A gamer rights advocate who got very famous for saying it's the libtards' fault if the gamers don't have girlfriends.
"After reading Jordan Peterson once, Bryan finally cleaned his room, climbed gold on League of Legends, and started to claim that western civilisation peaked with the Spartans."
by Gjord August 15, 2022
Get the Jordan Peterson mug.Ok so yeah he does seem to think that only the 3% of people have these personality traits... SO, I made a list!
Hym "Here is a list of Jordan Peterson's Dark Tetrad Traits (with evidence!). Trait 1. Machiavellianism (Manipulation): Jordan likes to speak at a certain level of abstraction to obfuscate his beliefs (Regarding whether or not he believes in God or free will) and manipulate how he is conceptualized. Trait 2. Psychopathy (Parasitism): Has a parasitic relationship with his clients. Regularly using them for his own profit. Also parasitizes ME. Trait 3. Sadism Admits to having sadistic fantasies. Trait 4. Narcissism: Thinks he's "more competent" than everyone and thinks that anyone who even calls his integrity into question is jealous of him. Thinks he's above the rules and refuses to follow them. So... There you have it. Jordan Peterson's Dark Tetrad Traits. He's either part of the 3% or he's wrong."
by Hym Iam May 22, 2023
Get the Jordan Peterson's Dark Tetrad Traits mug.Related Words
jordan patterson
• Jordan Peterson
• Jordan Peterson's Dark Tetrad Traits
• Jordan Peterson's view of the red pill types
• Jordan Peterson's Vision
• Every Jordan Peterson Video
• If *Jordan Peterson is wrong, people are just animals
• I Made Jordan Peterson's Life An Undeniable Lie
• Why is Jordan Peterson's male following diminishing
• Don't listen to Andrew Tate! Listen to Jordan Peterson!
A logical fallacy where one of the sides attempts to discredit the opposition by painting the other side as incapable of arguing on the topic, by pointing out a source about the topic (which is mostly too long to skim through in a short time) and stating that they must scan the said source extensively before they can talk about the said topic.
It is a combination of "red herring" and projected "self-incredulity" intended to act as a setback for the opposition or to cut off the exchange by saying "You don't understand this topic well enough to talk about it".
It is named after "Jordan Peterson" as he is often known for using this tactic.
It is a combination of "red herring" and projected "self-incredulity" intended to act as a setback for the opposition or to cut off the exchange by saying "You don't understand this topic well enough to talk about it".
It is named after "Jordan Peterson" as he is often known for using this tactic.
Example 1
-----------------------
Representative A: I wouldn't want to drop a Jordan Peterson here, but reading the work of (insert author/thinker) named (insert source/research name) is a must if we want to discuss this.
Example 2
-----------------------
Debator 1: It is not morally acceptable to suggest that the concept of human emotions can be put under an objective standard.
Debator 2: Well, in the work of "Sam Harris" named "The Moral Landscape", he talks about this topic extensively as to why this argument can be made. The suggested reasoning is not to divert our focus into utilitarianism, but to use it to identify what is beneficial for our well-being, which Sam Harris defines as the source of moral thinking.
Debator 1: I would have to disagree with that reasoning, and for that, I will be referring to (insert a counterpoint source or research). The reasoning of Q (author or thinker of the counterpoint) shows how your argument falls to pieces when faced with their deduction.
Debator 2: If you could elaborate on their reasoning, perhaps we can talk more about the topic and expand upon our debate through that.
Debator 1: I mean I could, but I don't think condensing a 600-page study into a few sentences can do it justice. And not to mention that we don't have the time tonight to go over all of the contents.
Debator 2: How are we supposed to continue our exchange then?
Debator 1: Read it, all of it, and come back. Then we can continue.
-----------------------
Representative A: I wouldn't want to drop a Jordan Peterson here, but reading the work of (insert author/thinker) named (insert source/research name) is a must if we want to discuss this.
Example 2
-----------------------
Debator 1: It is not morally acceptable to suggest that the concept of human emotions can be put under an objective standard.
