Factual Objectivity Bias

The belief that if you simply state enough discrete, verifiable facts, you have delivered objective truth—as if facts interpret themselves. The Factual Objectivist floods conversations with data points, assuming that the sheer weight of correct information will inevitably lead everyone to the same conclusion. They miss that facts are always selected, framed, and connected by someone with a perspective. Two people can agree on every fact and still disagree violently about what those facts mean. But the Factual Objectivist treats meaning as something that automatically falls out of facts, like water from a cloud.

"I've given you seventeen statistics about crime rates, so my point is proven," she said, unaware that her selection of statistics and her interpretation of their significance were doing all the work. Factual Objectivity Bias: drowning in data while starving for wisdom.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 22, 2026

Ignorance Objectivity Bias

The belief that not knowing much about a topic actually makes you more objective—that knowledge itself is a form of corruption. The Ignorance Objectivist thinks that experts are biased by their expertise, that learning creates distortion, and that the fresh, untrained eye sees things more clearly. This is the bias of people who pride themselves on "just asking questions" without doing any of the reading required to understand the answers. It's ignorance reframed as a virtue, naivete as methodology.

"I haven't read any of those studies, so I can look at this with fresh eyes, unbiased by all that research," said the man whose "fresh eyes" were about to reinvent a wheel that's been round for decades. Ignorance Objectivity Bias: when not knowing becomes a flex.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 22, 2026

Neutral Objectivity Bias

The belief that the most objective position is always the one that takes no side—that neutrality itself is a form of truth. The Neutral Objectivist treats every conflict as something to be split down the middle, every argument as something to be mediated, every injustice as something with "two valid perspectives." They mistake the performance of non-alignment for the achievement of clarity. This bias is most common among people whose privilege allows them the luxury of never needing to take a side, because no side is actively harming them.

"I'm just neutral on this human rights issue—I want to hear both sides objectively," she said, as if the people being harmed were just one perspective among many. Neutral Objectivity Bias: when comfort with the status quo dresses up as wisdom.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 22, 2026

Authority Objectivity Bias

The assumption that statements from recognized authorities—institutions, experts, official sources—are inherently more objective than claims from marginalized or unofficial sources. It's not always wrong to trust expertise, but the bias lies in treating institutional authority as a guarantee of objectivity rather than one signal among many. The Authority Objectivist forgets that institutions have their own biases, their own histories of exclusion, their own incentives to protect themselves. They trust the peer-reviewed paper without asking who wasn't allowed into the conversation that produced it.

"The university study says this, so it's objective," he said, unaware of the funding sources, the demographic homogeneity of the researchers, and the centuries of institutional bias that shaped what counted as a "study" in the first place. Authority Objectivity Bias: mistaking prestige for purity.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 22, 2026

Scale of EGE Objectivity

A scaled designed to objectively view every game ever. Every game played has a chance to do, to some degree of success or failure, anything that a video game can. The scale is designed to encompass everything a video game is capable of offering its player or players. Higher scores mean the game offered more. Lower meaning they offered less. You can choose two games for comparison at your leisure. EX: Castlevania: Symphony of the Night 9.067/10

I am ranking this game using the Scale of EGE Objectivity.

by LuciP April 21, 2018

Hard Problem of Objectivity

The myth of the view from nowhere. True objectivity would require a disembodied, ahistorical, bias-free perspective completely outside the system being observed. This is impossible for humans. Every observation is made by a situated observer with a body, a language, a culture, and a set of prior beliefs. The hard problem is that while we can approach objectivity through methods (blinding, controls, peer review), we can never fully attain it. The ideal of pure objectivity may be a necessary regulative ideal for science and ethics, but it is also a philosophical phantom.

Example: A journalist aims to report "objectively" on a political protest. But their choice of which quotes to feature, which images to show, and even the word "protest" (vs. "riot" or "demonstration") reflects a subjective framework. The hard problem: Striving for objectivity is crucial, but claiming to have achieved it is often a power move—a way of dismissing other perspectives as "subjective" or "biased." True objectivity might be the process of continually acknowledging and correcting for subjectivity, not its elimination. Hard Problem of Objectivity.

by Enkigal January 24, 2026

Fallacy of Arbitrary Objectivity

The logical error of claiming that your perspective is objective while everyone else's is biased, without providing any justification for why your viewpoint deserves the "objective" label. This fallacy is the bedrock of punditry, editorial writing, and conversations with your uncle at Thanksgiving. The person committing it positions themselves as a neutral observer floating above the fray, while everyone else is mired in ideology, emotion, or self-interest. The reality, of course, is that they're just as biased as everyone else—they've just declared their bias to be the center of the universe, which is a very convenient way to never have to examine your own assumptions.

Example: "The pundit committed the fallacy of arbitrary objectivity daily, presenting his conservative opinions as 'common sense' and 'what most Americans think' while describing liberal views as 'ideological' and 'out of touch.' He genuinely believed he was objective, which was the most objective sign that he wasn't."

by Dumu The Void February 15, 2026