Person 1: You're so lame
Person 2: Pop pop sock meme review and I like to poo
Person 1: Nvm your the ultimate chad
Person 2: Pop pop sock meme review and I like to poo
Person 1: Nvm your the ultimate chad
by FJlkasdfj February 26, 2019
"Thanks! We've sent you an email, but we need to make sure your email works. Click the link in your email and your entry will be reviewed soon."
Oh.
Oh.
by Thanks! We've sent you an em April 04, 2013
Write for a large audience. Lots of people will read this, so give some background information.
Don't name your friends. We'll reject inside jokes and definitions naming non-celebrities.
In the boxes below, link to other words with square brackets. For example, booty will become booty.
Don't name your friends. We'll reject inside jokes and definitions naming non-celebrities.
In the boxes below, link to other words with square brackets. For example, booty will become booty.
All the definitions on Urban Dictionary were written by people just like you. Now's your chance to add your own! Please review Urban Dictionary's content guidelines before writing your definition.
by SolarRad75 June 09, 2020
Please review Urban Dictionary's content guidelines before writing your definition. Here's the short version: Share definitions that other people will find meaningful and never post hate speech or people’s personal information.
by PenguinedPsyduck0xq0 March 12, 2021
Urban dictionary: Please review Urban Dictionary's content guidelines before writing your definition. Here's the short version: Share definitions that other people will find meaningful and never post hate speech or people’s personal information.
users: ok
users: ok
by dry water 69 March 29, 2022
Urban Dictionary: Please review Urban Dictionary’s content guidelines before writing your definition. Here’s the short version: Share definitions that other people will find meaningful and never post hate speech or people’s personal information.
Me: ait bet imma make a definition of this
Me: ait bet imma make a definition of this
by skibidigyattfanumtaxohiosigma1 January 03, 2024
A politically motivated "review" masquerading as meta-analysis in which Dr. Hillary Cass purposefully tuned their demands for good-enough evidence as so far to exclude every single study that don't fit their beliefs. In order to do that, she excluded 98% of studies that aren't high-quality (ie. those that aren't double-blinded or didn't had a control group, despite their obvious impossibility). This allowed her to pull out the conclusion that she wanted.
What's the point of low-quality studies if they are useless? If they were, they wouldn't be done anymore.
Not only that, the voice of trans people were dismissed as "biased" so that she doesn't have to comfort with uncomfortable truth.
What's the point of low-quality studies if they are useless? If they were, they wouldn't be done anymore.
Not only that, the voice of trans people were dismissed as "biased" so that she doesn't have to comfort with uncomfortable truth.
by Exdetransitioner2 April 16, 2024