Angel Jose Robles `~`AndA`~` Aubrey Drake Graham Are Related

Angel Jose Robles `~`AndA`~` Aubrey Drake Graham Are Related

Angel Jose Robles `~`AndA`~` Aubrey Drake Graham Are Related

by Angel234IsTheDarkSeraphim April 17, 2025

GANBJrALE RELATED

Maclonnbeveli and rELBJRALOODS in red 🔴 AND BLUE UNITY RELBJRALUDS in blue
💙 doubjrags 🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉.by lbj as in Lonnie benningfield junior. Banging backwards fights. Hitting it from the back. By lbj as in Lonnie benningfield junior.

I invented and made and created ganBJrale related fights.by lbj as in Lonnie benningfield junior.

by Lonnie Benningfield juniorshaq May 26, 2021

Ice relations

Vampire sex, since vampires are cold in most medias, but this specifically refers to twilight vampires.

This phrase originated from a TikTok that was also posted to the “Twilight Shitposting” Facebook group, in which the video referred to the fictional scenario of Edward & Bella pushing Renaldo off them to have the ability to have more “ice relations”.

I wanna have ice relations with a sexy fruity lunatic vampire boy

by Superjuliam March 17, 2023

relatable-bait

a term used to describe something relatable as a bait for views or internet points.

Dave: "Hey Jon, why is this video the same punchline over and over again? Isn't it supposed to be relatable?"
Jon: "No, he's using relatability for bait, it's relatable-bait, Dave."

by FancyPhobia February 28, 2024

osamu relator

An osamu relator is someone who actually kins dazai osamu for relating to the character *not for his tendencies* and the word means you actually watched the show and agree that you relate to the character and we say *osamu relator* instead of dazai kinnie because the word dazai kinnie is currently being taken over by people who don't whatch bungo stray dogs or just don't relate to the chratacter.

"Yes, Ash is an osamu relator because they act and relate to dazai osamu."

by Actual osamu relator March 26, 2021

Race relations

Race relations seemed better and less divided a few years ago, back when the Confederate statues were still around. At least back then, even if they argued at times, they were still talking points. Now that the statues aren't there people are expected to forget history, change, and compromise. That won't make anything better. Before the statues were removed people said they were divisive, but race relations seemed to do well. Now that they've been removed, people really are more divided.

Race relations don't improve if people don't get to discuss history from all angles, even the unpopular (unprofitable) ones. As long as one group wants another group to change, forget, or compromise, things aren't going to get better, they're going to keep getting worse. Sometimes (actually many times throughout history) things were already as good as they were going to get, then people were people (doing anything to get what they want, as people do), and they still wanted change, and they thought they could do better, and they all fucked it all up. They were all part of the problem, since everyone is.

by Solid Mantis November 11, 2020

not related

-Collateral relative's spouse's ascendant
-Collateral relative's spouse's collateral relative
-Descendant-in-law's ascendant (except: child-in-law's parent = co-parent-in-law)
-Descendant-in-law's collateral relative
-Spouse's collateral relative's spouse's ascendant
-Spouse's collateral relative's spouse's collateral relative
-Stepdescendant-in-law's ascendant (except: stepchild-in-law's parent = step-co-parent-in-law)
-Stepdescendant-in-law's collateral relative
-Collateral relative's spouse's stepascendant
-Collateral relative's spouse's collateral relative's spouse
-Descendant-in-law's stepascendant (except: child-in-law's stepparent = step-co-parent-in-law)
-Descendant-in-law's collateral relative's spouse
-Spouse's collateral relative's spouse's stepascendant
-Spouse's collateral relative's spouse's collateral relative's spouse
-Stepdescendant-in-law's stepascendant
-Stepdescendant-in-law's collateral relative's spouse
-Relative's widowed (non biological)'s new spouse
-Relative's widowed (non biological)'s new spouse's relative
-Relative's widowed (non biological)'s new spouse's relative's spouse
-Spouse's relative's widowed (non biological)'s new spouse
-Spouse's relative's widowed (non biological)'s new spouse's relative
-Spouse's relative's widowed (non biological)'s new spouse's relative's spouse
-Absence of any kinship (nor biological, nor by affinity, nor by indefinite classification, nor by adoption)

Not related.

by Willez May 24, 2023