by jackNjill555 January 05, 2011
by bubbah June 05, 2006
One who is incapable of winning a fruit racing match. if you are naming a person a 'krista' they generally will try to trick you into believing they have won. When defeated both in the match and the battle of wits they will end with 'for crying out loud!'.
k:"im about to win guys!"
t: "nice roll no roll."
H: "yeah, you're such a krista."
k: "are you kidding me? my lemon was CLEARLY faster than your honeydew"
T: "typical krista."
t: "nice roll no roll."
H: "yeah, you're such a krista."
k: "are you kidding me? my lemon was CLEARLY faster than your honeydew"
T: "typical krista."
by sci_on February 02, 2010
rad man: I read this quote the other day about counter-existence hauntologies and the cybergenitic narrative rhetorics of identity politics. It's a groundbreaking study of meta-physical communication modalities and uber-phantasy.
psycho guy: Man I bet it's 'krista'. What was the quote?
rad man: "When considering the ontological abyss of deontological ethics and engendered neutralities of post-a theoretical paradigms (existential angst). One must ask themselves about the dilemma of form. This atypical rubric of intransigence, converts the binary opposition of the category into that of the imperative. Once established as this, we see the post-oedipal subjectivity emerging from the cultural imaginary and into the creation of an identity. This self-reflexive process re-invents, reductively, the marginalised a historical anachronism to a more present relation to tacit space. A singular instance reinforces a retrograde shift between the object and the ideological movement between self and other. Traversing the systemised nexus of the id’s encounter with the ego and through the complex process of cathexis a re-inscription occurs within the discursively constituted social identification of the ‘I’, thus creating the concept of self. This self fractures and escapes the confines of linguistic definition. So when we examine the text, the rhetorical composition is the clearest indication of this post-oedipal subjectivities emergence. An alienated anachronism wrested from time and place, this entity exists in and for itself, radical alterity of epistemological modernity. The post-modern equivalent of Descartes’ cogito (albeit liberated from the positioning of the self and other binary oppositions proposed in classical thought). This shift brings about the reformation of pre-modern thought and a genealogical revolution in our understandings of selfhood. We now see a positioning of the subject inside and outside, alongside and beside dominant structures of post-colonial, new historical and contemporary debates. These contemporary discussions are the vanguard of post-structuralist, post-existential ennui. The conflation of objective reality with experiential ontology brings about the neo-phantasies constructivism. So you see this evolution of thought, biologically determined in the psychological imaginary moves us toward a transcendentalist relation to the epistemic and a post-phenomenological understanding of subjectivity"
psycho guy: Man that was TOTALLY 'krista'!
psycho guy: Man I bet it's 'krista'. What was the quote?
rad man: "When considering the ontological abyss of deontological ethics and engendered neutralities of post-a theoretical paradigms (existential angst). One must ask themselves about the dilemma of form. This atypical rubric of intransigence, converts the binary opposition of the category into that of the imperative. Once established as this, we see the post-oedipal subjectivity emerging from the cultural imaginary and into the creation of an identity. This self-reflexive process re-invents, reductively, the marginalised a historical anachronism to a more present relation to tacit space. A singular instance reinforces a retrograde shift between the object and the ideological movement between self and other. Traversing the systemised nexus of the id’s encounter with the ego and through the complex process of cathexis a re-inscription occurs within the discursively constituted social identification of the ‘I’, thus creating the concept of self. This self fractures and escapes the confines of linguistic definition. So when we examine the text, the rhetorical composition is the clearest indication of this post-oedipal subjectivities emergence. An alienated anachronism wrested from time and place, this entity exists in and for itself, radical alterity of epistemological modernity. The post-modern equivalent of Descartes’ cogito (albeit liberated from the positioning of the self and other binary oppositions proposed in classical thought). This shift brings about the reformation of pre-modern thought and a genealogical revolution in our understandings of selfhood. We now see a positioning of the subject inside and outside, alongside and beside dominant structures of post-colonial, new historical and contemporary debates. These contemporary discussions are the vanguard of post-structuralist, post-existential ennui. The conflation of objective reality with experiential ontology brings about the neo-phantasies constructivism. So you see this evolution of thought, biologically determined in the psychological imaginary moves us toward a transcendentalist relation to the epistemic and a post-phenomenological understanding of subjectivity"
psycho guy: Man that was TOTALLY 'krista'!
by oh really? April 26, 2008
most kristas are beautiful and kind and funny and they will always be there for you, sometimes they might stab you in the back but they will always care about you
krista is so funny!
by heyhi12233 September 27, 2018
Krista is definitely one of a kind. Truthfully, she is full of layers. Beautiful, intelligent, absolutely hysterical, and one very underrated & overlooked quality about her is that she's quite the wordsmith. She's direct, but respectful. She's strong-willed, but a total softy. She's confident, yet modest. She does this thing where she talks a lot and thinks that others think she's overdoing it, so she apologizes for the ramble. Krista makes jokes and before the other person can respond, she says "just kidding" because she has such a big heart that she doesn't want to risk offending anyone for even a moment, and it's one of her many redeeming qualities. She's that book in the bookstore that catches your eye so you pick it up and immediately you want to read it because you think it's going to be good, but what you didn't realize until you get a few chapters in, is that there is so much more to it than most realize, it's so much deeper & meaningful than anything you've ever come across, it's so much better than you originally imagined, and you can't even fathom of ever putting it down, and any other book you read feels like a waste of time because deep down, you know that nothing could ever top it. And instantly, it becomes your favorite. I will marry her.
Trust me, she's pretty frickin' great!
Trust me, she's pretty frickin' great!
by Run_CMC June 12, 2020
She is the most beautiful woman in the world! One look at her and you instantly fall in love! Her beauty is match by her amazing personality! She's kind, caring, sweet, hilarious, and has an amazing ability to deal with bull shit and give you some right back! She's fearless, but tender! She's always the life of the party and is always a blast to be with! Even tho she says she has her faults, she is perfect! I'm madly in love with this woman! There is no one I'd rather be with! Every second away from her is like I'm missing a piece of my heart! She is my everything! If you saw her, you might just see what I see! I love you so much!
Krista is amazing!
by Spicy 1989 May 16, 2014