Theory of Social Control of Society

A meta-concept examining how society as a whole engages in the process of controlling itself. It looks at the decentralized, self-reinforcing network where institutions (media, schools), groups (peers, families), and individuals all participate in enforcing norms, often without central coordination, creating a stable but often coercive equilibrium.

Theory of Social Control of Society Example: The viral "cancel culture" mob. No government directs it. Instead, society itself acts as a control mechanism: through social media, peers enforce norms by collectively shaming, shunning, and applying economic pressure (getting someone fired) for perceived transgressions. It’s a decentralized but powerful form of societal self-policing that reinforces current moral boundaries.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 7, 2026

Theory of Scientific Social Control

Analyzes how the authority of "Science" (as a cultural institution, not just the method) is invoked to legitimize and operationalize control. It involves using scientific language, research, and experts to justify social policies, pathologize dissent, and define what is "normal" or "optimal" human behavior, often obscuring ethical or political choices.

Theory of Scientific Social Control Example: Corporations using "productivity science" and "optimization studies" to justify constant employee monitoring software. They don't say "we don't trust you"; they say "data shows this maximizes efficiency." The authority of science legitimizes invasive control, framing it as a neutral, objective necessity rather than a power move to manage worker behavior.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 7, 2026

Theory of Technological Social Control

Examines how the very design and infrastructure of technology inherently regulate human action. It’s not just about using tech to surveil; it’s about how platforms, algorithms, and physical devices create environments that make some behaviors easier and others impossible, automating control into the system's architecture.

Theory of Technological Social Control Examines how the very design and infrastructure of technology inherently regulate human action. It’s not just about using tech to surveil; it’s about how platforms, algorithms, and physical devices create environments that make some behaviors easier and others impossible, automating control into the system's architecture.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 7, 2026

Logical Hyperrealism Theory

A metalogic fallacy where the map declares itself superior to the territory. It's the belief that abstract logical systems exist in a pristine, perfect realm above the messy physical world, and that this "pure logic" should dictate all human affairs. Adherents treat formal reasoning as a supreme authority, dismissing material constraints, emotional context, and lived experience as irrelevant "noise." In this view, if something is logically sound in theory, it must be imposed in practice, regardless of human cost. It's the ideology of the unfeeling algorithm pretending to be a god.

Logical Hyperrealism Theory Example: A city planner, armed with perfect traffic-flow models, insists on demolishing a historic neighborhood because the logic of his simulation demands a straight, optimal highway. He dismisses residents' protests about community, heritage, and displacement as "illogical sentiment." The hyperreal logic on his screen becomes more "real" and authoritative than the physical and social world it destroys.

by Dumu The Void February 7, 2026

Barnum-Forer Logic Theory

A metalogic fallacy named after the Barnum-Forer effect (where people accept vague, generic statements as personally accurate). It applies this to reasoning: using broad, unfalsifiable logical claims that sound profound but are essentially meaningless or applicable to anything. The logic is so vague it can be stretched to "prove" any pre-existing bias, providing a facade of rationality without substantive rigor. It’s the intellectual equivalent of a fortune cookie.

Barnum-Forer Logic Theory Example: In an online debate about politics, someone argues, "Well, logically, the optimal system is one that balances order and freedom." This statement is unimpeachably vague—no one is for imbalance—and can be used to justify fascism or anarchism. It sounds logical, but it's an empty container filled with whatever the speaker already believes, providing a false sense of rational justification.

by Dumu The Void February 7, 2026

Dissociated Logic Theory

Dissociated Logic Theory A metalogic fallacy where logic is seen as a disembodied, contextless set of rules that exists independently of the humans who create and use it. This dissociated logic is then treated as a universal referee, incapable of accommodating diverse perspectives, cultural differences, or legitimate disagreements. It assumes there is only One True Logical Path, branding any deviation as "irrationality" or "error." It denies the inherently social and situated nature of reasoning.

Dissociated Logic Theory Example: During a team conflict, one member insists, "There's only one logical way to solve this problem," and presents a single, rigid flowchart. They dismiss alternative solutions from colleagues as "emotional" or "confused," unable to recognize that different lived experiences and professional backgrounds might lead to other, equally valid logical frameworks. The dissociated logic becomes a tool for intellectual domination.

by Dumu The Void February 7, 2026

Theory of Scientific Disputes

This theory frames conflicts in science not merely as searches for truth, but as strategic battles for legitimacy, authority, and resources. It examines how scientific disagreements are often shaped by competing paradigms, institutional loyalties, career ambitions, and access to funding, rather than purely by evidence. The "winner" shapes the dominant narrative.

Theory of Scientific Disputes Example: The fierce debate over the definition of a "planet" that led to Pluto's demotion. This wasn't just about icy rocks. It was a dispute between planetary scientists (who favored a broader definition) and dynamicists (who favored orbital characteristics). The struggle was over who gets to classify celestial bodies, control textbooks, and steer future research missions—a power struggle dressed in technical terms.

by Dumu The Void February 7, 2026