book, television series, or video game—characterized by such poor quality or ambiguous tone that it is difficult to discern whether it was created as a serious work or intended as a parody.
"I couldn't tell if that movie was meant to be a serious thriller or a spoof—it’s total Schrödinger's Garbage. Every scene leaves you wondering if the bad acting and bizarre plot twists were intentional or just a sign of terrible filmmaking."
by normalmaximo November 10, 2024
A fake player that plays and doesn’t know they’re in the game, but simultaneously plays so badly that they believe they’re the one being played by other people. They are playing and don’t understand the game.
Person 1: “He says they had joke sex and it was just a joke and he doesn’t see why they think they’re anything but friends.”
Person 2: “He’s Schrödinger’s player.”
Person 2: “He’s Schrödinger’s player.”
by Freddie Freaker April 18, 2023
A Schrödinger is someone who decides what they meant by something only after seeing the reaction to it. A good example of this is Schrödinger's Douchebag, which is commonly defined as "Someone who says something bad, and decides weather or not it was a joke after seeing the reaction to it." Another example is someone who sends a risky text and says they accidentally sent it to the wrong person if the reaction to the text is negative.
Person One: This person asked me out and said it was a dare when I rejected them.
Person Two: That definitely wasn't a dare, they were just being a Schrödinger.
Person Two: That definitely wasn't a dare, they were just being a Schrödinger.
by Sir_Platypus_VII December 11, 2023