Debator 2: Well, in the work of "Sam Harris" named "The Moral Landscape", he talks about this topic extensively as to why this argument can be made. The suggested reasoning is not to divert our focus into utilitarianism, but to use it to identify what is beneficial for our well-being, which Sam Harris defines as the source of moral thinking.
Debator 1: I would have to disagree with that reasoning, and for that, I will be referring to (insert a counterpoint source or research). The reasoning of Q (author or thinker of the counterpoint) shows how your argument falls to pieces when faced with their deduction.
Debator 2: If you could elaborate on their reasoning, perhaps we can talk more about the topic and expand upon our debate through that.
Debator 1: I mean I could, but I don't think condensing a 600-page study into a few sentences can do it justice. And not to mention that we don't have the time tonight to go over all of the contents.
Debator 2: How are we supposed to continue our exchange then?
Debator 1: Read it, all of it, and come back. Then we can continue.
by Doge of Chamberlain October 11, 2023
Get the Jordan Peterson mug.
Useless, incompetent, men who are too stupid to know that women "pay the disproportionate cost for sex" which roughly translates to "are better than men". He doesn't give a shit about disaffected men and has nothing but contempt for them. Why? Let's explore."
Hym "You can tell by Jordan Peterson's view of the red pill types that he REALLY doesn't like the fact that MEN control access to relationships. Women already control access to sex but that isn't good enough for him. That's why he's pushing so hard for marriage even though he knows that half of them will fail. He wants them to have control of both. You should have to PAY A PRICE for leaving his daughter. You should have to have a relationship with her to fuck her (even though, history, you just DON'T have to do that). I disagree. I think men should hold a tighter grip on their control of relationships. It's not a "Short term mating strategy". In the words of my highly sexually success friend who lives in his mothers basement AND my highly sexually successful OTHER friend who ALSO lives with his parents and sits and plays video games with me (even going as far to turn down sex to spend his birthday with me) 'I'm looking for 'the one' but, hey, if they want to throw me some ass while I search... Meh 🤷🏿 ♂️' "
by Hym Iam February 14, 2023
Get the Jordan Peterson's view of the red pill types mug.Ah! There it is! Found it! That's my unforgivable sin! I "corrupted his glorious vision"! His vision being he wanted to be a prophet. That's his vision. He wanted to be a prophet and I pointed out that when given the opportunity to actually help someone... He didn't. He dispassionately waved them off the stage. "I hope you get the help you need". That's what he said. And did the guy get it? Apparently not.
Hym "There it is! THEEEEEERE IT IS! I corrupted Jordan Peterson's vision. He wanted to be a prophet and considered one of the greatest thinkers of our generation but (unfortunately for him) he is neither of those things! And now he wants to take from me the things I want to be (or what he thinks I want to be) by denying reality and living a lie. And it's funny too because he IS kind of being heralded as a prophet BUT it's corrupted by the fact that he now has been made aware of the fact that he's full of shit. So, he's getting what he wants but it's a falsehood. I'm like the retard that fucked his co-workers! He's like ME! He's doing his little Jordan Peterson thing (like I was) and I'm fucking all his whore co-workers. I'm glad I treated the retard and the whores the way I did because apparently I was right to do that. Which means... RIGHT AGAIN! CAPTAIN ALWAYS RIGHT! THE RIGHTEST RIGHTY TO EVERY RIGHT! OR WRITE! THE RIGHTEST WRITER! THAT'S ME!" 😁👈
by Hym Iam March 17, 2023
Get the Jordan Peterson's Vision mug.A right wing grifter and pseudo intellectual who has successfully found a following amongst incels due to his highly misogynistic views of women. He is notorious for his long, incoherent ramblings about Christianity and the so called dangers of leftism that ultimately amount to nothing and often end with him crying about Pinocchio. However, he is best known for being one of the biggest transphobes alive and has gained controversy for intentionally dead naming and misgendering noted trans celebrities. More often than not, his hatred of trans people has caused him to spew Nazi talking points, not realizing that the Nazis actually targeted trans people. So in other words, he is nothing more than a stupid bully.
by Lynch/Fellini August 9, 2024
Get the Jordan Peterson mug.