Nonsensical, uncited, or otherwise incomplete arguments may be immediately recognized as trolls if the first party immediately responds with "Fucking Google It" when further explanation is requested. It can safely be assumed the first party doesn't know what they're talking about and Rule 14 may be invoked.
P1: Can someone explain to me, without sensationalism, why this bailout is bad for America?
P2: Try going into a convenient store with the money from your monopoly set. Does it work? No. Now, pretend China is the convenient store.
P1: I'm not following your analogy. China actually does take our money. And how does that explain the bailout?
An addition to Rule 36, this rule states that, if there is a fetish for anything, then therefore anything must be porn, at least to someone. To simplify: It is not necessary for a subject to contain sexual content in order to be classified as "porn", according to Rule 36. To simplify further: Everything is porn.
Person 1: Man, the internet is crazy. I bet there's even Holocaust porn out there.
Person 2: To someone, the Holocaust already is porn.