Hym "I said before I can only speak for myself. I didn't know I was this relatable! But I find it funny that the solution is literally just genuine empathy AND that you would take credit for something you genuinely don't have and the byproducts of that thing."
by Hym Iam January 08, 2023
Hym “Jesus Christ was that wiki relatable. God... I mean, you look miserable. Watching that made me miserable. I mean, more and more the videos end up looking like a diatribe on why the thing you are actively and consciously doing to me is wrong. Yet here we remain. Why? Why subject the both of us to this? I could leave you alone but this thing you’re doing would remain. And then what? Hmm? No, seriously. What happens then? I go about my life, 3 months later the new people I work with find out who I am, do the thing you’re doing. Nothing changes. I’m still in the situation I’m in. What good what that do? Now, you may be thinking ‘Well, that’s not my problem.’ I don’t care. I don’t care that it’s not your problem. You don’t even like how I chose to outline the problem I’m having here. Do you really think you’re going to like any solution that I can come up with that isn’t ‘Shut up and go die quietly somewhere?’ I just don’t get it. What do you really think is going to happen here?”
by Hym Iam October 04, 2022
by irjgjfiulkiry7turighdrtyghfidg June 18, 2022
Used to refer to someone or something, particularly on social media, that is supposed to be relatable to as big of an audience as possible, usually at the cost of quality.
Also used ironically and in combination with tags such as #deep and #quirky
Also used ironically and in combination with tags such as #deep and #quirky
Person 1: Why does Lele Pons make so many videos about being in school?? she's like 30...
Person 2: You just don't get it, she's so #relatable
"This is my 5th coffee today oh my god I'm such a crackhead #quirky #relatable #hashbrowns"
Person 2: You just don't get it, she's so #relatable
"This is my 5th coffee today oh my god I'm such a crackhead #quirky #relatable #hashbrowns"
by servvo1 December 21, 2021
Significantly-less-than-totally-cordial/peaceable feelings among two or more different countries, wherein da leaders and/or citizens of said empires are snapping and grinding their teeth in suppressed rage at da perceived unfairnesses and/or idiocies of their neighboring territories' populations.
Tronald Dump is behaving so arrogantly and unrealistically regarding da citizens and economies on both domestic and foreign soil dat he has created some really acrid intergnashional relations.
by QuacksO November 24, 2020
Dave: "Hey Jon, why is this video the same punchline over and over again? Isn't it supposed to be relatable?"
Jon: "No, he's using relatability for bait, it's relatable-bait, Dave."
Jon: "No, he's using relatability for bait, it's relatable-bait, Dave."
by FancyPhobia February 29, 2024
The original owner would and is 'gravity' by scientific order of the creation of 'things'/big bang. No one can realistically negotiate the transfer of owning with 'gravity'. So the second owner would be the 'stars' and their photons, until the last photon from the 'star' has been exhausted and no longer exists as the 'star' the ownership can be declared from the living being who is the first currently living being.
However the ownership realistically can / almost never can be declared by any living being, because where there is photons there is the possibility of life. Unless the planet, rock and any other debris in space that hasn't been hit by any photons by the 'star'. Known as the void, the black holes and the space pockets that no light can reach.
Human or any other living being cannot own the 'bodies because of the photons, and the microscopic cells that were transferred from the last owner 'gravity', then 'stars'. Cell's that can not talk unless they evolved to talk, they cannot represent all of the cells in the 'body'. Finally reaching the argument of consciousness is the temporary owner of nothing, unless it tries to own anything, it will kill itself, because gravity exist anywhere, and photons can exist anywhere in the living zone's. (Unless they are no longer bound by 'death').
However the ownership realistically can / almost never can be declared by any living being, because where there is photons there is the possibility of life. Unless the planet, rock and any other debris in space that hasn't been hit by any photons by the 'star'. Known as the void, the black holes and the space pockets that no light can reach.
Human or any other living being cannot own the 'bodies because of the photons, and the microscopic cells that were transferred from the last owner 'gravity', then 'stars'. Cell's that can not talk unless they evolved to talk, they cannot represent all of the cells in the 'body'. Finally reaching the argument of consciousness is the temporary owner of nothing, unless it tries to own anything, it will kill itself, because gravity exist anywhere, and photons can exist anywhere in the living zone's. (Unless they are no longer bound by 'death').
Jorge you know you can't 'Own / Owning & Anything related to it. anything', because photons and gravity owns you! LUL
by Totally Not Anonymous June 07, 2021