Counter-Objector

Someone who objects to a Situation or Ideal while applying Logic, Facts, and Evidence to back up their Objections
The "Counter" part usually comes in when the person the Objector is arguing with is usually someone who Objects the same thing, but for a different reason... Usually lacking in reason entirely and just objecting because it's "cool to be different"

Joe is a Counter-Objector because he agrees with Frank that this Political Situation is bad. However, Joe disagrees with Frank on WHY it is bad.

by ThatOneCorrector November 7, 2018

conscientious objector

An asexual person, of any gender.

Doctor: Are you sexually active?
Patient: No, I’m not.
Doctor: Strike of bad luck; or are you one of those ‘conscientious objectors?’

by anonymous September 15, 2020

Laterally Objective Liberalism

The study of proving Elicia wrong in a dramatic way

Hey, did you see how silly Elicia looked when Thatcher said Laterally Objective Liberalism

Yeah, but he proved her wrong

by The_Word_Scaper May 19, 2021

subjectively objective

When you pose a statement as an opinion, but you know it's absolutely a fact

Subject 1: We've been going to Five Guys all month, let's do Wendy's for once.
Subject 2: We can't, because Five Guys is the only correct option, but that's just my subjectively objective opinion.

by AerialSong May 23, 2022

Maglione objective

A statement made using the word “objective” while simultaneously being completely subjective and inaccurate. Most cases include alarmingly cold takes, and shockingly one sided bias with no factual grounds to make the claim.

Objectively speaking, the 9th round is the best round to take a QB” Tyler stated with blind confidence

“Oh no you claimed to be objective, yet you used Maglione objective instead. Not only are you wrong, you’re stuck trying to sell how good Jared Goff is all year because no one wants to trade for that dogshit player”

by Tyler Maglione August 18, 2022

Evidence Objectivity Bias

A variation of objectivity bias where something only counts as evidence if the person making the judgment says it's evidence. "That's not evidence because I say so." The bias replaces objective standards of evidence with personal fiat, making the individual the sole arbiter of what counts as proof. Evidence Objectivity Bias is what allows conspiracy theorists to dismiss mountains of data while accepting a single tweet as proof. It's what allows bad-faith arguers to demand evidence, then reject it, then demand different evidence, then reject that—because the real standard is not evidence but agreement. If you agree with me, your evidence counts; if you don't, it doesn't. The bias is the "because I said so" of epistemology, the final refuge of those who have no arguments left.

Example: "She provided study after study showing vaccine safety. He dismissed each one with Evidence Objectivity Bias: 'That's not real evidence.' When she asked what would count, he said 'I'll know it when I see it.' He never saw it. The bias had made him the sole judge of what counts as proof—and his judgment was that nothing that disagreed with him could ever count. Evidence wasn't the issue; control was."

by Dumu The Void February 20, 2026

Logical Objectivity Bias

A variation of objectivity bias where something only counts as logical if the person making the judgment says it's logical. "That's not logical because I say so." The bias replaces logical standards with personal authority, making the individual the arbiter of reason itself. Logical Objectivity Bias is what allows people to reject valid arguments as "illogical" while accepting obvious fallacies from their own side. It's what makes debate impossible because the standards shift constantly—what's logical is whatever supports my position; what's illogical is whatever challenges it. The bias is the ultimate expression of epistemic narcissism: not just believing you're right, but believing you're the definition of rightness.

Example: "He presented a perfectly valid syllogism. She responded with Logical Objectivity Bias: 'That's not logical.' No explanation, no reasoning—just declaration. When he asked what made it illogical, she said 'It just is.' The bias had made her the sole judge of logic, and her judgment was that anything she disagreed with was automatically unreasonable. Reason wasn't the issue; authority was."

by Dumu The Void February 20, 2026