Mihai Doncu's relatives

Mihai Doncu's relatives are a powerful romanian gang that can fuck you up immediately.

When you work on your badly engineered car and you get angry you can say: "Mihai Doncu's relatives fuck that."

by Gobi1 December 20, 2023

Theory of Relative Disautonomy

The idea that an individual, organization, or state possesses a limited degree of freedom, but this freedom is always conditional and exists within a web of external constraints, dependencies, and coercive influences. You have the illusion of choice, but your options are pre-filtered by larger systems (economic, political, algorithmic). It's autonomy with an asterisk—you can steer, but the road, the map, and the destination are largely determined by forces beyond your control. Your "free will" is exercised within a heavily patrolled playground.

Theory of Relative Disautonomy Example: A social media influencer has Relative Disautonomy. They can choose what brand to promote or what political take to voice, but their entire livelihood depends on an algorithm's favor, advertiser sentiment, and platform rules that can change overnight. They are free to dance, but only on a platform owned by someone else, who can pull the trapdoor at any time.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 3, 2026

Theory of Relative Placebo

The observation that the efficacy of a placebo (or belief-based effect) is not absolute but depends on cultural context, presentation, and societal authority. A sugar pill presented by a doctor in a white coat with a high price tag in a rich nation has a stronger "relative placebo" effect than the same pill given casually in a different setting. The theory extends to social policies and ideologies.

Theory of Relative Placebo Example: A prestigious consulting firm sells a corporate "wellness program" (mandatory mindfulness, step counters) that reduces burnout symptoms in the short term, not by changing workloads, but through the relative placebo effect of making employees feel cared for. The same program in a struggling non-profit would have little effect because the authority and "potency" of the placebo are weaker.

by Dumu The Void February 9, 2026

Law of Absolute and Relative Truth

The principle that truth operates in two modes simultaneously: absolute truth (true for everyone, everywhere, always) and relative truth (true within a context, for a particular observer, under specific conditions). The law acknowledges that some truths are universal—2+2=4, water freezes at 0°C at sea level—while others depend on perspective—"this room is cold" is true for some, false for others. Problems arise when people insist that all truth is absolute (denying perspective) or that all truth is relative (denying reality). The law of absolute and relative truth reconciles these positions by recognizing that truth has both dimensions, and wisdom lies in knowing which applies when.

Example: "They argued about whether the movie was good. He insisted it was objectively terrible (absolute truth). She said it was good for her (relative truth). The law of absolute and relative truth said they were both right—absolute truth about the movie's technical merits (which were measurable), relative truth about their enjoyment (which was personal). They agreed to disagree, which is what the law recommends."

by Abzugal February 16, 2026

Law of Absolute and Relative Logical Validity

The principle that logical validity operates in two modes: absolute validity (an argument that is valid in all logical systems, by any reasonable standard) and relative validity (an argument that is valid within a particular logical framework but may not hold in others). The law acknowledges that some arguments are universally valid—if all humans are mortal and Socrates is human, then Socrates is mortal holds in any logic that includes those rules. Other arguments are valid only within specific systems—a proof that works in classical logic may fail in paraconsistent logic. The law of absolute and relative validity reconciles these by recognizing that validity has both universal and context-dependent dimensions.

Law of Absolute and Relative Logical Validity Example: "They debated whether his argument was valid. He insisted it was absolutely valid (true in any logic). She pointed out it relied on the law of excluded middle, which doesn't hold in intuitionistic logic. The law of absolute and relative validity said: valid in classical logic (relative validity), not universally valid (absolute validity failed). Both were right, which is why logic is complicated."

by Abzugal February 16, 2026

Law of Absolute and Relative Logical Fallacies

The principle that fallacies operate in two modes: absolute fallacies (errors that are fallacious in all logical systems, by any reasonable standard) and relative fallacies (errors that are fallacious in some systems but may be acceptable in others). The law acknowledges that some errors are universally wrong—affirming the consequent is a mistake in any logic that cares about validity. Other errors are system-dependent—what counts as a fallacy in formal logic may be perfectly acceptable in rhetorical argument. The law of absolute and relative fallacies reconciles these by recognizing that fallaciousness has both universal and context-dependent dimensions.

Law of Absolute and Relative Logical Fallacies Example: "He accused her of ad hominem, claiming it was an absolute fallacy. She pointed out that in political debate, attacking character is sometimes relevant and not always fallacious. The law of absolute and relative fallacies said: in formal logic, absolutely fallacious; in political rhetoric, context-dependent. Both were right, which is why fallacies are complicated."

by Abzugal February 16, 2026

Law of Absolute and Relative Logical Systems

The principle that logical systems themselves operate in two modes: absolute logic (the hypothetical set of rules that would be valid for all reasoning beings, everywhere, always) and relative logics (the actual systems humans use, which vary across cultures, eras, and purposes). The law acknowledges that there may be universal logical principles—the laws of thought that any rational being must follow—but that our access to them is always mediated through particular systems that are relative to our context. The law of absolute and relative logical systems reconciles the universalist claim that logic is one with the pluralist observation that logics are many.

Law of Absolute and Relative Logical Systems Example: "They debated whether logic was universal or culturally constructed. He argued for absolute logic—one true system for all. She argued for relative logics—different cultures, different rules. The law of absolute and relative logical systems said: there may be absolute logic in theory, but we only ever encounter relative logics in practice. They agreed to keep studying, which is what philosophers do."

by Abzugal February 16, 2026